Case study on decarbonization strategies for LNG export terminals using heat and power from CSP/PV hybrid plants

Sabrina Hasni , Werner J. Platzer
{"title":"Case study on decarbonization strategies for LNG export terminals using heat and power from CSP/PV hybrid plants","authors":"Sabrina Hasni ,&nbsp;Werner J. Platzer","doi":"10.1016/j.seja.2023.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The race towards decarbonization is driving major oil and gas companies to explore means to use renewable heat and power for their plants as part of their commitment to reduce their carbon intensity by 80% to 100% by 2050 (Holbrook, 2023). In terms of GHG (Greenhouse Gas) emissions, natural gas is considered the cleanest fossil fuel option available, and decarbonization of new LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) projects is on the radar of many LNG projects developers. In addition, LNG cargos will have to be certified in the future by accredited authorities to meet defined GHG emission levels (Stern, 2019).</p><p>This research study investigates a new concept of providing both heat and power from a PV (Photovoltaic) and CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) hybrid plant to meet the energy demand of an LNG export terminal. Two locations have been investigated for potential future LNG projects: Karratha in Australia and Ras Laffan in Qatar. Both locations have DNI values higher than 2000 kWh/m<sup>2</sup>/year, which is the minimum level required for CSP technology (Lovegrove and Stein, 2021).</p><p>The LCCA (Levelized Cost of CO2 abatement) was used to compare the various solar configurations to select the option that will bring the greatest amount of CO2 reduction for the same investment cost (CGEP, 2020). The solar configurations technical parameters were defined based on the surface land available, natural gas feed composition and LNG plant design characteristics. The techno-economic assessment was carried-out taking into consideration the electricity price, the grid carbon intensity, and the CO2 tax in the region.</p><p>Whilst in Australia a collocated single plant is favourable in terms of land availability and DNI (Direct Normal Irradiation) level, in Qatar, heat and power production have been separated into two distinct locations. Next to the LNG plant, a CSP plant provides heat only, whereas 130 km away, the hybrid PV/CSP plant located at Qurain EL Bawl provides electric power.</p><p>The results indicate that the PV/CSP hybrid plant significantly accelerates the decarbonization of energy supply to the “All electric” LNG Plant. Depending on the solar field size, the quantity of CO<sub>2</sub> emitted between 2025 and 2050 is reduced by 78–81% for Karratha (Australia) and by 82–88% for Ras Laffan (Qatar) compared to a grid connected plant.</p><p>In addition, the economic assessment indicated that buying electricity from the grid during the period 2025–2050 would be more expensive for Australia then investing in a PV/CSP plant. In Qatar, the LCOE range of 93–110 US$/MWh is not competitive with the price of electricity in the region Qatar, mainly because of energy subsidies, however both the carbon tax and electricity price will need to be raised to the same level as in Australia to diversify and expand the power sector in the region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101174,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Advances","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667113123000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The race towards decarbonization is driving major oil and gas companies to explore means to use renewable heat and power for their plants as part of their commitment to reduce their carbon intensity by 80% to 100% by 2050 (Holbrook, 2023). In terms of GHG (Greenhouse Gas) emissions, natural gas is considered the cleanest fossil fuel option available, and decarbonization of new LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) projects is on the radar of many LNG projects developers. In addition, LNG cargos will have to be certified in the future by accredited authorities to meet defined GHG emission levels (Stern, 2019).

This research study investigates a new concept of providing both heat and power from a PV (Photovoltaic) and CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) hybrid plant to meet the energy demand of an LNG export terminal. Two locations have been investigated for potential future LNG projects: Karratha in Australia and Ras Laffan in Qatar. Both locations have DNI values higher than 2000 kWh/m2/year, which is the minimum level required for CSP technology (Lovegrove and Stein, 2021).

The LCCA (Levelized Cost of CO2 abatement) was used to compare the various solar configurations to select the option that will bring the greatest amount of CO2 reduction for the same investment cost (CGEP, 2020). The solar configurations technical parameters were defined based on the surface land available, natural gas feed composition and LNG plant design characteristics. The techno-economic assessment was carried-out taking into consideration the electricity price, the grid carbon intensity, and the CO2 tax in the region.

Whilst in Australia a collocated single plant is favourable in terms of land availability and DNI (Direct Normal Irradiation) level, in Qatar, heat and power production have been separated into two distinct locations. Next to the LNG plant, a CSP plant provides heat only, whereas 130 km away, the hybrid PV/CSP plant located at Qurain EL Bawl provides electric power.

The results indicate that the PV/CSP hybrid plant significantly accelerates the decarbonization of energy supply to the “All electric” LNG Plant. Depending on the solar field size, the quantity of CO2 emitted between 2025 and 2050 is reduced by 78–81% for Karratha (Australia) and by 82–88% for Ras Laffan (Qatar) compared to a grid connected plant.

In addition, the economic assessment indicated that buying electricity from the grid during the period 2025–2050 would be more expensive for Australia then investing in a PV/CSP plant. In Qatar, the LCOE range of 93–110 US$/MWh is not competitive with the price of electricity in the region Qatar, mainly because of energy subsidies, however both the carbon tax and electricity price will need to be raised to the same level as in Australia to diversify and expand the power sector in the region.

利用CSP/PV混合电厂的热能和电力的LNG出口终端脱碳策略的案例研究
脱碳竞赛促使主要石油和天然气公司探索为其工厂使用可再生热能和电力的方法,作为其到2050年将碳强度降低80%至100%的承诺的一部分(Holbrook,2023)。就GHG(温室气体)排放而言,天然气被认为是可用的最清洁的化石燃料选择,许多液化天然气项目开发商都在关注新液化天然气(LNG)项目的脱碳。此外,液化天然气货物未来必须经过认证机构的认证,才能达到规定的温室气体排放水平(Stern,2019)。本研究调查了一种新概念,即通过光伏和聚光太阳能混合发电厂提供热量和电力,以满足液化天然气出口码头的能源需求。已经对两个潜在的未来液化天然气项目进行了调查:澳大利亚的卡拉塔和卡塔尔的拉斯拉凡。这两个地点的DNI值都高于2000 kWh/m2/年,这是CSP技术所需的最低水平(Lovegrove和Stein,2021)。LCCA(二氧化碳减排水平化成本)用于比较各种太阳能配置,以选择在相同投资成本下能最大程度减少二氧化碳排放的选项(CGEP,2020)。太阳能配置技术参数是根据可用的地表土地、天然气原料成分和液化天然气工厂设计特点确定的。进行技术经济评估时考虑了该地区的电价、电网碳强度和二氧化碳税。在澳大利亚,就土地可用性和DNI(直接正常辐射)水平而言,一个并置的单一工厂是有利的,而在卡塔尔,热能和电力生产被分为两个不同的位置。在液化天然气工厂旁边,CSP工厂仅提供热量,而在130公里外,位于Qurain EL Bawl的混合光伏/CSP工厂提供电力。结果表明,光伏/CSP混合发电厂显著加速了“全电动”液化天然气厂的能源供应脱碳。根据太阳能场的大小,与并网发电厂相比,卡拉塔(澳大利亚)2025年至2050年间的二氧化碳排放量减少了78-81%,拉斯拉芬(卡塔尔)减少了82-88%。此外,经济评估表明,对澳大利亚来说,在2025年至2050年期间从电网购买电力的成本将高于投资光伏/聚光太阳能发电厂的成本。在卡塔尔,93–110美元/MWh的LCOE范围与卡塔尔地区的电价没有竞争力,主要是因为能源补贴,但碳税和电价都需要提高到与澳大利亚相同的水平,以实现该地区电力行业的多样化和扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信