Occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soil: Sources, fate, and remediation

Yifei Wang, Umar Munir, Qingguo Huang
{"title":"Occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soil: Sources, fate, and remediation","authors":"Yifei Wang,&nbsp;Umar Munir,&nbsp;Qingguo Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.seh.2023.100004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are being widely investigated for their distribution and remediation in the environment. It is crucial to consider the interactions of PFAS between soil and the other media in the ecosystem, including air, water, and plants, when studying their fate and transport in soil, while few studies have taken such an integrative approach. This review examined the potential input of PFAS to soil from air, water, and landfill by analyzing both the PFAS concentration in each source and the mechanisms by which a soil is impacted by PFAS from these sources. It was found that PFAS in air (on average 10<sup>1−2</sup> ​pg/m<sup>3</sup>) and landfill leachates (on average 10<sup>0-</sup><sup>2</sup> ​ng/L) are the main sources of PFAS in soil. Many factors, such as solution pH and cations, influence sorption and desorption of PFAS in the water-soil interface, but no single factor is deterministic. The migration of PFAS from soil to plant through root uptake was found in many plant species, including wheat and maize, and the effects vary with different PFAS and plant species. PFAS levels in soil were associated with land-use type. They were the highest in the primary exposure sites (10<sup>−1</sup>-10<sup>2</sup> ​ng/g), followed by secondary exposure sites (10<sup>−1</sup>-10<sup>1</sup> ​ng/g), and background sites (10<sup>−2</sup>-10<sup>1</sup> ​ng/g), with legacy PFAS- PFOA (10<sup>0-</sup><sup>1</sup> ​ng/g) and PFOS (10<sup>0-</sup><sup>2</sup> ​ng/g) as the most predominant. There are a few promising destructive technologies targeted at PFAS in soil, such as thermal treatment and ultrasound, but still need to overcome low efficiency and high cost to scale up. In the meantime, PFAS may either be immobilized in soil or be removed for ex-situ treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94356,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Environmental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949919423000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are being widely investigated for their distribution and remediation in the environment. It is crucial to consider the interactions of PFAS between soil and the other media in the ecosystem, including air, water, and plants, when studying their fate and transport in soil, while few studies have taken such an integrative approach. This review examined the potential input of PFAS to soil from air, water, and landfill by analyzing both the PFAS concentration in each source and the mechanisms by which a soil is impacted by PFAS from these sources. It was found that PFAS in air (on average 101−2 ​pg/m3) and landfill leachates (on average 100-2 ​ng/L) are the main sources of PFAS in soil. Many factors, such as solution pH and cations, influence sorption and desorption of PFAS in the water-soil interface, but no single factor is deterministic. The migration of PFAS from soil to plant through root uptake was found in many plant species, including wheat and maize, and the effects vary with different PFAS and plant species. PFAS levels in soil were associated with land-use type. They were the highest in the primary exposure sites (10−1-102 ​ng/g), followed by secondary exposure sites (10−1-101 ​ng/g), and background sites (10−2-101 ​ng/g), with legacy PFAS- PFOA (100-1 ​ng/g) and PFOS (100-2 ​ng/g) as the most predominant. There are a few promising destructive technologies targeted at PFAS in soil, such as thermal treatment and ultrasound, but still need to overcome low efficiency and high cost to scale up. In the meantime, PFAS may either be immobilized in soil or be removed for ex-situ treatment.

Abstract Image

土壤中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的发生:来源、归宿和修复
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)在环境中的分布和修复正受到广泛的研究。在研究PFAS在土壤中的命运和迁移时,考虑土壤与生态系统中其他介质(包括空气、水和植物)之间的相互作用是至关重要的,而很少有研究采取这种综合方法。本综述通过分析每个来源的PFAS浓度以及这些来源的PFAS对土壤的影响机制,研究了空气、水和垃圾填埋场中PFAS对土壤的潜在输入。结果表明,空气(平均101−2 pg/m3)和垃圾渗滤液(平均100−2 ng/L)是土壤中PFAS的主要来源。影响PFAS在水-土界面吸附和解吸的因素很多,如溶液pH和阳离子,但没有一个因素是确定的。在小麦和玉米等多种植物中均发现了PFAS通过根系吸收从土壤向植物的迁移,其作用因不同的PFAS和植物种类而异。土壤中PFAS含量与土地利用类型相关。它们在一次暴露位点(10−1 ~ 102 ng/g)中最高,其次是二次暴露位点(10−1 ~ 101 ng/g)和背景位点(10−2 ~ 101 ng/g),以遗留PFAS- PFOA (100 ~ 1 ng/g)和PFOS (100 ~ 2 ng/g)为主要。目前,针对土壤中PFAS的一些有前景的破坏技术,如热处理和超声波,但仍需克服低效率和高成本的问题才能大规模推广。同时,PFAS可以被固定在土壤中,也可以被移出土壤进行移地处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信