Wetlands ecological security assessment in lower reaches of Taoerhe river connected with Nenjiang river using modified PSR model

Yanhong Zhang , Peng Zang , Huali Guo , Guodong Yang
{"title":"Wetlands ecological security assessment in lower reaches of Taoerhe river connected with Nenjiang river using modified PSR model","authors":"Yanhong Zhang ,&nbsp;Peng Zang ,&nbsp;Huali Guo ,&nbsp;Guodong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.hydres.2022.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past two decades, with the implementation of a series of ecological restoration projects and the comprehensive improvement projects of agriculture, most of the ecological environments in Western area of Northeast region have been significantly improved. Therefore nearly all the wetlands have been significantly improved from the perspective of landscape and vegetation cover. In particular, China has just promulgated a Wetland protection law to further promote the concept of wetland protection into society. How safe the wetlands will be after the changes is a priority. The objective of this paper is to construct an improved comprehensive evaluation model to evaluate the wetland safety situation based on several types of data. In this paper, a typical wetland area situated in the Momoge National Protected Area is selected, based on pressure-state-response (PSR) model and the mathematical method of catastrophe progression theory, geographical information system (GIS) approach is involved to improve the model parameters, the ecological security situation within the study area is evaluated from 2000 to 2020. The results show: (i) the ecological security in study area varied nonlinearly, and has been turning worse from 2000 to 2009, while during 2009 to 2020 has been turning better; (ii) the ecological security levels in Momoge wetlands region were in moderate and primary warning during the past two decades, with higher value of ecological security comprehensive index in the middle region and lower value in the east and west region in the area; (iii) the area with lower value of eco-security index is corresponded with the distribution of settlements and river valleys where the the intensity of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) is much wider and deeper than the other area. From above, it is clearly that even within national protected areas, wetlands are mostly at a moderate ecological level and unevenly distributed in study area. Influenced by human factors, wetlands are at a lower security level. From that, wetlands protection only is in the initial stage, and wetlands protection and restoration still has a long way to go.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100615,"journal":{"name":"HydroResearch","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 156-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HydroResearch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589757822000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the past two decades, with the implementation of a series of ecological restoration projects and the comprehensive improvement projects of agriculture, most of the ecological environments in Western area of Northeast region have been significantly improved. Therefore nearly all the wetlands have been significantly improved from the perspective of landscape and vegetation cover. In particular, China has just promulgated a Wetland protection law to further promote the concept of wetland protection into society. How safe the wetlands will be after the changes is a priority. The objective of this paper is to construct an improved comprehensive evaluation model to evaluate the wetland safety situation based on several types of data. In this paper, a typical wetland area situated in the Momoge National Protected Area is selected, based on pressure-state-response (PSR) model and the mathematical method of catastrophe progression theory, geographical information system (GIS) approach is involved to improve the model parameters, the ecological security situation within the study area is evaluated from 2000 to 2020. The results show: (i) the ecological security in study area varied nonlinearly, and has been turning worse from 2000 to 2009, while during 2009 to 2020 has been turning better; (ii) the ecological security levels in Momoge wetlands region were in moderate and primary warning during the past two decades, with higher value of ecological security comprehensive index in the middle region and lower value in the east and west region in the area; (iii) the area with lower value of eco-security index is corresponded with the distribution of settlements and river valleys where the the intensity of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) is much wider and deeper than the other area. From above, it is clearly that even within national protected areas, wetlands are mostly at a moderate ecological level and unevenly distributed in study area. Influenced by human factors, wetlands are at a lower security level. From that, wetlands protection only is in the initial stage, and wetlands protection and restoration still has a long way to go.

基于改进PSR模型的桃尔河下游与嫩江相连湿地生态安全评价
近二十年来,随着一系列生态修复工程和农业综合整治工程的实施,东北地区西部大部分地区的生态环境得到了明显改善。因此,从景观和植被覆盖的角度来看,几乎所有湿地都有了明显的改善。特别是中国刚刚颁布了《湿地保护法》,进一步将湿地保护理念推向社会。改变后湿地的安全程度是当务之急。本文的目的是基于多种类型的数据,构建一个改进的湿地安全状况综合评价模型。本文以莫莫格国家级自然保护区为研究对象,基于压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型和突变级数理论的数学方法,利用地理信息系统(GIS)方法对模型参数进行改进,对2000 - 2020年研究区生态安全状况进行了评价。结果表明:(1)研究区生态安全呈非线性变化趋势,2000 - 2009年呈恶化趋势,2009 - 2020年呈好转趋势;(ii)近20 a来,莫莫格湿地区生态安全水平处于中度和初级预警状态,生态安全综合指数在中部较高,东部和西部较低;(3)生态安全指数值较低的区域与聚落和河谷分布相对应,这些区域的土地利用和土地覆盖变化强度比其他区域大得多、深得多。由此可见,即使在国家级保护区内,湿地也大多处于中等生态水平,分布不均匀。受人为因素的影响,湿地处于较低的安全水平。由此可见,湿地保护仅处于初级阶段,湿地保护与恢复任重道远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信