Therapeutic innovation and digital therapies in the world: Comparison between the American and European regulatory framework, with focus on Italy

Q3 Social Sciences
Alessia Romagnoli , Andrea Zovi , Michela Sabbatucci , Francesco Ferrara , Antonio Vitiello
{"title":"Therapeutic innovation and digital therapies in the world: Comparison between the American and European regulatory framework, with focus on Italy","authors":"Alessia Romagnoli ,&nbsp;Andrea Zovi ,&nbsp;Michela Sabbatucci ,&nbsp;Francesco Ferrara ,&nbsp;Antonio Vitiello","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Digital therapies (DTx) are software-generated therapeutic interventions directly to patients developed to prevent, manage or treat a disease. They figure as an emerging phenomenon within the scientific landscape which is attracting considerable international interest. In the absence of any in-depth study in the current international scientific literature, this review aimed to provide an overview of the definition and classification of DTx and the main issues relating to clinical studies, ethical implications and gray areas in the international regulatory processes, eventually providing an in-depth look focused on the American and European regulatory landscape. It emerged that DTx are not contemplated in a homogeneous way by the European legislation currently in force. This lack would risk incorrectly classifying real therapies, subjected to </span>clinical trials<span>, often very different from each other and with a real impact on patients’ health, causing several critical issues both of safety and guarantee of access to treatment. Since the great potential of DTx will be only exploited when there is an appropriate regulatory framework which frame and define the field, the implementation of a stable regulatory system complementing conventional drug prescriptions is needed as soon as possible. Besides, TDx-specific research ethics, patient-centered care, as well as training and education of health professionals need strengthened and consolidated interprofessional cooperation in order to address the new skills, competences and challenges posed by DTx-related practices.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital therapies (DTx) are software-generated therapeutic interventions directly to patients developed to prevent, manage or treat a disease. They figure as an emerging phenomenon within the scientific landscape which is attracting considerable international interest. In the absence of any in-depth study in the current international scientific literature, this review aimed to provide an overview of the definition and classification of DTx and the main issues relating to clinical studies, ethical implications and gray areas in the international regulatory processes, eventually providing an in-depth look focused on the American and European regulatory landscape. It emerged that DTx are not contemplated in a homogeneous way by the European legislation currently in force. This lack would risk incorrectly classifying real therapies, subjected to clinical trials, often very different from each other and with a real impact on patients’ health, causing several critical issues both of safety and guarantee of access to treatment. Since the great potential of DTx will be only exploited when there is an appropriate regulatory framework which frame and define the field, the implementation of a stable regulatory system complementing conventional drug prescriptions is needed as soon as possible. Besides, TDx-specific research ethics, patient-centered care, as well as training and education of health professionals need strengthened and consolidated interprofessional cooperation in order to address the new skills, competences and challenges posed by DTx-related practices.

世界上的治疗创新和数字疗法:美国和欧洲监管框架的比较,重点是意大利
数字疗法(DTx)是直接针对患者开发的软件生成的治疗干预措施,用于预防、管理或治疗疾病。它们是科学界的一种新兴现象,正引起国际社会的极大兴趣。在目前国际科学文献中缺乏任何深入研究的情况下,本综述旨在概述DTx的定义和分类,以及与临床研究、伦理影响和国际监管过程中的灰色地带有关的主要问题,最终提供一个深入关注美国和欧洲监管格局的研究。目前生效的欧洲立法并未以相同的方式考虑DTx。这种缺乏可能会使经过临床试验的真正疗法被错误地分类,这些疗法往往彼此差别很大,对患者的健康产生实际影响,造成安全和保证获得治疗的几个关键问题。由于DTx的巨大潜力只有在有一个适当的监管框架来界定和界定该领域的情况下才能得到开发,因此需要尽快实施一个稳定的监管系统,以补充传统药物处方。此外,tdx特有的研究伦理、以患者为中心的护理以及卫生专业人员的培训和教育需要加强和巩固专业间合作,以应对与tdx相关的实践所带来的新技能、能力和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信