Working together for patient health: Assessing interprofessional competencies among healthcare professionals in Lebanon

Q3 Social Sciences
Iqbal Fahs , Marwan Akel , Chadia Haddad , Hala Sacre , Aline Hajj , Rony M. Zeenny , Katia Iskandar , Pascale Salameh
{"title":"Working together for patient health: Assessing interprofessional competencies among healthcare professionals in Lebanon","authors":"Iqbal Fahs ,&nbsp;Marwan Akel ,&nbsp;Chadia Haddad ,&nbsp;Hala Sacre ,&nbsp;Aline Hajj ,&nbsp;Rony M. Zeenny ,&nbsp;Katia Iskandar ,&nbsp;Pascale Salameh","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is the gold standard for safe, high-quality, and accessible patient-centered care. This study aims to assess IPC core competencies among Lebanese healthcare providers from different professions and explore the influence of several factors, including leadership, work ethics, and specialty, on healthcare IPC in Lebanon.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional online survey enrolled 245 healthcare workers in Lebanon between July and December 2021. The Interprofessional Education<span> Collaborative (IPEC) Competency Self-Assessment Tool Version 3 was used to assess IPC. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to compare the total competency scale and subscales between the leadership group, work ethic, specialty, and education level, taking into account potential confounding variables, namely, age and gender.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean competency total scale was 4.22 ± 0.68. The bivariate analysis<span> showed a significantly higher mean competency among participants who have a full-time job, higher administrative leadership (4.30 vs. 3.08, p = 0.001), interpersonal leadership (4.29 vs. 2.94, p = 0.006), conceptual leadership (4.28 vs. 3.15, p = 0.010) and higher work ethics (4.51 vs. 4.12, p &lt; 0.001). Older age (r = 0.15, p = 0.017) was also significantly associated with higher competency. The multivariate analysis showed that having only high work ethics, as compared to low, remains significantly associated with higher total interprofessional competency, including the Interaction and Interprofessional Values subscales. No differences in IPEC scales between pharmacists and other healthcare providers were noted.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The IPEC total competency score was higher among full-time healthcare providers and those who scored higher on leadership skills and work ethics. The study outcome shows the importance of education in interprofessional practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is the gold standard for safe, high-quality, and accessible patient-centered care. This study aims to assess IPC core competencies among Lebanese healthcare providers from different professions and explore the influence of several factors, including leadership, work ethics, and specialty, on healthcare IPC in Lebanon.

Methods

This cross-sectional online survey enrolled 245 healthcare workers in Lebanon between July and December 2021. The Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Competency Self-Assessment Tool Version 3 was used to assess IPC. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to compare the total competency scale and subscales between the leadership group, work ethic, specialty, and education level, taking into account potential confounding variables, namely, age and gender.

Results

The mean competency total scale was 4.22 ± 0.68. The bivariate analysis showed a significantly higher mean competency among participants who have a full-time job, higher administrative leadership (4.30 vs. 3.08, p = 0.001), interpersonal leadership (4.29 vs. 2.94, p = 0.006), conceptual leadership (4.28 vs. 3.15, p = 0.010) and higher work ethics (4.51 vs. 4.12, p < 0.001). Older age (r = 0.15, p = 0.017) was also significantly associated with higher competency. The multivariate analysis showed that having only high work ethics, as compared to low, remains significantly associated with higher total interprofessional competency, including the Interaction and Interprofessional Values subscales. No differences in IPEC scales between pharmacists and other healthcare providers were noted.

Conclusion

The IPEC total competency score was higher among full-time healthcare providers and those who scored higher on leadership skills and work ethics. The study outcome shows the importance of education in interprofessional practice.

为病人健康共同努力:评估黎巴嫩保健专业人员的跨专业能力
专业间合作(IPC)是安全、高质量和可及的以患者为中心的护理的黄金标准。本研究旨在评估来自不同职业的黎巴嫩医疗保健提供者的IPC核心能力,并探讨领导力、职业道德和专业等几个因素对黎巴嫩医疗保健IPC的影响。方法该横断面在线调查于2021年7月至12月在黎巴嫩招募了245名卫生保健工作者。本研究采用跨专业教育合作(IPEC)能力自评工具第3版来评估IPC。考虑到潜在的混杂变量,即年龄和性别,对领导群体、职业道德、专业和教育水平之间的总胜任力量表和子量表进行了双变量和多变量分析。结果胜任力总量表平均为4.22±0.68。双变量分析显示,拥有全职工作、行政领导能力较强(4.30 vs. 3.08, p = 0.001)、人际领导能力较强(4.29 vs. 2.94, p = 0.006)、概念领导能力较强(4.28 vs. 3.15, p = 0.010)和职业道德较强(4.51 vs. 4.12, p <0.001)。年龄越大,胜任能力越高(r = 0.15, p = 0.017)。多变量分析显示,与低职业道德相比,高职业道德与更高的整体跨专业能力(包括相互作用和跨专业价值观子量表)仍然显著相关。药剂师和其他医疗保健提供者之间的IPEC量表没有差异。结论全职医护人员的IPEC总胜任力得分较高,领导技能和职业道德得分较高。研究结果显示了教育在跨专业实践中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信