Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians in Lebanon

Q3 Social Sciences
Maha A. Habre , Mary Dolansky , Marilyn Lotas , Souha Allam , Joyce Fitzpatrick
{"title":"Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians in Lebanon","authors":"Maha A. Habre ,&nbsp;Mary Dolansky ,&nbsp;Marilyn Lotas ,&nbsp;Souha Allam ,&nbsp;Joyce Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This cross-sectional mixed-methods study includes description of nurse-physician collaboration in Lebanon and comparison of perceptions of collaborative practice experiences of nurses and physicians. Online surveys were completed by 223 Registered Nurses<span> (RNs) and 60 Physicians (MDs) currently practicing in in-hospital settings in Lebanon. The Nurse-Physician Collaboration scale, demographic and background items, and four open-ended questions were included in the survey. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses, correlations, and categorical analyses were conducted. RNs reported significantly less frequency of collaboration than MDs (t = 2.62, p = 0.009). Females reported significantly less collaboration frequency than males (t = −3.44, p = 0.001). Stratifying by gender, male MDs reported the highest collaboration compared with male RNs (t = 2.25; p = 0.027). RNs with graduate degrees reported the least collaboration compared to holders of Bachelor's degrees and technical diplomas (F = 4.00, p = 0.02). Across both professions, motivation was the most frequently perceived and highest ranked facilitator for collaboration, and time pressure was the most frequently perceived and top ranked barrier. Of those who responded to an open-ended question, the majority of respondents (58.5%) shared a positive recent experience of nurse-physician collaboration, and 85% of responses to another question identified achievement of best quality patient outcomes as a perceived benefit of nurse-physician collaboration. Strategies that enhance the identified facilitators, overcome barriers, and equip nurses and physicians to collaborate should be implemented within hospitals in Lebanon.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional mixed-methods study includes description of nurse-physician collaboration in Lebanon and comparison of perceptions of collaborative practice experiences of nurses and physicians. Online surveys were completed by 223 Registered Nurses (RNs) and 60 Physicians (MDs) currently practicing in in-hospital settings in Lebanon. The Nurse-Physician Collaboration scale, demographic and background items, and four open-ended questions were included in the survey. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses, correlations, and categorical analyses were conducted. RNs reported significantly less frequency of collaboration than MDs (t = 2.62, p = 0.009). Females reported significantly less collaboration frequency than males (t = −3.44, p = 0.001). Stratifying by gender, male MDs reported the highest collaboration compared with male RNs (t = 2.25; p = 0.027). RNs with graduate degrees reported the least collaboration compared to holders of Bachelor's degrees and technical diplomas (F = 4.00, p = 0.02). Across both professions, motivation was the most frequently perceived and highest ranked facilitator for collaboration, and time pressure was the most frequently perceived and top ranked barrier. Of those who responded to an open-ended question, the majority of respondents (58.5%) shared a positive recent experience of nurse-physician collaboration, and 85% of responses to another question identified achievement of best quality patient outcomes as a perceived benefit of nurse-physician collaboration. Strategies that enhance the identified facilitators, overcome barriers, and equip nurses and physicians to collaborate should be implemented within hospitals in Lebanon.

黎巴嫩护士和医生之间的跨专业合作
这个横断面混合方法的研究包括黎巴嫩护士-医生合作的描述和比较的看法,护士和医生的合作实践经验。在线调查由目前在黎巴嫩医院执业的223名注册护士(RNs)和60名医生(md)完成。调查包括护士-医生合作量表、人口统计和背景项目以及四个开放式问题。进行描述性和比较统计分析、相关性和分类分析。注册护士报告的合作频率明显低于MDs (t = 2.62, p = 0.009)。女性报告的合作频率显著低于男性(t = - 3.44, p = 0.001)。按性别分层,与男性注册护士相比,男性医学博士报告的合作程度最高(t = 2.25;p = 0.027)。与持有学士学位和技术文凭的注册护士相比,拥有研究生学位的注册护士报告的合作最少(F = 4.00, p = 0.02)。在这两个职业中,动机是最常被感知到的,也是排名最高的合作促进因素,而时间压力是最常被感知到的,也是排名最高的障碍。在回答开放式问题的受访者中,大多数受访者(58.5%)分享了近期护士-医生合作的积极经历,而对另一个问题的85%的受访者认为,护士-医生合作的好处是实现最佳质量的患者治疗结果。应在黎巴嫩的医院内实施加强已确定的促进因素、克服障碍并使护士和医生具备合作能力的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信