Negativity spreads faster: A large-scale multilingual twitter analysis on the role of sentiment in political communication

Q1 Social Sciences
Dimosthenis Antypas, Alun Preece, Jose Camacho-Collados
{"title":"Negativity spreads faster: A large-scale multilingual twitter analysis on the role of sentiment in political communication","authors":"Dimosthenis Antypas,&nbsp;Alun Preece,&nbsp;Jose Camacho-Collados","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social media has become extremely influential when it comes to policy making in modern societies, especially in the western world, where platforms such as Twitter allow users to follow politicians, thus making citizens more involved in political discussion. In the same vein, politicians use Twitter to express their opinions, debate among others on current topics and promote their political agendas aiming to influence voter behaviour. In this paper, we attempt to analyse tweets of politicians from three European countries and explore the virality of their tweets. Previous studies have shown that tweets conveying negative sentiment are likely to be retweeted more frequently. By utilising state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we performed sentiment analysis on hundreds of thousands of tweets collected from members of parliament in Greece, Spain and the United Kingdom, including devolved administrations. We achieved this by systematically exploring and analysing the differences between influential and less popular tweets. Our analysis indicates that politicians’ negatively charged tweets spread more widely, especially in more recent times, and highlights interesting differences between political parties as well as between politicians and the general population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Social media has become extremely influential when it comes to policy making in modern societies, especially in the western world, where platforms such as Twitter allow users to follow politicians, thus making citizens more involved in political discussion. In the same vein, politicians use Twitter to express their opinions, debate among others on current topics and promote their political agendas aiming to influence voter behaviour. In this paper, we attempt to analyse tweets of politicians from three European countries and explore the virality of their tweets. Previous studies have shown that tweets conveying negative sentiment are likely to be retweeted more frequently. By utilising state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we performed sentiment analysis on hundreds of thousands of tweets collected from members of parliament in Greece, Spain and the United Kingdom, including devolved administrations. We achieved this by systematically exploring and analysing the differences between influential and less popular tweets. Our analysis indicates that politicians’ negatively charged tweets spread more widely, especially in more recent times, and highlights interesting differences between political parties as well as between politicians and the general population.

消极性传播得更快:对政治传播中情绪作用的大规模多语种twitter分析
在现代社会的政策制定中,社交媒体已经变得极具影响力,尤其是在西方世界,推特等平台允许用户关注政客,从而使公民更多地参与政治讨论。同样,政客们使用推特表达自己的观点,就当前话题进行辩论,并宣传旨在影响选民行为的政治议程。在本文中,我们试图分析来自三个欧洲国家的政治家的推文,并探讨他们推文的病毒性。先前的研究表明,传达负面情绪的推文可能会被转发得更频繁。通过使用最先进的预先训练的语言模型,我们对从希腊、西班牙和英国议会议员(包括权力下放的政府)收集的数十万条推文进行了情绪分析。我们通过系统地探索和分析有影响力的推文和不太受欢迎的推文之间的差异来实现这一点。我们的分析表明,政客们的负面推文传播得更广,尤其是在最近的时代,并突出了政党之间以及政客和普通民众之间的有趣差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信