Management of composite tibial and soft tissue defects via intramedullary bone transport devices and microvascular free flaps: A treatment algorithm and presentation of two cases

Corey M. Bascone , Cody C. Fowler , J. Reed McGraw , Robyn B. Broach , Samir Mehta , L. Scott Levin , Stephen J. Kovach
{"title":"Management of composite tibial and soft tissue defects via intramedullary bone transport devices and microvascular free flaps: A treatment algorithm and presentation of two cases","authors":"Corey M. Bascone ,&nbsp;Cody C. Fowler ,&nbsp;J. Reed McGraw ,&nbsp;Robyn B. Broach ,&nbsp;Samir Mehta ,&nbsp;L. Scott Levin ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Kovach","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2023.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tibial malunion and nonunion are complications that may follow the repair of traumatic tibial shaft fractures. Management may sometime require osteotomy and bone transport. In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of intercalary tibial defects away from bone transport via external fixation towards intramedullary lengthening nails. This shift necessitates a re-evaluation of the approach to infection and soft tissue defects.</p></div><div><h3>Cases</h3><p>We describe the case of a young man with a two-year history of infected tibial nonunion who underwent osteotomy and debridement before requiring free tissue transfer and eventual bone transport. Second, we present the case of a middle-aged man with a 30-year history of infected tibial malunion. Prior to placement of the intramedullary nail, debridement and osteotomy were performed, followed by two free anterolateral thigh flaps and tissue rearrangement.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The use of free tissue transfers and emphasis on achieving an anatomically correct lower extremity prior to the initiation of bone transport resulted in minimal external fixation time, treatment compliance, and satisfactory clinical outcomes. Although multiple treatments can produce successful bone transport, no cohesive treatment algorithm exists that addresses infection, external fixation time, healing, and psychological burden.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The paradigm shift towards intramedullary bone transport devices requires the use of antibiotic implants and prioritization of the soft tissue envelope prior to device implantation to prevent hardware infection and reoperation. An algorithmic management approach by an orthoplastic surgical team that includes an orthopedic surgeon and microsurgeon is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X2300012X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tibial malunion and nonunion are complications that may follow the repair of traumatic tibial shaft fractures. Management may sometime require osteotomy and bone transport. In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of intercalary tibial defects away from bone transport via external fixation towards intramedullary lengthening nails. This shift necessitates a re-evaluation of the approach to infection and soft tissue defects.

Cases

We describe the case of a young man with a two-year history of infected tibial nonunion who underwent osteotomy and debridement before requiring free tissue transfer and eventual bone transport. Second, we present the case of a middle-aged man with a 30-year history of infected tibial malunion. Prior to placement of the intramedullary nail, debridement and osteotomy were performed, followed by two free anterolateral thigh flaps and tissue rearrangement.

Discussion

The use of free tissue transfers and emphasis on achieving an anatomically correct lower extremity prior to the initiation of bone transport resulted in minimal external fixation time, treatment compliance, and satisfactory clinical outcomes. Although multiple treatments can produce successful bone transport, no cohesive treatment algorithm exists that addresses infection, external fixation time, healing, and psychological burden.

Conclusion

The paradigm shift towards intramedullary bone transport devices requires the use of antibiotic implants and prioritization of the soft tissue envelope prior to device implantation to prevent hardware infection and reoperation. An algorithmic management approach by an orthoplastic surgical team that includes an orthopedic surgeon and microsurgeon is recommended.

经髓内骨运输装置及微血管游离皮瓣治疗胫骨及软组织复合缺损:一种治疗方法及两例报告
背景胫骨畸形愈合和不愈合是创伤性胫骨干骨折修复后可能出现的并发症。治疗有时需要截骨和骨运输。近年来,对于胫骨骨间缺损的治疗模式发生了转变,从通过外固定骨转移到髓内延长钉。这种转变需要对治疗感染和软组织缺损的方法进行重新评估。我们描述了一个病例的年轻男子感染胫骨骨不连两年的历史,谁接受截骨和清创前需要自由组织转移和最终骨运输。其次,我们提出的情况下,一个中年男子有30年的历史感染胫骨畸形愈合。在放置髓内钉之前,行清创和截骨术,随后行两个游离大腿前外侧皮瓣和组织重排。游离组织移植的使用和强调在骨运输开始之前实现解剖正确的下肢导致最小的外固定时间,治疗依从性和令人满意的临床结果。虽然多种治疗方法都可以实现成功的骨运输,但目前还没有统一的治疗方法来解决感染、外固定时间、愈合和心理负担问题。结论髓内骨运输装置的发展模式转变需要使用抗生素植入物,并在植入装置之前优先考虑软组织包膜,以防止硬件感染和再次手术。建议由包括整形外科医生和显微外科医生在内的整形外科团队采用算法管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信