Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ikwinder Preet Kaur , Mohsin Sheraz Mughal , Fawad Aslam , Jennifer Schram , Pankaj Bansal
{"title":"Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review","authors":"Ikwinder Preet Kaur ,&nbsp;Mohsin Sheraz Mughal ,&nbsp;Fawad Aslam ,&nbsp;Jennifer Schram ,&nbsp;Pankaj Bansal","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2023.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case–control and cohort studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X23000955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case–control and cohort studies.

Results

For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.

无菌性鹰嘴滑囊炎的非手术治疗:系统综述
目的鹰嘴滑囊炎(OB)是一种常见的门诊疾病,以鹰嘴滑囊炎症和积液为特征。关于逐步和标准化的无菌OB治疗方法和囊内皮质类固醇注射(CSI)的疗效,数据是不一致的。本综述的目的是系统评价无菌性腹膜炎的非手术治疗方案。方法本综述按照PRISMA的建议进行。在5个医学数据库中进行英文和非英文文献检索,以确定评估OB治疗的研究。所有纳入的研究均使用随机对照试验(rct)的修订Cochrane RoB工具评估偏倚风险(RoB),病例对照和队列研究使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估偏倚风险。结果最终分析纳入2项随机对照试验和2项观察性研究。这两项随机对照试验的RoB都很高,并且在各种侵入性和非侵入性治疗方案中,都未能证明OB和法氏囊压痛的消退有显著差异。皮质类固醇注射(CSI)与症状持续时间的显著下降有关。然而,它与更高数量的并发症相关,包括法氏囊感染和皮肤萎缩。结论根据现有资料,如果在病程早期采用保守方法,无菌OB的临床解决方案似乎可以实现。虽然CSI比其他治疗方法更有效,但由于并发症发生率较高,应保留用于难治性病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信