Calibration rod selection strategy in RCSA-based method for reliable calculation of milling tool-tip FRFs in rotating conditions

IF 14 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Yulei Ji , Yangbo Yu , Qingzhen Bi , Huan Zhao
{"title":"Calibration rod selection strategy in RCSA-based method for reliable calculation of milling tool-tip FRFs in rotating conditions","authors":"Yulei Ji ,&nbsp;Yangbo Yu ,&nbsp;Qingzhen Bi ,&nbsp;Huan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2023.104016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The measurement of milling tool-tip frequency response functions (FRFs) in rotating conditions is challenging in practice. Methods based on the receptance coupling substructure analysis (RCSA) can obtain rotating tool-tip FRFs using normal modal test devices; thus, they have received extensive attention in the research community. The typical RCSA framework first adopts a calibration rod for measuring rotating FRFs. Then, it analytically calculates the desired tool-tip FRFs through the RCSA theory. As the calculation process involves matrix inversion, high-quality FRF data is required. However, experimentally measured FRFs in rotating structures contain severe noise, leading to an unreliable calculation. This paper presents a novel error analysis model to investigate the propagation mechanism of measurement errors in the typical RCSA framework. Results show that measurement errors would cause errors in the length of the coupled substructure while introducing scaling effects. The calibration rod is found to be vital for RCSA calculation reliability. The patterns of the calculation error are opposed when adopting a short or long calibration rod. Then, a calibration rod selection strategy is proposed. The strategy makes full use of the high measurement quality near the resonance in rotating FRFs and achieves the dominant mode frequency matching between the clamped rod and the clamped tool by adjusting the rod length. Simulations validate the error analysis model and the calibration rod selection strategy. Experimental results also show that the optimal selection of the calibration rod could improve the calculation reliability of rotating tool-tip FRFs in the typical RCSA framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 104016"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089069552300024X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurement of milling tool-tip frequency response functions (FRFs) in rotating conditions is challenging in practice. Methods based on the receptance coupling substructure analysis (RCSA) can obtain rotating tool-tip FRFs using normal modal test devices; thus, they have received extensive attention in the research community. The typical RCSA framework first adopts a calibration rod for measuring rotating FRFs. Then, it analytically calculates the desired tool-tip FRFs through the RCSA theory. As the calculation process involves matrix inversion, high-quality FRF data is required. However, experimentally measured FRFs in rotating structures contain severe noise, leading to an unreliable calculation. This paper presents a novel error analysis model to investigate the propagation mechanism of measurement errors in the typical RCSA framework. Results show that measurement errors would cause errors in the length of the coupled substructure while introducing scaling effects. The calibration rod is found to be vital for RCSA calculation reliability. The patterns of the calculation error are opposed when adopting a short or long calibration rod. Then, a calibration rod selection strategy is proposed. The strategy makes full use of the high measurement quality near the resonance in rotating FRFs and achieves the dominant mode frequency matching between the clamped rod and the clamped tool by adjusting the rod length. Simulations validate the error analysis model and the calibration rod selection strategy. Experimental results also show that the optimal selection of the calibration rod could improve the calculation reliability of rotating tool-tip FRFs in the typical RCSA framework.

Abstract Image

基于rcsa的旋转工况铣刀刀尖频响可靠计算方法的标定杆选择策略
铣刀刀尖在旋转条件下的频响函数测量在实践中具有挑战性。基于接收耦合子结构分析(RCSA)的方法可以利用正态模态试验装置获得旋转刀尖频响;因此,它们在研究界受到了广泛的关注。典型的RCSA框架首先采用校准杆测量旋转频响。然后,通过RCSA理论解析计算出所需的工具尖频响。由于计算过程涉及矩阵反演,需要高质量的频响数据。然而,实验测量的旋转结构的频响包含严重的噪声,导致计算不可靠。提出了一种新的误差分析模型,研究了典型RCSA框架中测量误差的传播机制。结果表明,测量误差在引入尺度效应的同时会引起耦合子结构长度的误差。标定杆对RCSA计算的可靠性至关重要。采用短刻度棒和长刻度棒时,计算误差的规律是相反的。然后,提出了一种标定棒的选择策略。该策略充分利用旋转频响中谐振附近的高测量质量,通过调整杆长实现夹紧杆与夹紧工具的优势模态频率匹配。仿真验证了误差分析模型和标定棒选择策略。实验结果还表明,在典型的RCSA框架下,标定杆的优化选择可以提高旋转刀尖频响的计算可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture is dedicated to advancing scientific comprehension of the fundamental mechanics involved in processes and machines utilized in the manufacturing of engineering components. While the primary focus is on metals, the journal also explores applications in composites, ceramics, and other structural or functional materials. The coverage includes a diverse range of topics: - Essential mechanics of processes involving material removal, accretion, and deformation, encompassing solid, semi-solid, or particulate forms. - Significant scientific advancements in existing or new processes and machines. - In-depth characterization of workpiece materials (structure/surfaces) through advanced techniques (e.g., SEM, EDS, TEM, EBSD, AES, Raman spectroscopy) to unveil new phenomenological aspects governing manufacturing processes. - Tool design, utilization, and comprehensive studies of failure mechanisms. - Innovative concepts of machine tools, fixtures, and tool holders supported by modeling and demonstrations relevant to manufacturing processes within the journal's scope. - Novel scientific contributions exploring interactions between the machine tool, control system, software design, and processes. - Studies elucidating specific mechanisms governing niche processes (e.g., ultra-high precision, nano/atomic level manufacturing with either mechanical or non-mechanical "tools"). - Innovative approaches, underpinned by thorough scientific analysis, addressing emerging or breakthrough processes (e.g., bio-inspired manufacturing) and/or applications (e.g., ultra-high precision optics).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信