Mobile apps against food waste: Are consumers willing to use them? A survey research on Italian consumers

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Luca Fraccascia , Alberto Nastasi
{"title":"Mobile apps against food waste: Are consumers willing to use them? A survey research on Italian consumers","authors":"Luca Fraccascia ,&nbsp;Alberto Nastasi","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is aimed at analyzing the consumers’ willingness to use mobile apps that claim to contribute to mitigating the food waste problem. We study the extent to which such willingness is influenced by three factors related to the consumers’ willingness to use mobile apps in general (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived risks) and three factors related to the consumer behavior against food waste (food neophobia, moral attitude, and knowledge about food conservation). A survey was conducted on 283 Italian consumers. Results show that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use positively affect the willingness to use mobile apps against food waste, while perceived risks by potential users negatively impact such willingness. However, none of the three consumer-related factors has been proved to be significant. The results of this paper offer managerial implications to developers, related to how to advertise the app and how to improve the app functionality, in order to enhance the consumers’ willingness to use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 200150"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378923000226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is aimed at analyzing the consumers’ willingness to use mobile apps that claim to contribute to mitigating the food waste problem. We study the extent to which such willingness is influenced by three factors related to the consumers’ willingness to use mobile apps in general (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived risks) and three factors related to the consumer behavior against food waste (food neophobia, moral attitude, and knowledge about food conservation). A survey was conducted on 283 Italian consumers. Results show that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use positively affect the willingness to use mobile apps against food waste, while perceived risks by potential users negatively impact such willingness. However, none of the three consumer-related factors has been proved to be significant. The results of this paper offer managerial implications to developers, related to how to advertise the app and how to improve the app functionality, in order to enhance the consumers’ willingness to use.

反对食物浪费的移动应用程序:消费者愿意使用它们吗?对意大利消费者的调查研究
本文旨在分析消费者使用声称有助于减轻食物浪费问题的移动应用程序的意愿。我们研究了消费者使用移动应用程序意愿的三个因素(感知有用性、感知易用性和感知风险)和消费者反对食物浪费行为的三个因素(食物恐惧症、道德态度和食物节约知识)对这种意愿的影响程度。对283名意大利消费者进行了调查。结果表明,感知有用性和感知易用性正向影响使用移动应用程序反对食物浪费的意愿,而潜在用户感知风险负向影响这种意愿。然而,这三个与消费者相关的因素都没有被证明是重要的。本文的研究结果为开发者提供了管理启示,涉及到如何为应用做广告,如何改进应用的功能,以提高消费者的使用意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信