Model utility of a deep learning-based segmentation is not Dice coefficient dependent: A case study in volumetric brain blood vessel segmentation

Mohammadali Alidoost , Vahid Ghodrati , Amirhossein Ahmadian , Abbas Shafiee , Cameron H. Hassani , Arash Bedayat , Jennifer L. Wilson
{"title":"Model utility of a deep learning-based segmentation is not Dice coefficient dependent: A case study in volumetric brain blood vessel segmentation","authors":"Mohammadali Alidoost ,&nbsp;Vahid Ghodrati ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Ahmadian ,&nbsp;Abbas Shafiee ,&nbsp;Cameron H. Hassani ,&nbsp;Arash Bedayat ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2023.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cerebrovascular disease is one of the world's leading causes of death. Blood vessel segmentation is a primary stage in diagnosing. Although a few deep neural networks have been suggested to automate volumetric brain blood vessel segmentation, few studies have considered the relevance of the evaluation metrics to diagnosing cerebrovascular disease due to the complicated nature of this task. This study aimed to understand if brain vasculature segmentation using a convolutional neural network (CNN) could meet radiologists' requirements for disease diagnosis. We employed a deeply supervised attention-gated 3D U-Net trained based on the Focal Tversky loss function to extract brain vasculatures from volumetric magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images. Here we show that our training procedure led to biologically relevant results despite not scoring well using the Dice score, a common metric for algorithm evaluation. We achieved Dice (±SD) = 0.71 ± 0.02 and two radiologists confirmed and validated that our method successfully captured the major blood vessel branches of the circle of Willis (CoW) having biological importance, including internal carotid artery (ICA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA). Adding radiologists' expert opinions, we could fill this gap that using only the current common evaluation metrics, such as the Dice coefficient, is not enough for brain vessel segmentation assessment. These results suggest the additional value for computational approaches that are designed with end-user stakeholders in mind.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521223000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cerebrovascular disease is one of the world's leading causes of death. Blood vessel segmentation is a primary stage in diagnosing. Although a few deep neural networks have been suggested to automate volumetric brain blood vessel segmentation, few studies have considered the relevance of the evaluation metrics to diagnosing cerebrovascular disease due to the complicated nature of this task. This study aimed to understand if brain vasculature segmentation using a convolutional neural network (CNN) could meet radiologists' requirements for disease diagnosis. We employed a deeply supervised attention-gated 3D U-Net trained based on the Focal Tversky loss function to extract brain vasculatures from volumetric magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images. Here we show that our training procedure led to biologically relevant results despite not scoring well using the Dice score, a common metric for algorithm evaluation. We achieved Dice (±SD) = 0.71 ± 0.02 and two radiologists confirmed and validated that our method successfully captured the major blood vessel branches of the circle of Willis (CoW) having biological importance, including internal carotid artery (ICA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA). Adding radiologists' expert opinions, we could fill this gap that using only the current common evaluation metrics, such as the Dice coefficient, is not enough for brain vessel segmentation assessment. These results suggest the additional value for computational approaches that are designed with end-user stakeholders in mind.

基于深度学习的分割的模型效用不依赖于骰子系数:容量脑血管分割的案例研究
脑血管疾病是世界上主要的死亡原因之一。血管分割是诊断的初级阶段。虽然一些深度神经网络已经被建议用于自动化容量脑血管分割,但由于这项任务的复杂性,很少有研究考虑评估指标与脑血管疾病诊断的相关性。本研究旨在了解使用卷积神经网络(CNN)进行脑血管分割是否能满足放射科医生对疾病诊断的要求。我们采用基于Focal Tversky损失函数训练的深度监督注意力门控3D U-Net从体积磁共振血管成像(MRA)图像中提取脑血管。在这里,我们展示了我们的训练过程导致了生物学相关的结果,尽管使用Dice分数(算法评估的常用指标)得分不高。我们获得了Dice(±SD) = 0.71±0.02,两位放射科医生证实并验证了我们的方法成功捕获了具有生物学重要性的威氏圈(CoW)的主要血管分支,包括颈内动脉(ICA)、大脑中动脉(MCA)、大脑前动脉(ACA)和大脑后动脉(PCA)。加上放射科医生的专家意见,我们可以填补仅使用目前常用的评估指标(如Dice系数)不足以进行脑血管分割评估的空白。这些结果表明,在设计时考虑到最终用户利益相关者的计算方法的附加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信