Eco-anxiety in daily life: Relationships with well-being and pro-environmental behavior

Paul K. Lutz , John M. Zelenski , David B. Newman
{"title":"Eco-anxiety in daily life: Relationships with well-being and pro-environmental behavior","authors":"Paul K. Lutz ,&nbsp;John M. Zelenski ,&nbsp;David B. Newman","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior research on <em>eco-anxiety</em>, or anxiety and worry about mounting environmental issues, has almost exclusively relied on cross-sectional trait reports. Consequently, little is known about how it is related to focal outcomes, such as well-being (e.g., happiness, meaning in life) and pro-environmental behavior, over time in daily life. To help address this issue, we conducted a preregistered daily diary study, wherein Canadian undergraduates (<em>N</em> = 132) provided trait reports and two weeks of daily reports (<em>n</em> = 1439) on eco-anxiety, positive and negative affect, meaning in life, and pro-environmental behavior. At the trait level, average scores on eco-anxiety were fairly low; yet, higher scores were associated with less positive affect and more negative affect and pro-environmental behavior. Average scores on eco-anxiety were even lower at the state level but nonetheless exhibited notable within-person variability. On days that people felt greater eco-anxiety, they also reported greater negative affect and pro-environmental behavior. Lagged analyses from one day to the next provided some evidence that eco-anxiety increases future negative affect. No significant relationships between eco-anxiety and meaning in life emerged at both levels of analysis. Together, these findings demonstrate that eco-anxiety can be productively conceived of—and studied as—both a trait and a state.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Prior research on eco-anxiety, or anxiety and worry about mounting environmental issues, has almost exclusively relied on cross-sectional trait reports. Consequently, little is known about how it is related to focal outcomes, such as well-being (e.g., happiness, meaning in life) and pro-environmental behavior, over time in daily life. To help address this issue, we conducted a preregistered daily diary study, wherein Canadian undergraduates (N = 132) provided trait reports and two weeks of daily reports (n = 1439) on eco-anxiety, positive and negative affect, meaning in life, and pro-environmental behavior. At the trait level, average scores on eco-anxiety were fairly low; yet, higher scores were associated with less positive affect and more negative affect and pro-environmental behavior. Average scores on eco-anxiety were even lower at the state level but nonetheless exhibited notable within-person variability. On days that people felt greater eco-anxiety, they also reported greater negative affect and pro-environmental behavior. Lagged analyses from one day to the next provided some evidence that eco-anxiety increases future negative affect. No significant relationships between eco-anxiety and meaning in life emerged at both levels of analysis. Together, these findings demonstrate that eco-anxiety can be productively conceived of—and studied as—both a trait and a state.

Abstract Image

日常生活中的生态焦虑:与幸福感和环保行为的关系
先前关于生态焦虑或对日益严重的环境问题的焦虑和担忧的研究几乎完全依赖于横断面特征报告。因此,随着时间的推移,人们对它与日常生活中的焦点结果(如幸福感、生活意义)和环保行为之间的关系知之甚少。为了帮助解决这个问题,我们进行了一项预先登记的日常日记研究,其中加拿大本科生(N=132)提供了关于生态焦虑、积极和消极影响、生活意义和环保行为的特质报告和两周的日常报告(N=1439)。在特质水平上,生态焦虑的平均得分相当低;然而,更高的分数与更少的积极影响、更多的消极影响和环保行为有关。生态焦虑的平均得分在州一级甚至更低,但仍表现出显著的人内变异性。在人们感到更大的生态焦虑的日子里,他们也报告了更大的负面影响和环保行为。从一天到下一天的滞后分析提供了一些证据,表明生态焦虑会增加未来的负面影响。在两个层面的分析中,生态焦虑和生活意义之间都没有出现显著的关系。总之,这些发现表明,生态焦虑可以被有效地视为一种特质和一种状态,并进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信