How Did Darwin Prefer His Tea?

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Georgios Ampatzidis, Marida Ergazaki
{"title":"How Did Darwin Prefer His Tea?","authors":"Georgios Ampatzidis,&nbsp;Marida Ergazaki","doi":"10.1007/s11191-021-00305-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature of science (NOS) is considered an important component of scientific literacy. Supporting students to develop a comprehensive NOS understanding is one of the most commonly described objectives within science education. Moreover, history of science can arguably provide a good context for NOS teaching and learning; it has been suggested that using historical contexts to introduce general NOS aspects in an explicit, systematic way can enhance students’ understanding about NOS. This paper has to do with a research project concerned with the creation of historical narratives that draw specifically on the history of the idea of the Balance of Nature (BON)—a persistent, socio-culturally originated idea that implies a predetermined order and stability in the natural world—in order to support university students to better understand some general NOS aspects. In particular, we report on our narrative entitled “Tea for two” which sets focus on the socio-cultural embeddedness of science. More specifically, we (a) give an overview of what we drew upon in order to create “Tea for two” (the BON-idea history and the types of historical narratives for educational use), (b) highlight the historical background of “Tea for two” and present the narrative itself, (c) discuss “Tea for two” in terms of its essential features and the strategies we considered, and (d) make some final remarks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"37 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-021-00305-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nature of science (NOS) is considered an important component of scientific literacy. Supporting students to develop a comprehensive NOS understanding is one of the most commonly described objectives within science education. Moreover, history of science can arguably provide a good context for NOS teaching and learning; it has been suggested that using historical contexts to introduce general NOS aspects in an explicit, systematic way can enhance students’ understanding about NOS. This paper has to do with a research project concerned with the creation of historical narratives that draw specifically on the history of the idea of the Balance of Nature (BON)—a persistent, socio-culturally originated idea that implies a predetermined order and stability in the natural world—in order to support university students to better understand some general NOS aspects. In particular, we report on our narrative entitled “Tea for two” which sets focus on the socio-cultural embeddedness of science. More specifically, we (a) give an overview of what we drew upon in order to create “Tea for two” (the BON-idea history and the types of historical narratives for educational use), (b) highlight the historical background of “Tea for two” and present the narrative itself, (c) discuss “Tea for two” in terms of its essential features and the strategies we considered, and (d) make some final remarks.

达尔文喜欢喝茶吗?
科学本质(NOS)被认为是科学素养的重要组成部分。支持学生发展对NOS的全面理解是科学教育中最常见的目标之一。此外,科学史可以说可以为NOS的教学提供良好的背景;有人建议,利用历史背景以一种明确、系统的方式介绍NOS的一般方面,可以增强学生对NOS的理解。本文涉及一个研究项目,该项目涉及历史叙事的创作,特别是利用自然平衡(BON)这一持久的,社会文化起源的想法,暗示了自然世界的预定秩序和稳定性,以支持大学生更好地理解NOS的一些一般方面。特别是,我们报告了我们题为“两个人的茶”的叙述,它将重点放在科学的社会文化嵌入性上。更具体地说,我们(a)概述了我们为了创造“两人份茶”所借鉴的东西(邦思想的历史和用于教育用途的历史叙事类型),(b)突出了“两人份茶”的历史背景并呈现了叙事本身,(c)讨论了“两人份茶”的基本特征和我们考虑的策略,(d)做了一些最后的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education.  Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science.  The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes.  The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy.  Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信