Mid-level health providers (MLHPs) in delivering and improving access to primary health care services – a narrative review

Vishal Chauhan , Neha Dumka , Erin Hannah , Tarannum Ahmed , Atul Kotwal
{"title":"Mid-level health providers (MLHPs) in delivering and improving access to primary health care services – a narrative review","authors":"Vishal Chauhan ,&nbsp;Neha Dumka ,&nbsp;Erin Hannah ,&nbsp;Tarannum Ahmed ,&nbsp;Atul Kotwal","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For primary healthcare systems to bring care closer to the communities, the availability of appropriate human resources is crucial. The primary care workforce in the world is expanding to include non-physician health workers (NPHWs) to increase its capacity. Also, NPHWs as mid-level health providers (MLHPs) are currently being employed in high- and low-income countries to assist doctors and specialists to make up for the scarcity of health professionals. Given the wide prevalence in the deployment of NPHWs as mid-level health providers, this article collates recent evidence on the role of MLHPs in improving access to primary healthcare services, and their enablers and barriers in integrating them in primary care teams. The article also presents gaps in evidence and recommendations for the way forward.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of contemporary literature published from January 2012 to September 2022 was undertaken using two bibliographic databases (PubMed and Cochrane) and hand searching the reference list of retrieved papers. Duplicates, papers older than ten years, and whose focus was not on primary healthcare were excluded. The papers finalised for appraisal were scrutinised for key themes and their summaries were collated for analysis. The papers comprised of twenty-four quantitative, twenty-three qualitative, and nine mixed approach study designs (<em>n</em> = 56) due to which a narrative approach was conducted as per guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The review identified and presents the following themes - task shifting and its effectiveness in service delivery, quality of care, enablers and barriers of NPHWs in primary health care in both HIC and LMIC settings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Task-shifting interventions need effective engagement and constant coordination with relevant stakeholders. For this, policymakers, public health researchers, healthcare professionals of all cadres and community members need to be involved across all stages of introduction and absorption of the cadre into the primary healthcare delivery system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For primary healthcare systems to bring care closer to the communities, the availability of appropriate human resources is crucial. The primary care workforce in the world is expanding to include non-physician health workers (NPHWs) to increase its capacity. Also, NPHWs as mid-level health providers (MLHPs) are currently being employed in high- and low-income countries to assist doctors and specialists to make up for the scarcity of health professionals. Given the wide prevalence in the deployment of NPHWs as mid-level health providers, this article collates recent evidence on the role of MLHPs in improving access to primary healthcare services, and their enablers and barriers in integrating them in primary care teams. The article also presents gaps in evidence and recommendations for the way forward.

Methods

A systematic search of contemporary literature published from January 2012 to September 2022 was undertaken using two bibliographic databases (PubMed and Cochrane) and hand searching the reference list of retrieved papers. Duplicates, papers older than ten years, and whose focus was not on primary healthcare were excluded. The papers finalised for appraisal were scrutinised for key themes and their summaries were collated for analysis. The papers comprised of twenty-four quantitative, twenty-three qualitative, and nine mixed approach study designs (n = 56) due to which a narrative approach was conducted as per guidelines.

Results

The review identified and presents the following themes - task shifting and its effectiveness in service delivery, quality of care, enablers and barriers of NPHWs in primary health care in both HIC and LMIC settings.

Conclusion

Task-shifting interventions need effective engagement and constant coordination with relevant stakeholders. For this, policymakers, public health researchers, healthcare professionals of all cadres and community members need to be involved across all stages of introduction and absorption of the cadre into the primary healthcare delivery system.

中级卫生保健提供者提供和改善获得初级卫生保健服务的机会——叙述性审查
背景为了使初级保健系统更接近社区,提供适当的人力资源至关重要。世界上的初级保健劳动力正在扩大,包括非医生卫生工作者(NPHW),以提高其能力。此外,NPHW作为中级卫生服务提供者,目前正受雇于高收入和低收入国家,以帮助医生和专家弥补卫生专业人员的短缺。鉴于NPHW作为中级卫生服务提供者的部署普遍存在,本文整理了MLHP在改善获得初级卫生保健服务方面的作用的最新证据,以及它们在将它们纳入初级卫生保健团队方面的推动者和障碍。这篇文章还介绍了证据方面的差距,并对今后的发展方向提出了建议。方法使用PubMed和Cochrane两个书目数据库对2012年1月至2022年9月发表的当代文献进行系统检索,并手工检索检索到的论文参考文献列表。复制品、超过十年的论文以及不关注初级保健的论文被排除在外。最后定稿供评估的论文对关键主题进行了仔细审查,并对其摘要进行了整理分析。这些论文包括24个定量、23个定性和9个混合方法研究设计(n=56),因此按照指南进行了叙述方法。结果该审查确定并提出了以下主题——在HIC和LMIC环境中,任务转移及其在服务提供中的有效性、护理质量、NPHW在初级卫生保健中的促进因素和障碍。结论任务转换干预措施需要与相关利益攸关方进行有效参与和持续协调。为此,政策制定者、公共卫生研究人员、所有干部的医疗保健专业人员和社区成员都需要参与将干部引入和吸收到初级医疗保健提供系统的各个阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信