Estimating uncertainties in 3-D models of complex fold-and-thrust belts: A case study of the Eastern Alps triangle zone

IF 2.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Sofia Brisson , Florian Wellmann , Nils Chudalla , Jan von Harten , Christoph von Hagke
{"title":"Estimating uncertainties in 3-D models of complex fold-and-thrust belts: A case study of the Eastern Alps triangle zone","authors":"Sofia Brisson ,&nbsp;Florian Wellmann ,&nbsp;Nils Chudalla ,&nbsp;Jan von Harten ,&nbsp;Christoph von Hagke","doi":"10.1016/j.acags.2023.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geological modeling commonly results in a single prescribed geometric representation of the subsurface with no consideration of uncertainties. Accounting for uncertainties is of particular importance in the triangle zone at the leading edge of deformation of the foreland fold-thrust belt of the European Alps, the Subalpine Molasse. Here, interpretations of the complex structures are limited to 2D and are based almost exclusively on subsurface data, lacking the constraint of surface data.</p><p>Implicit modeling can be used to create automated 3D model realizations considering parameter uncertainty. In this sense, multiple possible models can be assessed within the uncertainty range assigned. As implicit modeling often yields artifacts or geologically unfeasible scenarios, the concept of geological topology can be used to constrain the modeling outputs, so that only models without artifacts are considered into the final model ensemble.</p><p>Two experiments are designed to test out this workflow. The methodology is first tested using a very simple synthetic model, and later applied to a portion of the Subalpine Molasse, where different 2-D subsurface geometries have been proposed. For the first time, a 3D implicit model ensemble incorporating a full assessment of uncertainties is built in this area. Results show that it is feasible to use topological information for posterior model constraint, even in models of high structural complexity. To eliminate all non-meaningful models, however, it is necessary to use more than one topological constraint. A comparison of the prior and posterior model ensembles shows a correlation between model parameters and a shift in parameter probability density curves in the synthetic model experiment, and a decrease in entropy for both experiments. A topological constraint should thus be applied routinely when building a stochastic implicit model ensemble.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33804,"journal":{"name":"Applied Computing and Geosciences","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Computing and Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590197423000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geological modeling commonly results in a single prescribed geometric representation of the subsurface with no consideration of uncertainties. Accounting for uncertainties is of particular importance in the triangle zone at the leading edge of deformation of the foreland fold-thrust belt of the European Alps, the Subalpine Molasse. Here, interpretations of the complex structures are limited to 2D and are based almost exclusively on subsurface data, lacking the constraint of surface data.

Implicit modeling can be used to create automated 3D model realizations considering parameter uncertainty. In this sense, multiple possible models can be assessed within the uncertainty range assigned. As implicit modeling often yields artifacts or geologically unfeasible scenarios, the concept of geological topology can be used to constrain the modeling outputs, so that only models without artifacts are considered into the final model ensemble.

Two experiments are designed to test out this workflow. The methodology is first tested using a very simple synthetic model, and later applied to a portion of the Subalpine Molasse, where different 2-D subsurface geometries have been proposed. For the first time, a 3D implicit model ensemble incorporating a full assessment of uncertainties is built in this area. Results show that it is feasible to use topological information for posterior model constraint, even in models of high structural complexity. To eliminate all non-meaningful models, however, it is necessary to use more than one topological constraint. A comparison of the prior and posterior model ensembles shows a correlation between model parameters and a shift in parameter probability density curves in the synthetic model experiment, and a decrease in entropy for both experiments. A topological constraint should thus be applied routinely when building a stochastic implicit model ensemble.

复杂褶皱冲断带三维模型的不确定性估算:以东阿尔卑斯三角带为例
地质建模通常会产生地下的单一规定几何表示,而不考虑不确定性。在欧洲阿尔卑斯山前褶皱-逆冲带亚高山Molasse变形前缘的三角带中,考虑不确定性尤为重要。在这里,对复杂结构的解释仅限于2D,并且几乎完全基于地下数据,缺乏表面数据的约束。隐式建模可用于创建考虑参数不确定性的自动化三维模型实现。从这个意义上讲,可以在指定的不确定性范围内评估多个可能的模型。由于隐式建模通常会产生伪影或地质上不可行的场景,地质拓扑的概念可以用来约束建模输出,因此只有没有伪影的模型才会被考虑到最终的模型集合中。设计了两个实验来测试这个工作流程。该方法首先使用一个非常简单的合成模型进行测试,后来应用于亚高山Molasse的一部分,在那里提出了不同的二维地下几何形状。首次在该领域建立了一个包含不确定性全面评估的三维隐式模型集合。结果表明,即使在结构复杂度较高的模型中,使用拓扑信息进行后验模型约束也是可行的。然而,为了消除所有无意义的模型,有必要使用多个拓扑约束。先验和后验模型集合的比较显示了模型参数与合成模型实验中参数概率密度曲线的偏移之间的相关性,以及两个实验的熵的减小。因此,在构建随机隐式模型集合时,应常规应用拓扑约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Applied Computing and Geosciences Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信