Abel Joseph , Michel Kahaleh , Andrew A. Li , Gregory B. Haber , Prashant Kedia , Mai Ego Makiguchi , Neil R. Sharma , Joo Ha Hwang , Amitabh Chak , Ahmad M. Al-Taee , David Braun , Shaffer Mok , Neal A. Mehta , Emre Gorgun , John Vargo , Seiichiro Abe , Yutaka Saito , Tyler Stevens , Amit Bhatt
{"title":"Initial Multicenter Experience of Traction Wire Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection","authors":"Abel Joseph , Michel Kahaleh , Andrew A. Li , Gregory B. Haber , Prashant Kedia , Mai Ego Makiguchi , Neil R. Sharma , Joo Ha Hwang , Amitabh Chak , Ahmad M. Al-Taee , David Braun , Shaffer Mok , Neal A. Mehta , Emre Gorgun , John Vargo , Seiichiro Abe , Yutaka Saito , Tyler Stevens , Amit Bhatt","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically challenging and time-consuming procedure. A major limitation of ESD is the lack of a “second hand” to provide traction. We have developed a novel retraction device, a traction wire (TW), for ESD. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of TW-ESD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We initially evaluated TW-ESD in a randomized live pig study. After the device was approved for clinical use, we used it in patients<span> undergoing ESD at 8 academic centers in the United States and Japan. Data on demographics, procedural performance, histopathology, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed retrospectively.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Porcine study: In total, 12 ESDs were performed in random order in 3 live pigs. ESDs performed with TW had significantly shorter submucosal dissection time (7.0 ± 1.9 minutes vs 18.3 ± 3.4 minutes; <em>P</em> < 0.001) and shorter total ESD time (21.5 ± 4.1 minutes vs 29.5 ± 7.7 minutes; <em>P</em><span>= 0.049). TW was successfully deployed in all 103 study patients. The median device deployment time was 2 minutes (2, 3.0), and the median procedure time was 100.5 (65.50, 175.75) minutes. En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 98.1% (101/103) and 90.29% (93/103), respectively. The median ease of deployment and retrieval of the device on a 100-mm visual analog scale was 100 (80, 100). The median degree to which the device improved ease of procedure was 90 (77.5, 100). No adverse events related to the TW were seen.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The TW device was safe and efficient to use in ESD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030722000770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically challenging and time-consuming procedure. A major limitation of ESD is the lack of a “second hand” to provide traction. We have developed a novel retraction device, a traction wire (TW), for ESD. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of TW-ESD.
Methods
We initially evaluated TW-ESD in a randomized live pig study. After the device was approved for clinical use, we used it in patients undergoing ESD at 8 academic centers in the United States and Japan. Data on demographics, procedural performance, histopathology, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed retrospectively.
Results
Porcine study: In total, 12 ESDs were performed in random order in 3 live pigs. ESDs performed with TW had significantly shorter submucosal dissection time (7.0 ± 1.9 minutes vs 18.3 ± 3.4 minutes; P < 0.001) and shorter total ESD time (21.5 ± 4.1 minutes vs 29.5 ± 7.7 minutes; P= 0.049). TW was successfully deployed in all 103 study patients. The median device deployment time was 2 minutes (2, 3.0), and the median procedure time was 100.5 (65.50, 175.75) minutes. En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 98.1% (101/103) and 90.29% (93/103), respectively. The median ease of deployment and retrieval of the device on a 100-mm visual analog scale was 100 (80, 100). The median degree to which the device improved ease of procedure was 90 (77.5, 100). No adverse events related to the TW were seen.
Conclusion
The TW device was safe and efficient to use in ESD.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.