Joint decision-making of virtual module formation and scheduling considering queuing time

Liang Mei , Liu Yue , Shilun Ge
{"title":"Joint decision-making of virtual module formation and scheduling considering queuing time","authors":"Liang Mei ,&nbsp;Liu Yue ,&nbsp;Shilun Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.dsm.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Formation and scheduling are the most important decisions in the virtual modular manufacturing system; however, the global performance optimization of the system may be sacrificed via the superposition of two independent decision-making results. The joint decision of formation and scheduling is very important for system design. Complex and discrete manufacturing enterprises such as shipbuilding and aerospace often comprise multiple tasks, processes, and parallel machines, resulting in complex routes. The queuing time of parts in front of machines may account for 90% of the production cycle time. This study established a weighted allocation model of a formation-scheduling joint decision problem considering queuing time in system. To solve this nondeterministic polynomial (NP) problem, an adaptive differential evolution-simulated annealing (ADE-SA) algorithm is proposed. Compared with the standard differential evolution (DE) algorithm, the adaptive mutation factor overcomes the disadvantage that the scale of DE’s differential vector is difficult to control. The selection strategy of the SA algorithm compensates for the deficiency that DE’s greedy strategy may fall into a local optimal solution. The comparison results of four algorithms of a series of random examples demonstrate that the overall performance of ADE-SA is superior to the genetic algorithm, and average iteration, maximum completion time, and move time are 24%, 11%, and 7% lower than the average of other three algorithms, respectively. The method can generate the joint decision-making scheme with better overall performance, and effectively identify production bottlenecks through quantitative analysis of queuing time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100353,"journal":{"name":"Data Science and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Science and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666764923000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formation and scheduling are the most important decisions in the virtual modular manufacturing system; however, the global performance optimization of the system may be sacrificed via the superposition of two independent decision-making results. The joint decision of formation and scheduling is very important for system design. Complex and discrete manufacturing enterprises such as shipbuilding and aerospace often comprise multiple tasks, processes, and parallel machines, resulting in complex routes. The queuing time of parts in front of machines may account for 90% of the production cycle time. This study established a weighted allocation model of a formation-scheduling joint decision problem considering queuing time in system. To solve this nondeterministic polynomial (NP) problem, an adaptive differential evolution-simulated annealing (ADE-SA) algorithm is proposed. Compared with the standard differential evolution (DE) algorithm, the adaptive mutation factor overcomes the disadvantage that the scale of DE’s differential vector is difficult to control. The selection strategy of the SA algorithm compensates for the deficiency that DE’s greedy strategy may fall into a local optimal solution. The comparison results of four algorithms of a series of random examples demonstrate that the overall performance of ADE-SA is superior to the genetic algorithm, and average iteration, maximum completion time, and move time are 24%, 11%, and 7% lower than the average of other three algorithms, respectively. The method can generate the joint decision-making scheme with better overall performance, and effectively identify production bottlenecks through quantitative analysis of queuing time.

考虑排队时间的虚拟模块形成与调度联合决策
组建和调度是虚拟模块化制造系统中最重要的决策;然而,两个独立决策结果的叠加可能会牺牲系统的全局性能优化。编队和调度的联合决策对系统设计非常重要。造船和航空航天等复杂和离散的制造企业通常包括多个任务、流程和并行机器,导致路线复杂。零件在机器前的排队时间可能占生产周期时间的90%。建立了考虑排队时间的编队调度联合决策问题的加权分配模型。为了解决这一不确定性多项式(NP)问题,提出了一种自适应微分进化模拟退火(ADE-SA)算法。与标准差分进化算法相比,自适应变异因子克服了差分向量的规模难以控制的缺点。SA算法的选择策略弥补了DE的贪婪策略可能陷入局部最优解的不足。一系列随机实例的四种算法的比较结果表明,ADE-SA的整体性能优于遗传算法,平均迭代次数、最大完成时间和移动时间分别比其他三种算法的平均值低24%、11%和7%。该方法可以生成综合性能较好的联合决策方案,并通过对排队时间的定量分析,有效识别生产瓶颈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信