Wellbore leakage risk management in CO2 geological utilization and storage: A review

Xuebin Su , Sinan Liu , Liwei Zhang , Guizhen Liu , Yan Wang , Manguang Gan , Xiaochun Li
{"title":"Wellbore leakage risk management in CO2 geological utilization and storage: A review","authors":"Xuebin Su ,&nbsp;Sinan Liu ,&nbsp;Liwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Guizhen Liu ,&nbsp;Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Manguang Gan ,&nbsp;Xiaochun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.enrev.2023.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CO<sub>2</sub> geological utilization and storage (CGUS) is an important technology to achieve a deep cut of global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. CO<sub>2</sub> leakage from the subsurface may impair the performance of CGUS projects, and the CO<sub>2</sub> leakage through wellbores is the most common leakage pathway. This paper proposes a workflow for wellbore CO<sub>2</sub> leakage risk management, and the workflow consists of the following steps: i) leakage risk identification; ii) leakage risk evaluation; iii) leakage risk monitoring; iv) leakage handling. Representative approaches in each step of the workflow are systematically reviewed. Key challenges of wellbore CO<sub>2</sub> leakage risk management include: lack of effective detection and evaluation approaches to tackle the CO<sub>2</sub> leakage risk induced by cement failure; lack of low-cost acid resistance alloys and CO<sub>2</sub>-resistant cement; lack of automated monitoring systems that could enable automated shutdowns of the wellbore whenever certain warning criteria are met.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100471,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reviews","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772970223000366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

CO2 geological utilization and storage (CGUS) is an important technology to achieve a deep cut of global CO2 emissions. CO2 leakage from the subsurface may impair the performance of CGUS projects, and the CO2 leakage through wellbores is the most common leakage pathway. This paper proposes a workflow for wellbore CO2 leakage risk management, and the workflow consists of the following steps: i) leakage risk identification; ii) leakage risk evaluation; iii) leakage risk monitoring; iv) leakage handling. Representative approaches in each step of the workflow are systematically reviewed. Key challenges of wellbore CO2 leakage risk management include: lack of effective detection and evaluation approaches to tackle the CO2 leakage risk induced by cement failure; lack of low-cost acid resistance alloys and CO2-resistant cement; lack of automated monitoring systems that could enable automated shutdowns of the wellbore whenever certain warning criteria are met.

二氧化碳地质利用与封存中的井筒泄漏风险管理综述
二氧化碳地质利用与封存(CGUS)是实现全球二氧化碳排放深度削减的重要技术。地下CO2泄漏可能会损害CGUS项目的性能,而通过井筒的CO2泄漏是最常见的泄漏途径。本文提出了井筒CO2泄漏风险管理的工作流程,该工作流程包括以下步骤:i)泄漏风险识别;ii)泄漏风险评估;iii)泄漏风险监测;iv)泄漏处理。系统地审查了工作流程的每个步骤中的代表性方法。井筒二氧化碳泄漏风险管理的主要挑战包括:缺乏有效的检测和评估方法来应对水泥失效引起的二氧化碳泄漏风险;缺乏低成本的耐酸合金和耐CO2水泥;缺乏能够在满足某些警告标准时自动关闭井筒的自动监测系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信