Health risks of pest control and disinfection workers after the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea

IF 6.9 Q1 Environmental Science
Journal of environmental sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jes.2023.05.004
Yun-Hee Choi , Da-An Huh , Lita Kim , Sang ji Lee , Kyong Whan Moon
{"title":"Health risks of pest control and disinfection workers after the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea","authors":"Yun-Hee Choi ,&nbsp;Da-An Huh ,&nbsp;Lita Kim ,&nbsp;Sang ji Lee ,&nbsp;Kyong Whan Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.jes.2023.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The exposure patterns of pest control and disinfection workers have changed after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, but the health risks of chemical exposure have not been assessed. We identified these workers' chemical exposure patterns and risks before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. We used data conducted between 2018 (pre-pandemic) and 2021 (post-pandemic) from three-year cross-sectional surveys on pest control and disinfection workers. Inhalation and dermal exposure concentrations were estimated using equations based on a biocidal product risk assessment model from the Korean National Institute of Environmental Research. The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks of chemicals were calculated using the United States Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment model. We found that the annual work frequency (50<sup>th</sup> percentile) of foggers using disinfectants increased the most among all the work types, from 140 uses/year to 176 uses/year after the COVID-19 outbreak. Moreover, all chemicals' non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks increased regardless of exposure routes. In the worst scenario (95<sup>th</sup> percentile), the margin of exposure for citric acid, benzethonium chloride, benzyl-C12-16-alkyldimethyl chlorides, and sodium chlorite of inhalation exposure, and isopropyl alcohol and benzyl-C12-16-alkyldimethyl chlorides of dermal exposure were acceptable (&gt;100) before the COVID-19 outbreak but became unacceptable (&lt;100) after the COVID-19 outbreak. Carcinogenic risks of dichlorvos from inhalation and dermal exposure were above acceptable levels (&gt;10<sup>−6</sup>) before and after the COVID-19 outbreak but comparatively high after the COVID-19 outbreak. Additionally, significantly more workers experienced health symptoms after the COVID-19 outbreak (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05), with the most common being muscle lethargy (31%), skin/face stinging (28.7%), and breath shortness/neck pain (24.1%).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental sciences","volume":"139 ","pages":"Pages 350-363"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074223002048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The exposure patterns of pest control and disinfection workers have changed after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, but the health risks of chemical exposure have not been assessed. We identified these workers' chemical exposure patterns and risks before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. We used data conducted between 2018 (pre-pandemic) and 2021 (post-pandemic) from three-year cross-sectional surveys on pest control and disinfection workers. Inhalation and dermal exposure concentrations were estimated using equations based on a biocidal product risk assessment model from the Korean National Institute of Environmental Research. The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks of chemicals were calculated using the United States Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment model. We found that the annual work frequency (50th percentile) of foggers using disinfectants increased the most among all the work types, from 140 uses/year to 176 uses/year after the COVID-19 outbreak. Moreover, all chemicals' non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks increased regardless of exposure routes. In the worst scenario (95th percentile), the margin of exposure for citric acid, benzethonium chloride, benzyl-C12-16-alkyldimethyl chlorides, and sodium chlorite of inhalation exposure, and isopropyl alcohol and benzyl-C12-16-alkyldimethyl chlorides of dermal exposure were acceptable (>100) before the COVID-19 outbreak but became unacceptable (<100) after the COVID-19 outbreak. Carcinogenic risks of dichlorvos from inhalation and dermal exposure were above acceptable levels (>10−6) before and after the COVID-19 outbreak but comparatively high after the COVID-19 outbreak. Additionally, significantly more workers experienced health symptoms after the COVID-19 outbreak (p<0.05), with the most common being muscle lethargy (31%), skin/face stinging (28.7%), and breath shortness/neck pain (24.1%).

Abstract Image

新型冠状病毒病虫害防治和消毒工作人员的健康风险
2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)爆发后,害虫防治和消毒工作人员的接触模式发生了变化,但尚未评估化学品接触的健康风险。我们确定了这些工人在新冠肺炎爆发前后的化学品暴露模式和风险。我们使用了2018年(疫情前)至2021年(疫情后)期间对害虫防治和消毒工作者进行的为期三年的横断面调查的数据。使用基于韩国国立环境研究所生物杀灭剂产品风险评估模型的方程来估计吸入和皮肤暴露浓度。化学品的非致癌和致癌风险是使用美国环境保护局风险评估模型计算的。我们发现,在所有工作类型中,使用消毒剂的烟雾机的年度工作频率(第50百分位)增加最多,从新冠肺炎爆发后的140次/年增加到176次/年。此外,无论接触途径如何,所有化学品的非致癌和致癌风险都会增加。在最坏的情况下(第95百分位),吸入暴露的柠檬酸、苯甲氯铵、苄基C12-16烷基二甲基氯化物和亚氯酸钠以及皮肤暴露的异丙醇和苄基C12-16烷二甲基氯化物的暴露幅度在新冠肺炎爆发前是可接受的(>;100),但在新冠肺炎爆发后变得不可接受(<;100)。在新冠肺炎爆发前后,吸入和皮肤暴露的敌敌敌畏致癌风险高于可接受水平(>;10−6),但在新冠肺炎爆发后相对较高。此外,新冠肺炎爆发后,出现健康症状的工人明显增多(p<0.05),最常见的是肌肉无精打采(31%)、皮肤/面部刺痛(28.7%)和呼吸急促/颈部疼痛(24.1%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental sciences
Journal of environmental sciences Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Sciences is an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1989. It is sponsored by the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and it is jointly published by Elsevier and Science Press. It aims to foster interdisciplinary communication and promote understanding of significant environmental issues. The journal seeks to publish significant and novel research on the fate and behaviour of emerging contaminants, human impact on the environment, human exposure to environmental contaminants and their health effects, and environmental remediation and management. Original research articles, critical reviews, highlights, and perspectives of high quality are published both in print and online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书