Developing a specialty transition clinic: Inaugural clinical and financial operations

Wendy N. Gray , Erin Benekos , Courtney Malave , Lauren Partain , Parasto Dorriz , Michael Weiss
{"title":"Developing a specialty transition clinic: Inaugural clinical and financial operations","authors":"Wendy N. Gray ,&nbsp;Erin Benekos ,&nbsp;Courtney Malave ,&nbsp;Lauren Partain ,&nbsp;Parasto Dorriz ,&nbsp;Michael Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.hctj.2023.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Few examples of hospital-wide transition programs have been presented in the literature and to date, we have no data on the clinical and financial operations of such services.</p></div><div><h3>Design and methods</h3><p>A transition clinic, guided by Got Transition’s Six Core Elements, was created for youth with moderate-to-high medical and psychosocial complexity (per Bob’s Levels of Social Support scale). The clinic visit and transition readiness assessment (UNC TR<sub>x</sub>ANSITION Index) were billed fee-for-service or under a bundled payment managed care model. We present data on patient characteristics, clinic operations, finances, and patient/parent satisfaction (online survey) in the clinic’s first year of operation (March 2021-February 2022).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In Year 1, the clinic completed 115 appointments (113 unique patients). Most patients were older adolescents/young adults (M = 19.7 ± 1.8 years) and nearly half were Latinx. Patients presented with several complex medical needs including coordination of care across multiple subspecialties, high health care utilization, decision-making determinations, behavioral and mental health concerns, and resource needs. Implementation of the Six Core elements was high (range 99.1%−100%). The average billed per patient was $498 (in 2021–2022 USD). Considering paid and unpaid office visits, we collected an average of 31.6 cents on the dollar. Almost 80% of office visit claims and 21.9–33.3% of transition readiness assessments were paid by insurers. Patient/parent satisfaction was high, with over 90% of families reporting that they learned something, knew one thing they could do to improve transition readiness, and were able to get their questions asked and answered.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Transition clinics may never be fully self-sustainable given low collection rates and inability to capture extra charge codes related to chronic care management and transitional care. However, our collection rate was on-par with the collection rate for our hospital’s subspecialty clinics and we show it is possible to receive some funding from insurers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100602,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Transitions","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949923223000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Few examples of hospital-wide transition programs have been presented in the literature and to date, we have no data on the clinical and financial operations of such services.

Design and methods

A transition clinic, guided by Got Transition’s Six Core Elements, was created for youth with moderate-to-high medical and psychosocial complexity (per Bob’s Levels of Social Support scale). The clinic visit and transition readiness assessment (UNC TRxANSITION Index) were billed fee-for-service or under a bundled payment managed care model. We present data on patient characteristics, clinic operations, finances, and patient/parent satisfaction (online survey) in the clinic’s first year of operation (March 2021-February 2022).

Results

In Year 1, the clinic completed 115 appointments (113 unique patients). Most patients were older adolescents/young adults (M = 19.7 ± 1.8 years) and nearly half were Latinx. Patients presented with several complex medical needs including coordination of care across multiple subspecialties, high health care utilization, decision-making determinations, behavioral and mental health concerns, and resource needs. Implementation of the Six Core elements was high (range 99.1%−100%). The average billed per patient was $498 (in 2021–2022 USD). Considering paid and unpaid office visits, we collected an average of 31.6 cents on the dollar. Almost 80% of office visit claims and 21.9–33.3% of transition readiness assessments were paid by insurers. Patient/parent satisfaction was high, with over 90% of families reporting that they learned something, knew one thing they could do to improve transition readiness, and were able to get their questions asked and answered.

Conclusions

Transition clinics may never be fully self-sustainable given low collection rates and inability to capture extra charge codes related to chronic care management and transitional care. However, our collection rate was on-par with the collection rate for our hospital’s subspecialty clinics and we show it is possible to receive some funding from insurers.

发展专业过渡诊所:开业临床和财务运作
目的文献中很少有医院范围内过渡计划的例子,到目前为止,我们还没有关于此类服务的临床和财务运作的数据。设计和方法在Got transition的六个核心要素的指导下,为具有中度至高度医疗和心理社会复杂性的年轻人创建了一个过渡诊所(根据Bob的社会支持水平量表)。诊所就诊和过渡准备评估(UNC TRxANSITION指数)是按服务收费或根据捆绑支付管理的护理模式计费的。我们提供了该诊所运营第一年(2021年3月至2022年2月)的患者特征、诊所运营、财务和患者/家长满意度(在线调查)数据。结果在第一年,该诊所完成了115次预约(113名独特患者)。大多数患者是年龄较大的青少年/年轻人(M=19.7±1.8岁),近一半是拉丁裔。患者有多种复杂的医疗需求,包括跨多个子专业的护理协调、高医疗利用率、决策、行为和心理健康问题以及资源需求。六个核心要素的实施率很高(范围为99.1%-100%)。每位患者的平均账单为498美元(2021-2022美元)。考虑到带薪和无薪的办公室访问,我们平均收取了31.6美分。近80%的办公室访问索赔和21.9-33.3%的过渡准备评估由保险公司支付。患者/家长的满意度很高,超过90%的家庭报告说,他们学到了一些东西,知道自己可以做些什么来提高过渡准备,并且能够询问和回答他们的问题。结论鉴于收集率低,且无法获取与慢性病护理管理和过渡期护理相关的额外收费代码,过渡期诊所可能永远无法完全自我维持。然而,我们的收款率与我们医院的亚专科诊所的收款率持平,我们表明有可能从保险公司获得一些资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信