Fei Peng , Guo Chen , Shuwen Pei , Sam Lin , Xing Gao
{"title":"Initial Upper Paleolithic in North China: New data from Shuidonggou locality 9","authors":"Fei Peng , Guo Chen , Shuwen Pei , Sam Lin , Xing Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The timing and dispersal of modern humans into Northeast Asia has been a subject of hot debate, fueled by increasing discoveries of previously unknown human species in the region, including the so-called Denisovans. In this debate, archaeological assemblages identified as Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) play a key role as they are often seen as possible markers for the dispersal of modern human culture across Eurasia. In North China, the presence of IUP blade assemblages is well-established at the Shuidonggou site complex (SDG), particularly at </span>SDG locality 1 (SDG1). In this study, we present a preliminary analysis of another blade-dominated lithic assemblage from SDG locality 9 (SDG9). Applying a combination of typological and technological approaches, we demonstrate that, similar to SDG1, the lithic reduction patterns represented at SDG9 are centered on the use of the recurrent Levallois method to produce blades and elongated flakes, a technological feature that is characteristic of the IUP technology. However, the SDG9 assemblage also exhibits some differences to SDG1, including the dominant use of siliceous limestone as raw material, the absence of prismatic and sub-prismatic cores, and limited retouched pieces. These disparities indicate possible regional variation and diversities in IUP assemblages at SDG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100484"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226723000569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The timing and dispersal of modern humans into Northeast Asia has been a subject of hot debate, fueled by increasing discoveries of previously unknown human species in the region, including the so-called Denisovans. In this debate, archaeological assemblages identified as Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) play a key role as they are often seen as possible markers for the dispersal of modern human culture across Eurasia. In North China, the presence of IUP blade assemblages is well-established at the Shuidonggou site complex (SDG), particularly at SDG locality 1 (SDG1). In this study, we present a preliminary analysis of another blade-dominated lithic assemblage from SDG locality 9 (SDG9). Applying a combination of typological and technological approaches, we demonstrate that, similar to SDG1, the lithic reduction patterns represented at SDG9 are centered on the use of the recurrent Levallois method to produce blades and elongated flakes, a technological feature that is characteristic of the IUP technology. However, the SDG9 assemblage also exhibits some differences to SDG1, including the dominant use of siliceous limestone as raw material, the absence of prismatic and sub-prismatic cores, and limited retouched pieces. These disparities indicate possible regional variation and diversities in IUP assemblages at SDG.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.