Effects of Sage-Grouse Habitat Restoration Efforts on Pollination Networks in an Arid Ecosystem

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Khum Bahadur Thapa-Magar , Thomas Seth Davis , Sara M. Galbraith , Madeline Grant-Hoffman
{"title":"Effects of Sage-Grouse Habitat Restoration Efforts on Pollination Networks in an Arid Ecosystem","authors":"Khum Bahadur Thapa-Magar ,&nbsp;Thomas Seth Davis ,&nbsp;Sara M. Galbraith ,&nbsp;Madeline Grant-Hoffman","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2023.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>On publicly managed lands of western North America, canopy removal is practiced as a habitat improvement for sage grouse </span><em>(Centrocercus</em> species<em>),</em> often with the goal of converting dominant vegetation cover from pinyon pine <em>(Pinus edulis)</em> and juniper (<em>Juniperus</em> spp.) to sagebrush (<span><em>Artemisia</em></span><span><span> spp.). However, it remains unclear whether habitat conversion practices impact other species of conservation concern, especially </span>pollinators<span>, which are sensitive to changes in vegetation cover. Here we test how bee-flower assemblages differ between pinyon-juniper and sagebrush habitats and whether removal of canopy by mastication affects bee-flower networks.</span></span></p><p><span>Three important findings emerged: 1) linkage density (a measure of diversity) of bee-flower interactions was 33% higher in sagebrush habitats; however, mastication treatments were associated with reduced network specialization and there was evidence of interannual variation in network indices; 2) the most-visited floral taxa in pinyon-juniper sites were woody plants </span><span><em>(Amelanchier, </em><em>Opuntia</em><em>, Prunus)</em></span><span> but, in sagebrush sites forbs </span><em>(Heterotheca, Eriogonum)</em> were more frequently visited; however, weedy taxa including <span><em>Cirsium</em></span> and <span><em>Melilotus</em></span> were highly utilized in both habitats; and 3) site physiography affected bee assemblages; incident radiation (heat load index, HLI) had larger effects than relative site position in conservation areas, with higher bee abundance and richness at cool sites with low canopy cover.</p><p>We conclude that conversion of sites from pinyon-juniper to sagebrush is not likely to negatively impact bee-flower interactions in comparison with nontreated sagebrush habitats. Several native forbs and woody species highly visited by bees can be targeted for site restoration efforts, but eradication of “weedy” taxa (<em>Cirsium</em> and <em>Melilotus</em>) may reduce habitat availability. Managers should also consider site physiography when prioritizing treatment landscapes, with an emphasis on prioritizing conservation in habitats with low HLI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742423000982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On publicly managed lands of western North America, canopy removal is practiced as a habitat improvement for sage grouse (Centrocercus species), often with the goal of converting dominant vegetation cover from pinyon pine (Pinus edulis) and juniper (Juniperus spp.) to sagebrush (Artemisia spp.). However, it remains unclear whether habitat conversion practices impact other species of conservation concern, especially pollinators, which are sensitive to changes in vegetation cover. Here we test how bee-flower assemblages differ between pinyon-juniper and sagebrush habitats and whether removal of canopy by mastication affects bee-flower networks.

Three important findings emerged: 1) linkage density (a measure of diversity) of bee-flower interactions was 33% higher in sagebrush habitats; however, mastication treatments were associated with reduced network specialization and there was evidence of interannual variation in network indices; 2) the most-visited floral taxa in pinyon-juniper sites were woody plants (Amelanchier, Opuntia, Prunus) but, in sagebrush sites forbs (Heterotheca, Eriogonum) were more frequently visited; however, weedy taxa including Cirsium and Melilotus were highly utilized in both habitats; and 3) site physiography affected bee assemblages; incident radiation (heat load index, HLI) had larger effects than relative site position in conservation areas, with higher bee abundance and richness at cool sites with low canopy cover.

We conclude that conversion of sites from pinyon-juniper to sagebrush is not likely to negatively impact bee-flower interactions in comparison with nontreated sagebrush habitats. Several native forbs and woody species highly visited by bees can be targeted for site restoration efforts, but eradication of “weedy” taxa (Cirsium and Melilotus) may reduce habitat availability. Managers should also consider site physiography when prioritizing treatment landscapes, with an emphasis on prioritizing conservation in habitats with low HLI.

干旱生态系统艾草松鸡生境恢复对传粉网络的影响
在北美洲西部的公共管理土地上,树冠移除被视为鼠尾草松鸡(Centrocercus物种)的栖息地改善,其目的通常是将主要植被覆盖从松(Pinus edulis)和杜松(Juniperus spp.)转化为山艾树(Artemisia spp.)。然而,目前尚不清楚栖息地转换做法是否会影响其他受保护物种,尤其是对植被覆盖变化敏感的传粉昆虫。在这里,我们测试了松柏和山艾树栖息地的蜜蜂花朵组合如何不同,以及通过咀嚼去除树冠是否会影响蜜蜂的花朵网络。出现了三个重要的发现:1)在山艾树栖息地,蜂花相互作用的连锁密度(一种多样性的衡量标准)高出33%;然而,咀嚼处理与网络专业化程度降低有关,并且有证据表明网络指数存在年际变化;2) 松属植物中访问次数最多的是木本植物(Amelanchier、Opuntia、Prunus),但在山艾树属植物中,forbs(Heterotheca、Eriogonum)访问次数更频繁;然而,包括Cirsium和Melilotus在内的杂草类群在这两个栖息地都得到了高度利用;(3)受场地地貌影响的蜜蜂群落;在保护区,入射辐射(热负荷指数,HLI)比相对位置的影响更大,在低冠层覆盖的凉爽地点,蜜蜂的丰度和丰富度更高。我们得出的结论是,与未经处理的山艾树栖息地相比,从松柏到山艾树的地点转换不太可能对蜜蜂与花朵的相互作用产生负面影响。蜜蜂经常造访的几种本地禁种植物和木本物种可以作为现场恢复工作的目标,但根除“杂草”分类群(Cirsium和Melilotus)可能会减少栖息地的可用性。管理者在优先考虑处理景观时,还应考虑场地地貌,重点是优先保护HLI低的栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信