Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions (DNACPR) – Policy approaches in Wales

Mark Taubert, Ben Rose, Miriam Rigby
{"title":"Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions (DNACPR) – Policy approaches in Wales","authors":"Mark Taubert,&nbsp;Ben Rose,&nbsp;Miriam Rigby","doi":"10.1016/j.intcar.2023.100149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was first described in 1960, when Kouwenhoven and colleagues described a novel technique of ‘closed chest cardiac massage’. CPR is an emergency medical intervention undertaken in an attempt to restore breathing and circulation following a respiratory or cardio-respiratory arrest. The intervention includes the administration of external chest compressions, artificial ventilation<span>, and consecutive electric shocks applied to the bare chest (known as defibrillation) and the rapid administration of medicines intravenously or intra-osseously. But there are clear differences in who will and will not respond to these ferocious interventions in cardiac arrest situations. In some instances, clinicians may be as certain as they can be that future attempts at CPR will not work. In those situations, a Do Not Attempt CPR form may be filled out, after a consultation with the patient. Here, the authors review current policies, guidelines and resources, discuss how the prospect of a natural, anticipated and accepted death in the near future can be a trigger to advance care planning, and outline resources that can help improve communication in an area rife with misconceptions and misunderstanding.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100283,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Integrated Care","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266686962300012X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was first described in 1960, when Kouwenhoven and colleagues described a novel technique of ‘closed chest cardiac massage’. CPR is an emergency medical intervention undertaken in an attempt to restore breathing and circulation following a respiratory or cardio-respiratory arrest. The intervention includes the administration of external chest compressions, artificial ventilation, and consecutive electric shocks applied to the bare chest (known as defibrillation) and the rapid administration of medicines intravenously or intra-osseously. But there are clear differences in who will and will not respond to these ferocious interventions in cardiac arrest situations. In some instances, clinicians may be as certain as they can be that future attempts at CPR will not work. In those situations, a Do Not Attempt CPR form may be filled out, after a consultation with the patient. Here, the authors review current policies, guidelines and resources, discuss how the prospect of a natural, anticipated and accepted death in the near future can be a trigger to advance care planning, and outline resources that can help improve communication in an area rife with misconceptions and misunderstanding.

不要尝试心肺复苏决定(dacpr) -威尔士的政策方法
心肺复苏术(CPR)于1960年首次被描述,当时Kouwenhoven和他的同事描述了一种新的“闭胸心脏按摩”技术。心肺复苏术是一种紧急医疗干预措施,旨在在呼吸或心肺骤停后恢复呼吸和循环。干预措施包括胸外按压、人工通气、裸胸连续电击(称为除颤)以及静脉内或骨内快速给药。但在心脏骤停情况下,谁会和谁不会对这些凶猛的干预措施做出反应,这一点存在明显差异。在某些情况下,临床医生可能会尽可能确信未来的心肺复苏尝试不会奏效。在这种情况下,在咨询患者后,可以填写“请勿尝试心肺复苏”表格。在这里,作者回顾了当前的政策、指导方针和资源,讨论了在不久的将来自然、预期和可接受的死亡前景如何成为提前护理计划的触发因素,并概述了有助于改善误解和误解地区沟通的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信