Implementation of a structured revision program and the impact on final-year undergraduate nursing students’ preparedness for clinical placement: Mixed methods study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Susan Irvine , Yu Hua Gong , Carmel Mcleod , Yangama Jokwiro , Beverley Copnell
{"title":"Implementation of a structured revision program and the impact on final-year undergraduate nursing students’ preparedness for clinical placement: Mixed methods study","authors":"Susan Irvine ,&nbsp;Yu Hua Gong ,&nbsp;Carmel Mcleod ,&nbsp;Yangama Jokwiro ,&nbsp;Beverley Copnell","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>The effects of a revision program on undergraduate nursing students’ preparedness for their final clinical placement leading to their graduate year are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore students’ perceptions of confidence, anxiety, self-doubt, and preparedness for a high-acuity clinical placement following a three-day structured revision program.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This was a mixed methods study conducted in the final year of the undergraduate nursing degree. Data were collected by survey using a self-developed 10-item instrument with three components of confidence, inhibitors (self-doubt/anxiety), and preparedness (n = 75) and by semi-structured individual interviews and focus group (7 students in total). Independent sample t-tests were used to compare data between components’ scores and demographic characteristics. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Students who attended the revision program had significantly higher scores for confidence, inhibitors, and preparation. Higher scores in one or more components were associated with enrolment in the Bachelor of Nursing (BN) versus the Bachelor of Nursing/Bachelor of Midwifery, enrolment in the accelerated pathway of the BN, older age, and previous healthcare experience. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data: anticipatory concerns, confidence, preparedness, and striving to belong.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings have potential implications for adverse learning outcomes and poor student performance because of negative behaviours, lack of preparedness, and belongingness. There is a need to structure curricula, implement instructional support for students with anxiety and self-doubt, and faculty to align pedagogy to best educational practices with student attendance at structured revision sessions before each clinical placement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 708-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

The effects of a revision program on undergraduate nursing students’ preparedness for their final clinical placement leading to their graduate year are unknown.

Aim

To explore students’ perceptions of confidence, anxiety, self-doubt, and preparedness for a high-acuity clinical placement following a three-day structured revision program.

Method

This was a mixed methods study conducted in the final year of the undergraduate nursing degree. Data were collected by survey using a self-developed 10-item instrument with three components of confidence, inhibitors (self-doubt/anxiety), and preparedness (n = 75) and by semi-structured individual interviews and focus group (7 students in total). Independent sample t-tests were used to compare data between components’ scores and demographic characteristics. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Students who attended the revision program had significantly higher scores for confidence, inhibitors, and preparation. Higher scores in one or more components were associated with enrolment in the Bachelor of Nursing (BN) versus the Bachelor of Nursing/Bachelor of Midwifery, enrolment in the accelerated pathway of the BN, older age, and previous healthcare experience. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data: anticipatory concerns, confidence, preparedness, and striving to belong.

Conclusion

The findings have potential implications for adverse learning outcomes and poor student performance because of negative behaviours, lack of preparedness, and belongingness. There is a need to structure curricula, implement instructional support for students with anxiety and self-doubt, and faculty to align pedagogy to best educational practices with student attendance at structured revision sessions before each clinical placement.

实施结构化复习课程及其对护理本科生最后一年临床实习准备的影响:混合方法研究
问题修订计划对护理本科生在研究生毕业前最后一次临床实习的准备情况的影响尚不清楚。目的探讨学生在为期三天的结构化复习计划后对自信、焦虑、自我怀疑的看法,以及对高视力临床实习的准备情况。方法本研究采用混合方法,于护理学本科四年级进行。通过使用自行开发的10项工具进行调查,包括信心、抑制因素(自我怀疑/焦虑)和准备(n=75)三个组成部分,并通过半结构化的个人访谈和焦点小组(共7名学生)收集数据。独立样本t检验用于比较成分得分和人口统计学特征之间的数据。访谈数据采用专题分析法进行分析。结果参加复习项目的学生在信心、抑制剂和准备方面得分显著较高。一个或多个组成部分的高分与护理学士(BN)与护理学士/助产学士的入学率、护理学士加速课程的入学率以及年龄较大和既往医疗经验有关。从定性数据中得出四个主题:预期关注、信心、准备和努力归属。结论研究结果可能会对消极行为、缺乏准备和归属感导致的不良学习结果和学生成绩不佳产生影响。有必要构建课程,为焦虑和自我怀疑的学生提供教学支持,并让教师将教学法与最佳教育实践相结合,让学生在每次临床实习前参加结构化的复习课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信