Coupled experimental assessment and machine learning prediction of mechanical integrity of MICP and cement paste as underground plugging materials

Oladoyin Kolawole , Rayan H. Assaad , Matthew P. Adams , Mary C. Ngoma , Alexander Anya , Ghiwa Assaf
{"title":"Coupled experimental assessment and machine learning prediction of mechanical integrity of MICP and cement paste as underground plugging materials","authors":"Oladoyin Kolawole ,&nbsp;Rayan H. Assaad ,&nbsp;Matthew P. Adams ,&nbsp;Mary C. Ngoma ,&nbsp;Alexander Anya ,&nbsp;Ghiwa Assaf","doi":"10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compromised integrity of cementitious materials can lead to potential geo-hazards such as detrimental fluid flow to the wellbore (borehole), potential leakage of underground stored fluids, contamination of water aquifers, and other issues that could impact environmental sustainability during underground construction operations. The mechanical integrity of wellbore cementitious materials is critical to prevent wellbore failure and leakages, and thus, it is imperative to understand and predict the integrity of oilwell cement (OWC) and microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) to maintain wellbore integrity and ensure zonal isolation at depth. Here, we investigated the mechanical integrity of two cementitious materials (MICP and OWC), and assessed their potential for plugging leakages around the wellbore. Further, we applied Machine Learning (ML) models to upscale and predict near-wellbore mechanical integrity at macro-scale by adopting two ML algorithms, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF), using 100 datasets (containing 100 observations). Fractured portions of rock specimens were treated with MICP and OWC, respectively, and their resultant mechanical integrity (unconfined compressive strength, <em>UCS</em>; fracture toughness, <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub>) were evaluated using experimental mechanical tests and ML models. The experimental results showed that although OWC (average <em>UCS</em> = 97 MPa, <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 4.3 MPa·√m) has higher mechanical integrity over MICP (average <em>UCS</em> = 86 MPa, <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 3.6 MPa·√m), the MICP showed an edge over OWC in sealing microfractures and micro-leakage pathways. Also, the OWC can provide a greater near-wellbore seal than MICP for casing-cement or cement-formation delamination with relatively greater mechanical integrity. The results show that the degree of correlation between the mechanical integrity obtained from lab tests and the ML predictions is high. The best ML algorithm to predict the macro-scale mechanical integrity of a MICP-cemented specimen is the RF model (R<sup>2</sup> for <em>UCS</em> = 0.9738 and <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.9988; MAE for <em>UCS</em> = 1.04 MPa and <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.02 MPa·√m). Similarly, for OWC-cemented specimen, the best ML algorithm to predict their macro-scale mechanical integrity is the RF model (R<sup>2</sup> for <em>UCS</em> = 0.9984 and <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.9996; MAE for <em>UCS</em> = 0.5 MPa and <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.01 MPa·√m). This study provides insights into the potential of MICP and OWC as near-wellbore cementitious materials and the applicability of ML model for evaluating and predicting the mechanical integrity of cementitious materials used in near-wellbore to achieve efficient geo-hazard mitigation and environmental protection in engineering and underground operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100175,"journal":{"name":"Biogeotechnics","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949929123000207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Compromised integrity of cementitious materials can lead to potential geo-hazards such as detrimental fluid flow to the wellbore (borehole), potential leakage of underground stored fluids, contamination of water aquifers, and other issues that could impact environmental sustainability during underground construction operations. The mechanical integrity of wellbore cementitious materials is critical to prevent wellbore failure and leakages, and thus, it is imperative to understand and predict the integrity of oilwell cement (OWC) and microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) to maintain wellbore integrity and ensure zonal isolation at depth. Here, we investigated the mechanical integrity of two cementitious materials (MICP and OWC), and assessed their potential for plugging leakages around the wellbore. Further, we applied Machine Learning (ML) models to upscale and predict near-wellbore mechanical integrity at macro-scale by adopting two ML algorithms, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF), using 100 datasets (containing 100 observations). Fractured portions of rock specimens were treated with MICP and OWC, respectively, and their resultant mechanical integrity (unconfined compressive strength, UCS; fracture toughness, Ks) were evaluated using experimental mechanical tests and ML models. The experimental results showed that although OWC (average UCS = 97 MPa, Ks = 4.3 MPa·√m) has higher mechanical integrity over MICP (average UCS = 86 MPa, Ks = 3.6 MPa·√m), the MICP showed an edge over OWC in sealing microfractures and micro-leakage pathways. Also, the OWC can provide a greater near-wellbore seal than MICP for casing-cement or cement-formation delamination with relatively greater mechanical integrity. The results show that the degree of correlation between the mechanical integrity obtained from lab tests and the ML predictions is high. The best ML algorithm to predict the macro-scale mechanical integrity of a MICP-cemented specimen is the RF model (R2 for UCS = 0.9738 and Ks = 0.9988; MAE for UCS = 1.04 MPa and Ks = 0.02 MPa·√m). Similarly, for OWC-cemented specimen, the best ML algorithm to predict their macro-scale mechanical integrity is the RF model (R2 for UCS = 0.9984 and Ks = 0.9996; MAE for UCS = 0.5 MPa and Ks = 0.01 MPa·√m). This study provides insights into the potential of MICP and OWC as near-wellbore cementitious materials and the applicability of ML model for evaluating and predicting the mechanical integrity of cementitious materials used in near-wellbore to achieve efficient geo-hazard mitigation and environmental protection in engineering and underground operations.

地下封堵材料MICP与水泥浆力学完整性的耦合实验评价与机器学习预测
胶结材料的完整性受损可能导致潜在的地质灾害,如有害流体流到井筒(钻孔)、地下储存流体的潜在泄漏、含水层的污染,以及其他可能影响地下施工作业期间环境可持续性的问题。井筒胶结材料的机械完整性对于防止井筒失效和泄漏至关重要,因此,必须了解和预测油井水泥(OWC)和微生物诱导的方解石沉淀(MICP)的完整性,以保持井筒完整性并确保深度的分层隔离。在这里,我们研究了两种胶结材料(MICP和OWC)的机械完整性,并评估了它们堵塞井筒周围泄漏的潜力。此外,我们应用机器学习(ML)模型,通过采用人工神经网络(ANN)和随机森林(RF)两种ML算法,使用100个数据集(包含100个观测值),在宏观尺度上提升和预测近井机械完整性。分别用MICP和OWC处理岩石试样的断裂部分,并使用实验力学试验和ML模型评估其最终的机械完整性(无侧限抗压强度,UCS;断裂韧性,Ks)。实验结果表明,尽管OWC(平均UCS=97MPa,Ks=4.3MPa·√m)比MICP(平均UCS=86MPa,Ks=3.6MPa·√米)具有更高的机械完整性,但MICP在密封微裂缝和微泄漏路径方面显示出优于OWC的优势。此外,对于具有相对更大机械完整性的套管水泥或水泥地层分层,OWC可以提供比MICP更大的近井筒密封。结果表明,从实验室测试中获得的机械完整性与ML预测之间的相关性很高。预测MICP胶结试样宏观力学完整性的最佳ML算法是RF模型(UCS的R2=0.9738,Ks=0.9988;UCS的MAE=1.04 MPa,Ks=0.02 MPa·√m)。同样,对于OWC胶结试样,预测其宏观力学完整性的最佳ML算法是RF模型(UCS的R2=0.9984,Ks=0.9996;UCS的MAE=0.5 MPa,Ks=0.01 MPa·√m)。本研究深入了解了MICP和OWC作为近井胶结材料的潜力,以及ML模型在评估和预测胶结材料力学完整性方面的适用性用于近井筒,在工程和地下作业中实现有效的地质灾害缓解和环境保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信