A correction scheme for calcium carbonate clumped isotope (Δ47) thermometric equation depending on sample preparation technique

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Sanchita Banerjee , Prosenjit Ghosh
{"title":"A correction scheme for calcium carbonate clumped isotope (Δ47) thermometric equation depending on sample preparation technique","authors":"Sanchita Banerjee ,&nbsp;Prosenjit Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The CO<sub>2</sub> preparatory methods implemented during carbonate-clumped isotope analysis for the acid digestion of carbonate with the goal of high sample throughput yielded multiple empirical relationships for the thermometry. These methods varied significantly from its original practice of carbonate reaction at 25 °C using sealed vessel method to automated quick performance acid drip or common acid bath method at 70 °C or 90 °C temperatures, respectively; these approaches differed noticeably. Technical development replacing primitive reaction protocols, introduced different reaction conditions, causing significant differences in the chemical reaction procedure and CO<sub>2</sub> trapping, which caused variation in the values of slope and intercept for the linear regression equations governing carbonate-clumped isotope(Δ<sub>47</sub>) distribution with carbonate growth temperatures. These studies include the Δ<sub>47</sub> measurement and analysis of either laboratory-grown or natural carbonates with precise knowledge of their precipitation/depositional temperatures. However, the discrepancies in the existing universal calibration schemes remained poorly understood despite adopting an identical data correction protocol. This is explained here by the reaction kinetics and CO<sub>2</sub> collection methodologies adopted during experimentation. The present study investigated the slope and intercept values of the published carbonate clumped isotope thermometry equations expressed in the accepted Absolute Reference Frame (ARF in CDES) at 25 °C after accounting for the acid correction factor. We observe a systematic shift in the mean slope and intercept values of 0.0154(±0.007) and 0.153(±0.0686) ‰ for 70 °C reaction experiments and offset of 0.0181(±0.008) and 0.197(±0.079) ‰ for the experiments conducted at 90 °C by using the acid drip and/or Common Acid bath method, respectively from the slope and intercept values of the calibration equations proposed using sealed vessel method at 25 °C reaction temperature. The mean values for slope and intercept are compared using ANOVA and paired f-test. These correction factors for slopes and intercepts will allow the transformation of clumped isotope values at different temperatures into ARF scale at 25 °C and enable accurate deduction of temperature for carbonate samples. Correction factors proposed here account for variations in the sample preparation techniques arising due to different reaction temperatures, mechanisms and vapor pressure in the chamber for isotopic exchange reaction to happen for smaller or prolonged time intervals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 105809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292723002548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CO2 preparatory methods implemented during carbonate-clumped isotope analysis for the acid digestion of carbonate with the goal of high sample throughput yielded multiple empirical relationships for the thermometry. These methods varied significantly from its original practice of carbonate reaction at 25 °C using sealed vessel method to automated quick performance acid drip or common acid bath method at 70 °C or 90 °C temperatures, respectively; these approaches differed noticeably. Technical development replacing primitive reaction protocols, introduced different reaction conditions, causing significant differences in the chemical reaction procedure and CO2 trapping, which caused variation in the values of slope and intercept for the linear regression equations governing carbonate-clumped isotope(Δ47) distribution with carbonate growth temperatures. These studies include the Δ47 measurement and analysis of either laboratory-grown or natural carbonates with precise knowledge of their precipitation/depositional temperatures. However, the discrepancies in the existing universal calibration schemes remained poorly understood despite adopting an identical data correction protocol. This is explained here by the reaction kinetics and CO2 collection methodologies adopted during experimentation. The present study investigated the slope and intercept values of the published carbonate clumped isotope thermometry equations expressed in the accepted Absolute Reference Frame (ARF in CDES) at 25 °C after accounting for the acid correction factor. We observe a systematic shift in the mean slope and intercept values of 0.0154(±0.007) and 0.153(±0.0686) ‰ for 70 °C reaction experiments and offset of 0.0181(±0.008) and 0.197(±0.079) ‰ for the experiments conducted at 90 °C by using the acid drip and/or Common Acid bath method, respectively from the slope and intercept values of the calibration equations proposed using sealed vessel method at 25 °C reaction temperature. The mean values for slope and intercept are compared using ANOVA and paired f-test. These correction factors for slopes and intercepts will allow the transformation of clumped isotope values at different temperatures into ARF scale at 25 °C and enable accurate deduction of temperature for carbonate samples. Correction factors proposed here account for variations in the sample preparation techniques arising due to different reaction temperatures, mechanisms and vapor pressure in the chamber for isotopic exchange reaction to happen for smaller or prolonged time intervals.

Abstract Image

基于样品制备技术的碳酸钙结块同位素(Δ47)测温方程校正方案
在碳酸盐结块同位素分析过程中实施的CO2制备方法用于碳酸盐的酸消化,目标是高样品吞吐量,从而产生了用于测温的多个经验关系。这些方法的差异很大,从最初使用密封容器法在25°C下进行碳酸盐反应,到分别在70°C或90°C温度下进行自动快速酸滴或普通酸浴法;这些方法明显不同。技术发展取代了原始反应方案,引入了不同的反应条件,导致化学反应程序和CO2捕集的显著差异,这导致控制碳酸盐聚集同位素(Δ47)分布的线性回归方程的斜率和截距值随碳酸盐生长温度的变化。这些研究包括对实验室生长或天然碳酸盐的Δ47测量和分析,并精确了解其沉淀/沉积温度。然而,尽管采用了相同的数据校正协议,但对现有通用校准方案中的差异仍知之甚少。这可以通过实验过程中采用的反应动力学和CO2收集方法来解释。本研究调查了已发表的碳酸盐结块同位素测温方程的斜率和截距值,该方程在考虑了酸校正因子后,在25°C时以公认的绝对参考系(CDES中的ARF)表示。我们观察到70°C反应实验的平均斜率和截距分别为0.0154(±0.007)和0.153(±0.0686)‰和0.0181(±0.008)和0.197(±0.079)‰,分别来自于在25°C反应温度下使用密封容器方法提出的校准方程的斜率和截距值。斜率和截距的平均值使用方差分析和配对f检验进行比较。这些斜率和截距的校正因子将允许将不同温度下的聚集同位素值转换为25°C下的ARF标度,并能够准确推断碳酸盐样品的温度。本文提出的校正因子考虑了由于同位素交换反应在较小或较长的时间间隔内发生的反应室中的不同反应温度、机理和蒸汽压而引起的样品制备技术的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geochemistry
Applied Geochemistry 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
272
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application. Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信