Estimation of lidar-based gridded DEM uncertainty with varying terrain roughness and point density

Luyen K. Bui , Craig L. Glennie
{"title":"Estimation of lidar-based gridded DEM uncertainty with varying terrain roughness and point density","authors":"Luyen K. Bui ,&nbsp;Craig L. Glennie","doi":"10.1016/j.ophoto.2022.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Light detection and ranging (lidar) scanning systems can be used to provide a point cloud with high quality and point density. Gridded digital elevation models (DEMs) interpolated from laser scanning point clouds are widely used due to their convenience, however, DEM uncertainty is rarely provided. This paper proposes an end-to-end workflow to quantify the uncertainty (i.e., standard deviation) of a gridded lidar-derived DEM. A benefit of the proposed approach is that it does not require independent validation data measured by alternative means. The input point cloud requires per point uncertainty which is derived from lidar system observational uncertainty. The propagated uncertainty caused by interpolation is then derived by the general law of propagation of variances (GLOPOV) with simultaneous consideration of both horizontal and vertical point cloud uncertainties. Finally, the interpolated uncertainty is then scaled by point density and a measure of terrain roughness to arrive at the final gridded DEM uncertainty. The proposed approach is tested with two lidar datasets measured in Waikoloa, Hawaii, and Sitka, Alaska. Triangulated irregular network (TIN) interpolation is chosen as the representative gridding approach. The results indicate estimated terrain roughness/point density scale factors ranging between 1 (in flat areas) and 7.6 (in high roughness areas), with a mean value of 2.3 for the Waikoloa dataset and between 1 and 9.2 with a mean value of 1.2 for the Sitka dataset. As a result, the final gridded DEM uncertainties are estimated between 0.059 m and 0.677 m with a mean value of 0.164 m for the Waikoloa dataset and between 0.059 m and 1.723 m with a mean value of 0.097 m for the Sitka dataset.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100730,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667393222000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Light detection and ranging (lidar) scanning systems can be used to provide a point cloud with high quality and point density. Gridded digital elevation models (DEMs) interpolated from laser scanning point clouds are widely used due to their convenience, however, DEM uncertainty is rarely provided. This paper proposes an end-to-end workflow to quantify the uncertainty (i.e., standard deviation) of a gridded lidar-derived DEM. A benefit of the proposed approach is that it does not require independent validation data measured by alternative means. The input point cloud requires per point uncertainty which is derived from lidar system observational uncertainty. The propagated uncertainty caused by interpolation is then derived by the general law of propagation of variances (GLOPOV) with simultaneous consideration of both horizontal and vertical point cloud uncertainties. Finally, the interpolated uncertainty is then scaled by point density and a measure of terrain roughness to arrive at the final gridded DEM uncertainty. The proposed approach is tested with two lidar datasets measured in Waikoloa, Hawaii, and Sitka, Alaska. Triangulated irregular network (TIN) interpolation is chosen as the representative gridding approach. The results indicate estimated terrain roughness/point density scale factors ranging between 1 (in flat areas) and 7.6 (in high roughness areas), with a mean value of 2.3 for the Waikoloa dataset and between 1 and 9.2 with a mean value of 1.2 for the Sitka dataset. As a result, the final gridded DEM uncertainties are estimated between 0.059 m and 0.677 m with a mean value of 0.164 m for the Waikoloa dataset and between 0.059 m and 1.723 m with a mean value of 0.097 m for the Sitka dataset.

随地形粗糙度和点密度变化的激光雷达网格DEM不确定性估计
光探测和测距(激光雷达)扫描系统可用于提供具有高质量和点密度的点云。激光扫描点云插值的网格化数字高程模型(DEM)由于其方便性而被广泛使用,但很少提供DEM的不确定性。本文提出了一种端到端的工作流程来量化网格激光雷达衍生DEM的不确定性(即标准差)。所提出的方法的一个好处是,它不需要通过替代方法测量的独立验证数据。输入点云需要每个点的不确定性,该不确定性源自激光雷达系统的观测不确定性。然后,在同时考虑水平和垂直点云不确定性的情况下,通过一般方差传播定律(GLOPOV)导出插值引起的传播不确定性。最后,通过点密度和地形粗糙度的测量来缩放插值的不确定性,以获得最终的网格DEM不确定性。该方法在夏威夷威科洛亚和阿拉斯加锡特卡的两个激光雷达数据集上进行了测试。选择不规则三角网(TIN)插值作为代表性的网格方法。结果表明,估计的地形粗糙度/点密度比例因子介于1(在平坦地区)和7.6(在高粗糙度地区)之间,Waikoloa数据集的平均值为2.3,Sitka数据集介于1和9.2之间,平均值为1.2。因此,Waikoloa数据集的最终网格DEM不确定性估计在0.059 m至0.677 m之间,平均值为0.164 m,Sitka数据集在0.059米至1.723 m之间,其平均值为0.097 m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信