Ethical dilemmas of teacher research in applied linguistics

Betsy Gilliland, Michelle Kunkel, Thu Ha Nguyen, Kristen Urada, Cade Christenson
{"title":"Ethical dilemmas of teacher research in applied linguistics","authors":"Betsy Gilliland,&nbsp;Michelle Kunkel,&nbsp;Thu Ha Nguyen,&nbsp;Kristen Urada,&nbsp;Cade Christenson","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Teacher research (TR) is teachers’ systematic examination of their pedagogy and/or their students’ learning within their own classrooms. Language TR presents different ethical dilemmas from other applied linguistics research due to the researcher's positioning and TR's situatedness. Teacher-researchers’ dual roles as instructor and researcher allow unique perspectives but also raise questions of subjectivity. Because TR is situated in specific contexts, teacher-researchers’ ethical decisions require special attention to interpersonal effects not captured in institutional ethics reviews. This article presents qualitative analyses of data collected during a semester-long graduate course introducing language teachers to classroom action research. We documented participants’ development as researchers through recorded class discussions and their reflective writing. We analyzed the data recursively, focusing on ethically important moments. Some ethical issues paralleled those in the TR literature while others were specific to each participant's context. Participants’ reflexivity was crucial for managing these context-specific dilemmas as some situations lacked a clear answer. We illustrate our findings with vignettes from participating teacher-researchers exemplifying these dilemmas. We conclude by discussing ongoing challenges in language TR and by recommending future directions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766123000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teacher research (TR) is teachers’ systematic examination of their pedagogy and/or their students’ learning within their own classrooms. Language TR presents different ethical dilemmas from other applied linguistics research due to the researcher's positioning and TR's situatedness. Teacher-researchers’ dual roles as instructor and researcher allow unique perspectives but also raise questions of subjectivity. Because TR is situated in specific contexts, teacher-researchers’ ethical decisions require special attention to interpersonal effects not captured in institutional ethics reviews. This article presents qualitative analyses of data collected during a semester-long graduate course introducing language teachers to classroom action research. We documented participants’ development as researchers through recorded class discussions and their reflective writing. We analyzed the data recursively, focusing on ethically important moments. Some ethical issues paralleled those in the TR literature while others were specific to each participant's context. Participants’ reflexivity was crucial for managing these context-specific dilemmas as some situations lacked a clear answer. We illustrate our findings with vignettes from participating teacher-researchers exemplifying these dilemmas. We conclude by discussing ongoing challenges in language TR and by recommending future directions.

应用语言学教师研究的伦理困境
教师研究(TR)是教师对其教学法和/或学生在自己课堂上的学习进行的系统检查。由于研究者的定位和TR的情境性,语言TR呈现出与其他应用语言学研究不同的伦理困境。教师研究者作为指导者和研究者的双重角色允许他们有独特的视角,但也提出了主观性问题。由于TR处于特定的背景下,教师研究人员的伦理决策需要特别关注机构伦理审查中没有捕捉到的人际影响。本文对为期一学期的研究生课程中收集的数据进行了定性分析,该课程将语言教师引入课堂行动研究。我们通过记录课堂讨论和他们的反思性写作,记录了参与者作为研究人员的发展。我们递归地分析数据,重点关注道德上重要的时刻。一些伦理问题与TR文献中的问题相似,而另一些则针对每个参与者的具体情况。参与者的自反性对于管理这些特定情境的困境至关重要,因为有些情况缺乏明确的答案。我们用参与的教师研究人员的小插曲来说明我们的发现,这些小插曲举例说明了这些困境。最后,我们讨论了TR语言中正在面临的挑战,并提出了未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信