Digital transformations of the urban – carbon – labor nexus: A research agenda

Eliot Tretter, Ryan Burns
{"title":"Digital transformations of the urban – carbon – labor nexus: A research agenda","authors":"Eliot Tretter,&nbsp;Ryan Burns","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digitalization is profoundly impacting natural resource extraction. Mines and wells are monitored and managed in new ways from real-time data streams to algorithmic decision-making to implementation of automated vehicles. How mines and wells are superintended is restructuring the geographies of employment as more of the day-to-day mining operations are centralized in urban locations distant from sites of extraction. Digital infrastructures allow for greater control over distant non-urban extractive geographies, but they also are remaking urban spaces. While the tendency today is to create ever more geographically extensive extractive-labor regimes, these regimes are increasingly modulated by digital technology advances, a feature that also central in the drive for cities to become “smart.”</p><p>Here, in a review of the literature, we theorize these transformations and show that they raise pressing new research questions at the (digitalized) nexus of urban — carbon — labor. We argue that to date, research, particularly that on digitalization, has at any time tended to focus on two of the three nodes in this nexus, and better integrating all 3 of them raises unique theoretical challenges. We offer 4 inquiries as an agenda that can guide future research. First, how should urban labor be brought to bear on digital extraction scholarship? Second, how is digitalization of carbon-extractive economies shaping social divisions of labor in the smart city? Third, does the datafication of “nature” in energy-extractive industries transform political ecology relations? Fourth, how does the particular context of the extractive industries make us rethink urban economies of digital labor?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378323000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digitalization is profoundly impacting natural resource extraction. Mines and wells are monitored and managed in new ways from real-time data streams to algorithmic decision-making to implementation of automated vehicles. How mines and wells are superintended is restructuring the geographies of employment as more of the day-to-day mining operations are centralized in urban locations distant from sites of extraction. Digital infrastructures allow for greater control over distant non-urban extractive geographies, but they also are remaking urban spaces. While the tendency today is to create ever more geographically extensive extractive-labor regimes, these regimes are increasingly modulated by digital technology advances, a feature that also central in the drive for cities to become “smart.”

Here, in a review of the literature, we theorize these transformations and show that they raise pressing new research questions at the (digitalized) nexus of urban — carbon — labor. We argue that to date, research, particularly that on digitalization, has at any time tended to focus on two of the three nodes in this nexus, and better integrating all 3 of them raises unique theoretical challenges. We offer 4 inquiries as an agenda that can guide future research. First, how should urban labor be brought to bear on digital extraction scholarship? Second, how is digitalization of carbon-extractive economies shaping social divisions of labor in the smart city? Third, does the datafication of “nature” in energy-extractive industries transform political ecology relations? Fourth, how does the particular context of the extractive industries make us rethink urban economies of digital labor?

城市-碳-劳动力关系的数字化转型:一个研究议程
数字化正在深刻影响自然资源开采。矿山和油井以新的方式进行监测和管理,从实时数据流到算法决策,再到自动化车辆的实施。随着越来越多的日常采矿作业集中在远离开采地点的城市地区,矿山和水井的监管方式正在重组就业地域。数字基础设施允许对遥远的非城市采掘地理进行更大的控制,但它们也在重塑城市空间。虽然今天的趋势是建立地理范围越来越广的采掘劳动制度,但这些制度越来越受到数字技术进步的影响,这一特征也是推动城市变得“智能”的核心,我们将这些转变理论化,并表明它们在城市-碳-劳动力的(数字化)关系方面提出了紧迫的新研究问题。我们认为,到目前为止,研究,特别是关于数字化的研究,在任何时候都倾向于关注这一关系中的三个节点中的两个,更好地整合这三个节点带来了独特的理论挑战。我们提供4项咨询,作为指导未来研究的议程。首先,应该如何让城市劳动力对数字提取奖学金产生影响?其次,碳采掘经济的数字化如何塑造智慧城市的社会分工?第三,能源采掘业中“自然”的数据化是否改变了政治生态关系?第四,采掘业的特殊背景如何让我们重新思考数字劳动力的城市经济?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信