Choice probabilities and correlations in closed-form route choice models: Specifications and drawbacks

Q1 Engineering
Fiore Tinessa, Vittorio Marzano, Fulvio Simonelli, Daniela Tocchi, Andrea Papola
{"title":"Choice probabilities and correlations in closed-form route choice models: Specifications and drawbacks","authors":"Fiore Tinessa,&nbsp;Vittorio Marzano,&nbsp;Fulvio Simonelli,&nbsp;Daniela Tocchi,&nbsp;Andrea Papola","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2023.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the performance – in terms of choice probabilities and correlations – of existing and new specifications of closed-form route choice models with flexible correlation patterns, namely the Link Nested Logit (LNL), the Paired Combinatorial Logit (PCL) and the more recent Combination of Nested Logit (CoNL) models. Following a consolidated track in the literature, choice probabilities and correlations of the Multinomial Probit (MNP) model are taken as targets. Laboratory experiments on small/medium-size networks are illustrated, also leveraging a procedure for practical calculation of correlations of any GEV models. Results show that models with inherent limitations in the coverage of the domain of feasible correlations yield unsatisfactory performance, whilst the specifications of the CoNL proposed in the paper appear the best in fitting both MNP correlations and probabilities. The performance of the models is appreciably ameliorated by introducing lower bounds to the nesting parameters. Overall, the paper provides guides for the practical application of tested models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X2300026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the performance – in terms of choice probabilities and correlations – of existing and new specifications of closed-form route choice models with flexible correlation patterns, namely the Link Nested Logit (LNL), the Paired Combinatorial Logit (PCL) and the more recent Combination of Nested Logit (CoNL) models. Following a consolidated track in the literature, choice probabilities and correlations of the Multinomial Probit (MNP) model are taken as targets. Laboratory experiments on small/medium-size networks are illustrated, also leveraging a procedure for practical calculation of correlations of any GEV models. Results show that models with inherent limitations in the coverage of the domain of feasible correlations yield unsatisfactory performance, whilst the specifications of the CoNL proposed in the paper appear the best in fitting both MNP correlations and probabilities. The performance of the models is appreciably ameliorated by introducing lower bounds to the nesting parameters. Overall, the paper provides guides for the practical application of tested models.

封闭路径选择模型中的选择概率和相关性:规范和缺点
本文研究了具有灵活相关性模式的封闭形式路线选择模型的现有和新规范的性能,即选择概率和相关性,即链接嵌套Logit(LNL)、配对组合Logit(PCL)和最近的嵌套Logit组合(CoNL)模型。遵循文献中的综合轨迹,以多项式问题(MNP)模型的选择概率和相关性为目标。对中小型网络的实验室实验进行了说明,还利用了任何GEV模型相关性的实际计算程序。结果表明,在可行相关性领域的覆盖范围内具有固有限制的模型产生了不令人满意的性能,而本文中提出的CoNL规范在拟合MNP相关性和概率方面表现得最好。通过引入嵌套参数的下限,模型的性能得到了明显的改善。总之,本文为测试模型的实际应用提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信