Spontaneous humanization of robots in passive observation of human-robot interaction: A path toward ethical consideration and human-robot cooperation

Nicolas Spatola , Emna Cherif
{"title":"Spontaneous humanization of robots in passive observation of human-robot interaction: A path toward ethical consideration and human-robot cooperation","authors":"Nicolas Spatola ,&nbsp;Emna Cherif","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As humanoid robots become more prevalent, understanding how people form initial representations of and attitudes towards these agents is crucial. This study investigated whether observing a human's emotional reactions towards a robot in a passive human-robot interaction influences the spontaneous humanization and mental state attributions of the robot, and subsequent ethical considerations and cooperation. In Experiment 1, Japanese and British participants observed videos of a human interacting emotionally or neutrally with a Pepper robot and then assessed the robot. Results showed the emotional video elicited more humanization and intentionality attributions towards the robot, subsequently predicting greater ethical concern, especially among Japanese participants. In Experiment 2, observing human emotional engagement increased cooperation with the robot in a Prisoner's Dilemma game through enhanced humanization and intentionality attributions. The findings suggest that passive observation of human-robot interactions can shape the representation, attribution, and treatment of robots based on culture and situational cues. This highlights the need to consider social factors that may influence people's developing relationships with robots.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As humanoid robots become more prevalent, understanding how people form initial representations of and attitudes towards these agents is crucial. This study investigated whether observing a human's emotional reactions towards a robot in a passive human-robot interaction influences the spontaneous humanization and mental state attributions of the robot, and subsequent ethical considerations and cooperation. In Experiment 1, Japanese and British participants observed videos of a human interacting emotionally or neutrally with a Pepper robot and then assessed the robot. Results showed the emotional video elicited more humanization and intentionality attributions towards the robot, subsequently predicting greater ethical concern, especially among Japanese participants. In Experiment 2, observing human emotional engagement increased cooperation with the robot in a Prisoner's Dilemma game through enhanced humanization and intentionality attributions. The findings suggest that passive observation of human-robot interactions can shape the representation, attribution, and treatment of robots based on culture and situational cues. This highlights the need to consider social factors that may influence people's developing relationships with robots.

被动观察人机交互中机器人的自发人性化:一条通往伦理考虑和人机合作的路径
随着人形机器人越来越普遍,了解人们如何形成对这些代理的最初表征和态度至关重要。本研究调查了在被动的人机互动中观察人类对机器人的情绪反应是否会影响机器人的自发人性化和精神状态归因,以及随后的伦理考虑和合作。在实验1中,日本和英国的参与者观察了一个人与Pepper机器人进行情感或中性互动的视频,然后对机器人进行了评估。结果显示,情绪视频引发了对机器人更多的人性化和意向性归因,随后预测了更大的伦理问题,尤其是在日本参与者中。在实验2中,在囚犯困境游戏中,观察人类的情感参与通过增强人性化和意向性归因来增加与机器人的合作。研究结果表明,对人机互动的被动观察可以基于文化和情境线索来塑造机器人的表现、归因和处理。这突出了考虑可能影响人们与机器人发展关系的社会因素的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信