A framework for analyzing authentication risks in account networks

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Daniela Pöhn , Nils Gruschka , Leonhard Ziegler , Andre Büttner
{"title":"A framework for analyzing authentication risks in account networks","authors":"Daniela Pöhn ,&nbsp;Nils Gruschka ,&nbsp;Leonhard Ziegler ,&nbsp;Andre Büttner","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2023.103515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Our everyday life depends more and more on online services and, therefore, access to related user accounts. The security of user accounts, again, is tied to the security of the corresponding primary and fallback authentication methods. Accounts can be linked to each other – by fallback authentication, through SSO, or by using the same </span>authentication devices<span> – creating an account network. These account networks enhance login comfort and are needed in case of account recovery, but they also increase each account's attack surface. In addition, misconfigurations might result in account inaccessibility. However, these problems can only be detected by analyzing single accounts first and then the resulting account networks. Despite the importance to understand account security and accessibility, almost no analysis methods exist.</span></p><p><span>To address this need, this article presents the Authentication Analysis Framework (AAF). AAF evaluates account types and primary and fallback authentication methods for each account, before analyzing the overall account network. By detecting transitive risks, weak links can be discovered and subsequently strengthened. We further propose maturity models to rank the primary and fallback authentication methods based on risks and a description language to exchange the required information. AAF is implemented as a plugin for the </span>password manager KeePass to assist end users and as a standalone tool for researchers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103515"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016740482300425X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our everyday life depends more and more on online services and, therefore, access to related user accounts. The security of user accounts, again, is tied to the security of the corresponding primary and fallback authentication methods. Accounts can be linked to each other – by fallback authentication, through SSO, or by using the same authentication devices – creating an account network. These account networks enhance login comfort and are needed in case of account recovery, but they also increase each account's attack surface. In addition, misconfigurations might result in account inaccessibility. However, these problems can only be detected by analyzing single accounts first and then the resulting account networks. Despite the importance to understand account security and accessibility, almost no analysis methods exist.

To address this need, this article presents the Authentication Analysis Framework (AAF). AAF evaluates account types and primary and fallback authentication methods for each account, before analyzing the overall account network. By detecting transitive risks, weak links can be discovered and subsequently strengthened. We further propose maturity models to rank the primary and fallback authentication methods based on risks and a description language to exchange the required information. AAF is implemented as a plugin for the password manager KeePass to assist end users and as a standalone tool for researchers.

帐户网络认证风险分析框架
我们的日常生活越来越依赖在线服务,因此也越来越依赖于访问相关用户帐户。用户帐户的安全性同样与相应的主身份验证方法和回退身份验证方法的安全性相关联。帐户可以通过回退身份验证、SSO或使用相同的身份验证设备相互链接,从而创建帐户网络。这些帐户网络增强了登录的舒适性,在帐户恢复的情况下是必要的,但它们也增加了每个帐户的攻击面。此外,错误配置可能导致帐户无法访问。然而,这些问题只能通过首先分析单个帐户,然后分析由此产生的帐户网络来检测。尽管了解帐户安全性和可访问性很重要,但几乎没有分析方法。为了满足这一需求,本文提出了身份验证分析框架(AAF)。在分析整个帐户网络之前,AAF评估每个帐户的帐户类型以及主要和后备身份验证方法。通过检测可传递的风险,可以发现薄弱环节并随后加以加强。我们进一步提出了成熟度模型,以根据风险对主要和后备身份验证方法进行排名,并提出了交换所需信息的描述语言。AAF是作为密码管理器KeePass的插件来帮助最终用户的,也是研究人员的独立工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信