MAILS - Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change- and meta-competencies

Astrid Carolus , Martin J. Koch , Samantha Straka , Marc Erich Latoschik , Carolin Wienrich
{"title":"MAILS - Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change- and meta-competencies","authors":"Astrid Carolus ,&nbsp;Martin J. Koch ,&nbsp;Samantha Straka ,&nbsp;Marc Erich Latoschik ,&nbsp;Carolin Wienrich","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Valid measurement of AI literacy is important for the selection of personnel, identification of shortages in skill and knowledge, and evaluation of AI literacy interventions. A questionnaire is missing that is deeply grounded in the existing literature on AI literacy, is modularly applicable depending on the goals, and includes further psychological competencies in addition to the typical facets of AIL. This paper presents the development and validation of a questionnaire considering the desiderata described above. We derived items to represent different facets of AI literacy and psychological competencies, such as problem-solving, learning, and emotion regulation in regard to AI. We collected data from 300 German-speaking adults to confirm the factorial structure. The result is the Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS) for AI literacy with the facets Use &amp; apply AI, Understand AI, Detect AI, and AI Ethics and the ability to Create AI as a separate construct, and AI Self-efficacy in learning and problem-solving and AI Self-management (i.e., AI persuasion literacy and emotion regulation). This study contributes to the research on AI literacy by providing a measurement instrument relying on profound competency models. Psychological competencies are included particularly important in the context of pervasive change through AI systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Valid measurement of AI literacy is important for the selection of personnel, identification of shortages in skill and knowledge, and evaluation of AI literacy interventions. A questionnaire is missing that is deeply grounded in the existing literature on AI literacy, is modularly applicable depending on the goals, and includes further psychological competencies in addition to the typical facets of AIL. This paper presents the development and validation of a questionnaire considering the desiderata described above. We derived items to represent different facets of AI literacy and psychological competencies, such as problem-solving, learning, and emotion regulation in regard to AI. We collected data from 300 German-speaking adults to confirm the factorial structure. The result is the Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS) for AI literacy with the facets Use & apply AI, Understand AI, Detect AI, and AI Ethics and the ability to Create AI as a separate construct, and AI Self-efficacy in learning and problem-solving and AI Self-management (i.e., AI persuasion literacy and emotion regulation). This study contributes to the research on AI literacy by providing a measurement instrument relying on profound competency models. Psychological competencies are included particularly important in the context of pervasive change through AI systems.

邮件-元人工智能素养量表:基于有充分根据的能力模型和心理变化及元能力,开发和测试人工智能素养问卷
人工智能素养的有效测量对于人员选择、技能和知识短缺的识别以及人工智能素养干预措施的评估非常重要。缺少一份问卷,该问卷深深植根于现有的人工智能素养文献,根据目标进行模块化应用,除了AIL的典型方面外,还包括进一步的心理能力。本文介绍了一份考虑到上述需求的问卷的开发和验证。我们推导了代表人工智能素养和心理能力的不同方面的项目,如人工智能的问题解决、学习和情绪调节。我们收集了300名讲德语的成年人的数据,以确认因子结构。结果是人工智能素养的元人工智能素养量表(MAILS);应用人工智能、理解人工智能、检测人工智能和人工智能伦理,以及将人工智能创建为一个单独的结构的能力,以及人工智能在学习和解决问题方面的自我效能感和人工智能自我管理(即人工智能说服能力和情绪调节)。本研究通过提供一种基于深度能力模型的测量工具,为人工智能素养的研究做出了贡献。在人工智能系统普遍变化的背景下,心理能力尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信