Comparison of poison plate and agar well diffusion method determining the antifungal activity of protein fractions

IF 4.7 Q1 ECOLOGY
Caleb Erhonyota , Great Iruoghene Edo , Favour Ogheneoruese Onoharigho
{"title":"Comparison of poison plate and agar well diffusion method determining the antifungal activity of protein fractions","authors":"Caleb Erhonyota ,&nbsp;Great Iruoghene Edo ,&nbsp;Favour Ogheneoruese Onoharigho","doi":"10.1016/j.chnaes.2022.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Medicinal plants are still being used as therapeutic agents in many developing nations because they are more widely available. This research aimed to compare method /result reliability between poison plate and agar well techniques in determining antifungal activity of protein fractions of plant samples. The </span>phytochemicals constituents present in the leaves (</span><span><span><em>Moringa</em><em> olifera, </em></span><em>Vernonia amygdalina</em><span><em>, </em><em>Annona muricata</em></span></span> and seeds/roots of <span><em>Garcinia kola</em><em>, Buccholzia coricea, Allium sativum</em></span> and <em>Zingiber officinale</em><span>) was extracted by air drying and subjecting them to maceration<span> in 75% ammonium sulphate. Thereafter, a sensitivity test was carried out using two methods; poisoned food technique to determine antifungal activity and agar well diffusion. The </span></span><em>in vitro</em> antimicrobial susceptibility test of the protein fractions was treated against selected fungi isolates (<em>Penicilium, Aspargilus</em> and <span><em>Rhizopus</em></span>). The results showed that the antifungal activities of <em>Garcinia kola</em> against selected microbes, at 100 mg for <span><em>Aspergillus</em><em> 1, Penicillin 1, Penicillin 3, Rhizopus and Aspergillus 3</em></span> for agar well showed, 0.00 ± 0.00, 18.1 ± 0.16, 18.0 ± 0.16, 20.0 ± 0.50, 0.00 ± 0.00, while in poison plate they exhibited 16.0 ± 0.00, 20.1 ± 0.16, 19.8 ± 0.28, 20.0 ± 2.00, 16.0 ± 0.50 respectively for each method. Also, the antifungal activities of <em>Zingiber officinale</em> showed a significant difference (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in poison plate technique than agar well when the concentration of the microbes where 100 mg, except for <em>Rhizopus</em> which showed similar result for both poison plate and agar well technique (15.8 + 0.16). The findings of the current research showed that poison plate technique is more sensitive to the antifungal activities in the protein fractions when compared to the agar well diffusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7048,"journal":{"name":"生态学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生态学报","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872203222000658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Medicinal plants are still being used as therapeutic agents in many developing nations because they are more widely available. This research aimed to compare method /result reliability between poison plate and agar well techniques in determining antifungal activity of protein fractions of plant samples. The phytochemicals constituents present in the leaves (Moringa olifera, Vernonia amygdalina, Annona muricata and seeds/roots of Garcinia kola, Buccholzia coricea, Allium sativum and Zingiber officinale) was extracted by air drying and subjecting them to maceration in 75% ammonium sulphate. Thereafter, a sensitivity test was carried out using two methods; poisoned food technique to determine antifungal activity and agar well diffusion. The in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test of the protein fractions was treated against selected fungi isolates (Penicilium, Aspargilus and Rhizopus). The results showed that the antifungal activities of Garcinia kola against selected microbes, at 100 mg for Aspergillus 1, Penicillin 1, Penicillin 3, Rhizopus and Aspergillus 3 for agar well showed, 0.00 ± 0.00, 18.1 ± 0.16, 18.0 ± 0.16, 20.0 ± 0.50, 0.00 ± 0.00, while in poison plate they exhibited 16.0 ± 0.00, 20.1 ± 0.16, 19.8 ± 0.28, 20.0 ± 2.00, 16.0 ± 0.50 respectively for each method. Also, the antifungal activities of Zingiber officinale showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in poison plate technique than agar well when the concentration of the microbes where 100 mg, except for Rhizopus which showed similar result for both poison plate and agar well technique (15.8 + 0.16). The findings of the current research showed that poison plate technique is more sensitive to the antifungal activities in the protein fractions when compared to the agar well diffusion.

毒板法与琼脂孔扩散法测定蛋白质组分抗真菌活性的比较
在许多发展中国家,药用植物仍被用作治疗剂,因为它们的供应更为广泛。本研究旨在比较毒平板法和琼脂平板法测定植物样品蛋白质组分抗真菌活性的方法/结果可靠性。通过空气干燥提取叶片中存在的植物化学成分(辣木、Vernonia amygalina、番荔枝和藤黄、西葫芦、大葱和姜的种子/根),并将其在75%硫酸铵中浸渍。此后,使用两种方法进行灵敏度测试;中毒食品技术测定抗真菌活性和琼脂扩散。蛋白质组分的体外抗菌药敏试验针对选定的真菌分离株(青霉、芦笋和根霉)进行。结果表明,藤黄对所选微生物的抗真菌活性在100mg时,对琼脂池中的曲霉菌1、青霉素1、青霉素3、根霉和曲霉菌3表现出0.00±0.00、18.1±0.16、18.0±0.16和20.0±0.50、0.00±0.00,每种方法分别为16.0±0.50。当微生物浓度为100mg,除根霉外,毒平板法和琼脂孔法的结果相似(15.8+0.16)。目前的研究结果表明,与琼脂孔扩散法相比,毒平板技术对蛋白质组分中的抗真菌活性更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
生态学报
生态学报 Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17028
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Our Journal publishes recent theories and novel experimental results in ecology, and facilitates academic exchange and discussions both domestically and abroad. It is expected that our journal will promote the development of and foster research talents for ecological studies in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信