A machine-learning approach for prediction of hospital mortality in cancer-related sepsis

YiRan He , YuJing Liu , YiMei Liu , HongYu He , WenJun Liu , DanLei Huang , ZhunYong Gu , MinJie Ju
{"title":"A machine-learning approach for prediction of hospital mortality in cancer-related sepsis","authors":"YiRan He ,&nbsp;YuJing Liu ,&nbsp;YiMei Liu ,&nbsp;HongYu He ,&nbsp;WenJun Liu ,&nbsp;DanLei Huang ,&nbsp;ZhunYong Gu ,&nbsp;MinJie Ju","doi":"10.1016/j.ceh.2023.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop a machine learning model to predict hospital mortality and identify risk factors in cancer-related sepsis patients<u>.</u></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We obtained data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV critical care data set, which included patients who diagnosed with cancer and fulfilled the definition of sepsis between 2008 and 2019. The data set was randomly split into a training set and a validation set. The dataset was imputed using the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) imputation model. An advanced machine learning model called CatBoost was established and then assessed by SHAP value.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 5081 patients were included in the final analysis. The cancer-related sepsis patients had a lower hospital survival (13.8% vs. 25.3%, P &lt; 0.001) than non-cancer-related patients.</p><p>For cancer-related sepsis patients, ensemble learning algorithms were superior to others with better accuracy and larger AUC, such as CatBoost (AUC: 0.828), LightGBM (AUC: 0.818), and Random Forest Classifier (AUC: 0.803). An evaluation of the performance suggested that the CatBoost model with the most powerful discrimination to predict hospital mortality, outperformed other models with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 74%. The best cutoff was 0.223 for the CatBoost model. In addition, CatBoost also outperformed other severity scores such as SAPS-II (AUC: 0.725) and SOFA (AUC: 0.682). Urine output and the minimum BUN level on admission were the most important features for the hospital mortality prediction of cancer-related sepsis, while the patients’ age and the urine output on admission for non-cancer-related patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For cancer-related sepsis patients, CatBoost model was a better prediction model. It was easy for clinicians to access by use of common clinical vital signs or laboratory examination parameters, which provides convenience for them to evaluate patient’s condition and make follow-up treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100268,"journal":{"name":"Clinical eHealth","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical eHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914123000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

To develop a machine learning model to predict hospital mortality and identify risk factors in cancer-related sepsis patients.

Method

We obtained data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV critical care data set, which included patients who diagnosed with cancer and fulfilled the definition of sepsis between 2008 and 2019. The data set was randomly split into a training set and a validation set. The dataset was imputed using the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) imputation model. An advanced machine learning model called CatBoost was established and then assessed by SHAP value.

Results

A total of 5081 patients were included in the final analysis. The cancer-related sepsis patients had a lower hospital survival (13.8% vs. 25.3%, P < 0.001) than non-cancer-related patients.

For cancer-related sepsis patients, ensemble learning algorithms were superior to others with better accuracy and larger AUC, such as CatBoost (AUC: 0.828), LightGBM (AUC: 0.818), and Random Forest Classifier (AUC: 0.803). An evaluation of the performance suggested that the CatBoost model with the most powerful discrimination to predict hospital mortality, outperformed other models with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 74%. The best cutoff was 0.223 for the CatBoost model. In addition, CatBoost also outperformed other severity scores such as SAPS-II (AUC: 0.725) and SOFA (AUC: 0.682). Urine output and the minimum BUN level on admission were the most important features for the hospital mortality prediction of cancer-related sepsis, while the patients’ age and the urine output on admission for non-cancer-related patients.

Conclusion

For cancer-related sepsis patients, CatBoost model was a better prediction model. It was easy for clinicians to access by use of common clinical vital signs or laboratory examination parameters, which provides convenience for them to evaluate patient’s condition and make follow-up treatments.

预测癌症相关败血症住院死亡率的机器学习方法
目的建立一种机器学习模型,用于预测癌症相关脓毒症患者的住院死亡率和识别危险因素。方法我们从重症监护医疗信息集市(MIMIC)-IV重症监护数据集获得数据,其中包括2008年至2019年间诊断为癌症并符合败血症定义的患者。数据集被随机分为训练集和验证集。使用K-最近邻(KNN)插补模型对数据集进行插补。建立了一个名为CatBoost的高级机器学习模型,并通过SHAP值进行了评估。结果纳入最终分析的患者共5081例。与非癌症相关的患者相比,癌症相关的败血症患者的住院生存率较低(13.8%对25.3%,P<;0.001)。对于癌症相关败血症患者,集合学习算法优于其他具有更好准确性和更大AUC的算法,如CatBoost(AUC:0.8828)、LightGBM(AUC=0.818)和随机森林分类器(AUC:8.83),优于其他模型,灵敏度为76%,特异性为74%。CatBoost模型的最佳截止值为0.223。此外,CatBoost还优于其他严重程度评分,如SAPS-II(AUC:0.725)和SOFA(AUC:6.682)。入院时的尿量和最低BUN水平是预测癌症相关脓毒症住院死亡率的最重要特征,而患者的年龄和非癌症相关患者入院时的尿液量。结论对于癌症相关性脓毒症患者,CatBoost模型是一种较好的预测模型。临床医生通过使用常见的临床生命体征或实验室检查参数很容易获得,这为他们评估患者的病情和进行后续治疗提供了便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信