The effect of mandibular implant overdentures on masticatory performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ioannis Tsolianos , Anna-Bettina Haidich , Dimitrios G. Goulis , Eleni Kotsiomiti
{"title":"The effect of mandibular implant overdentures on masticatory performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ioannis Tsolianos ,&nbsp;Anna-Bettina Haidich ,&nbsp;Dimitrios G. Goulis ,&nbsp;Eleni Kotsiomiti","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2023.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether masticatory performance was improved in edentulous patients wearing complete dentures, after the provision of mandibular implant overdentures.</p></div><div><h3>Type of studies reviewed</h3><p>Electronic search was conducted in three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL), while handsearching and gray literature assessment were also performed. Risk of bias was assessed via RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, according to study type. Meta-analysis was conducted by using inverse variance and random effects model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four randomized controlled trials and eight uncontrolled paired before-after studies were considered eligible for meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences between baseline and one, two, three, six and twelve months were -0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.34 to -0.61; I<sup>2</sup> = 99%), -1.28 (95% CI, -3.52 to 0.97; I<sup>2</sup> = 99%), -1.01 (95% CI, -1.58 to -0.43; I<sup>2</sup> = 99%), -1.09 (95% CI, -1.77 to -0.42; I<sup>2</sup> = 100%) and -1.31 (95% CI, -2.03 to -0.59; I<sup>2</sup> = 100%), respectively</p></div><div><h3>Practical implications</h3><p>In most time intervals the masticatory performance had a statistically significant continuous improvement, demonstrating the functional upgrading of the complete dentures brought by the implants. High heterogeneity was noted, as various variables and evaluation methods were used. Although six of 12 studies were characterized as “Low Risk of Bias”, strength of the evidence was found “Low” in seven studies. Not only more and higher quality studies but also a unique and reliable method for evaluation of masticatory performance are required for producing homogenous and robust results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277255962300010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether masticatory performance was improved in edentulous patients wearing complete dentures, after the provision of mandibular implant overdentures.

Type of studies reviewed

Electronic search was conducted in three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL), while handsearching and gray literature assessment were also performed. Risk of bias was assessed via RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, according to study type. Meta-analysis was conducted by using inverse variance and random effects model.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials and eight uncontrolled paired before-after studies were considered eligible for meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences between baseline and one, two, three, six and twelve months were -0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.34 to -0.61; I2 = 99%), -1.28 (95% CI, -3.52 to 0.97; I2 = 99%), -1.01 (95% CI, -1.58 to -0.43; I2 = 99%), -1.09 (95% CI, -1.77 to -0.42; I2 = 100%) and -1.31 (95% CI, -2.03 to -0.59; I2 = 100%), respectively

Practical implications

In most time intervals the masticatory performance had a statistically significant continuous improvement, demonstrating the functional upgrading of the complete dentures brought by the implants. High heterogeneity was noted, as various variables and evaluation methods were used. Although six of 12 studies were characterized as “Low Risk of Bias”, strength of the evidence was found “Low” in seven studies. Not only more and higher quality studies but also a unique and reliable method for evaluation of masticatory performance are required for producing homogenous and robust results.

下颌种植覆盖义齿对咀嚼功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是调查戴全口义齿的无牙患者在提供下颌种植覆盖义齿后,咀嚼性能是否得到改善。审查的研究类型在三个数据库(MEDLINE、Scopus、CENTRAL)中进行了电子搜索,同时还进行了手查和灰色文献评估。根据研究类型,通过RoB2和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。采用逆方差和随机效应模型进行Meta分析。结果4项随机对照试验和8项非对照配对前后研究符合荟萃分析条件。基线与1个月、2个月、3个月、6个月和12个月之间的标准化平均差异分别为-0.97(95%置信区间[CI],-1.34至-0.61;I2=99%)、-1.28(95%可信区间,-3.52至0.97;I2=90%)、-1.01(95%可信度,-1.58至-0.43;I2=999%)、-1.09,实际意义在大多数时间间隔内,咀嚼性能都有统计学上显著的持续改善,表明种植体对全口义齿的功能提升。由于使用了各种变量和评估方法,因此存在高度异质性。尽管12项研究中有6项被定性为“低偏倚风险”,但在7项研究中发现证据的强度“低”。为了产生均匀和稳健的结果,不仅需要更多、更高质量的研究,还需要一种独特可靠的咀嚼性能评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信