Evaluation of the viability of nanoparticles in drilling fluids as additive for fluid loss and wellbore stability

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Albertus Retnanto , Rommel Yrac , Abdullah Shaat , Adhika Retnanto , Laith Abughaush , Maha Al Sulaiti , Najla Badar
{"title":"Evaluation of the viability of nanoparticles in drilling fluids as additive for fluid loss and wellbore stability","authors":"Albertus Retnanto ,&nbsp;Rommel Yrac ,&nbsp;Abdullah Shaat ,&nbsp;Adhika Retnanto ,&nbsp;Laith Abughaush ,&nbsp;Maha Al Sulaiti ,&nbsp;Najla Badar","doi":"10.1016/j.petlm.2023.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wellbore instability is an issue that, if left untreated, can cause wells to collapse, resulting in human, environmental, equipment, and revenue losses. Drilling fluids have been used to enhance the drilling process by lubricating and cooling the drill bit, eliminating cuttings, and most importantly, by improving the stability of the well by preventing fluid loss. However, there has been an increase in operational demands and challenges that call for drilling fluids to be more effective, economical, sustainable, and environmentally friendly. With shales that have infinitesimally small pores, nanoparticle additives in drilling fluids can be crucial in providing the properties that are necessary to prevent fluid loss and provide wellbore stability while meeting the operational demands of the present day. Therefore, this paper examines the use of nanoparticle additives including copper (II) oxide (CuO), magnesium oxide (MgO), and aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) where they are tested under three conditions using the permeable plugging tester (PPT), high-temperature high-pressure (HTHP) fluid loss apparatus, and API low-temperature – low-pressure (LTLP) fluid loss apparatus under concentrations of 0.03% and 0.10%. Finally, based on the results, each nanoparticle sample (particle sizes between one and 100 nm) performed well in contributing to the aim of this project. CuO is the most effective inhibitor across all concentrations and under the three different conditions. It contributed to reducing the fluid loss from 37.6 mL to 18.2 and 13.2 mL, which is between 52% and 65% of fluid reduction. For MgO, it contributed to fluid loss reduction to 23.8 mL and 15 mL, which translated to 37%–60% of fluid loss reduction. The use of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles resulted in a fluid loss reduction to 33.6 mL and 17.8 mL, reducing the fluid loss up to 11%, at HTHP and up to 53% at LTLP. Unlike CuO and MgO, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was less effective under HTHP conditions when compared to LTLP conditions. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> did not suffer as a significant diminishing benefit with increasing concentration in LTLP conditions however which means that at a higher concentration, it may begin to be more effective. Each material used in this study has its own specific and technical characteristics that will help create a progressive amount of property, such as providing stability and withstanding the high-temperature and high-pressure condition downhole.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37433,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 342-351"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656123000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Wellbore instability is an issue that, if left untreated, can cause wells to collapse, resulting in human, environmental, equipment, and revenue losses. Drilling fluids have been used to enhance the drilling process by lubricating and cooling the drill bit, eliminating cuttings, and most importantly, by improving the stability of the well by preventing fluid loss. However, there has been an increase in operational demands and challenges that call for drilling fluids to be more effective, economical, sustainable, and environmentally friendly. With shales that have infinitesimally small pores, nanoparticle additives in drilling fluids can be crucial in providing the properties that are necessary to prevent fluid loss and provide wellbore stability while meeting the operational demands of the present day. Therefore, this paper examines the use of nanoparticle additives including copper (II) oxide (CuO), magnesium oxide (MgO), and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) where they are tested under three conditions using the permeable plugging tester (PPT), high-temperature high-pressure (HTHP) fluid loss apparatus, and API low-temperature – low-pressure (LTLP) fluid loss apparatus under concentrations of 0.03% and 0.10%. Finally, based on the results, each nanoparticle sample (particle sizes between one and 100 nm) performed well in contributing to the aim of this project. CuO is the most effective inhibitor across all concentrations and under the three different conditions. It contributed to reducing the fluid loss from 37.6 mL to 18.2 and 13.2 mL, which is between 52% and 65% of fluid reduction. For MgO, it contributed to fluid loss reduction to 23.8 mL and 15 mL, which translated to 37%–60% of fluid loss reduction. The use of Al2O3 nanoparticles resulted in a fluid loss reduction to 33.6 mL and 17.8 mL, reducing the fluid loss up to 11%, at HTHP and up to 53% at LTLP. Unlike CuO and MgO, Al2O3 was less effective under HTHP conditions when compared to LTLP conditions. Al2O3 did not suffer as a significant diminishing benefit with increasing concentration in LTLP conditions however which means that at a higher concentration, it may begin to be more effective. Each material used in this study has its own specific and technical characteristics that will help create a progressive amount of property, such as providing stability and withstanding the high-temperature and high-pressure condition downhole.

评价钻井液中纳米颗粒作为降滤失剂和井眼稳定性添加剂的可行性
井筒不稳定是一个问题,如果不加以处理,可能会导致油井坍塌,导致人员、环境、设备和收入损失。钻井液已被用于通过润滑和冷却钻头、消除岩屑来增强钻井过程,最重要的是,通过防止流体损失来提高井的稳定性。然而,操作需求和挑战不断增加,要求钻井液更加有效、经济、可持续和环保。对于具有无限小孔隙的页岩,钻井液中的纳米颗粒添加剂在提供防止流体损失和提供井筒稳定性所需的性能方面至关重要,同时满足当今的操作需求。因此,本文考察了包括氧化铜(II)(CuO)、氧化镁(MgO)和氧化铝(Al2O3)在内的纳米颗粒添加剂的使用,其中使用渗透封堵测试仪(PPT)、高温高压(HTHP)流体损失仪、,以及API低温低压(LTLP)流体损失装置,浓度分别为0.03%和0.10%。最后,根据结果,每个纳米颗粒样品(粒径在1至100 nm之间)在实现本项目目标方面表现良好。CuO是所有浓度和三种不同条件下最有效的抑制剂。它有助于将液体损失从37.6 mL减少到18.2和13.2 mL,这在液体减少的52%和65%之间。对于MgO,它有助于将流体损失减少到23.8 mL和15 mL,这意味着流体损失减少了37%-60%。Al2O3纳米颗粒的使用导致流体损失分别减少到33.6 mL和17.8 mL,在HTHP和LTLP下分别减少了高达11%和53%的流体损失。与CuO和MgO不同,与LTLP条件相比,Al2O3在HTHP条件下的效果较差。然而,在LTLP条件下,Al2O3没有随着浓度的增加而显著减少,这意味着在更高的浓度下,它可能开始更有效。本研究中使用的每种材料都有自己的特定和技术特征,这将有助于创造渐进的性能,例如提供稳定性并承受井下的高温和高压条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Petroleum
Petroleum Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
124 days
期刊介绍: Examples of appropriate topical areas that will be considered include the following: 1.comprehensive research on oil and gas reservoir (reservoir geology): -geological basis of oil and gas reservoirs -reservoir geochemistry -reservoir formation mechanism -reservoir identification methods and techniques 2.kinetics of oil and gas basins and analyses of potential oil and gas resources: -fine description factors of hydrocarbon accumulation -mechanism analysis on recovery and dynamic accumulation process -relationship between accumulation factors and the accumulation process -analysis of oil and gas potential resource 3.theories and methods for complex reservoir geophysical prospecting: -geophysical basis of deep geologic structures and background of hydrocarbon occurrence -geophysical prediction of deep and complex reservoirs -physical test analyses and numerical simulations of reservoir rocks -anisotropic medium seismic imaging theory and new technology for multiwave seismic exploration -o theories and methods for reservoir fluid geophysical identification and prediction 4.theories, methods, technology, and design for complex reservoir development: -reservoir percolation theory and application technology -field development theories and methods -theory and technology for enhancing recovery efficiency 5.working liquid for oil and gas wells and reservoir protection technology: -working chemicals and mechanics for oil and gas wells -reservoir protection technology 6.new techniques and technologies for oil and gas drilling and production: -under-balanced drilling/gas drilling -special-track well drilling -cementing and completion of oil and gas wells -engineering safety applications for oil and gas wells -new technology of fracture acidizing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信