Nurses’ education, knowledge and perceptions of peripheral intravenous catheter management: A web-based, cross-sectional survey

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Debbie Massey , Marie Cooke , Gillian Ray-Barruel , Nicole Marsh , Amanda J. Ullman , Alison Craswell , Marianne Wallis
{"title":"Nurses’ education, knowledge and perceptions of peripheral intravenous catheter management: A web-based, cross-sectional survey","authors":"Debbie Massey ,&nbsp;Marie Cooke ,&nbsp;Gillian Ray-Barruel ,&nbsp;Nicole Marsh ,&nbsp;Amanda J. Ullman ,&nbsp;Alison Craswell ,&nbsp;Marianne Wallis","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most used invasive medical device. Unfortunately, PIVCs fail for a variety of reasons and failure often results in serious adverse events leading to patient discomfort, infection, delays in treatment, increased healthcare costs, and even death. In Australia, qualified nurses assess, manage, and remove a PIVC as part of their clinical role. To date, no study has described the current state of knowledge and confidence (self-efficacy) about PIVCs from the perspectives of qualified nurses working in Australian hospital settings.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To describe the current state of knowledge and confidence (self-efficacy) about PIVC management from the perspectives of qualified nurses working in Australian hospital settings. To explore how these related to the education received by these nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Qualified nurses in Australia thought that education about PIVCs was important and that it should be underpinned by evidence-based guidelines. Knowledge Test score for the sample was 12.4/17 (SD 2.1), this equates to a mean grade of 73.0%. Respondents reported very high levels of confidence about caring for a patient with a PIVC in situ.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the frequent and increasing use of PIVCs and importantly the documented adverse events associated with poor assessment, management and inappropriate removal, qualified nurses’ knowledge and confidence remain poorly reported. We demonstrated fundamental gaps in qualified nurses’ knowledge in relation to assessment, management, and removal of PIVCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 578-585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most used invasive medical device. Unfortunately, PIVCs fail for a variety of reasons and failure often results in serious adverse events leading to patient discomfort, infection, delays in treatment, increased healthcare costs, and even death. In Australia, qualified nurses assess, manage, and remove a PIVC as part of their clinical role. To date, no study has described the current state of knowledge and confidence (self-efficacy) about PIVCs from the perspectives of qualified nurses working in Australian hospital settings.

Aims

To describe the current state of knowledge and confidence (self-efficacy) about PIVC management from the perspectives of qualified nurses working in Australian hospital settings. To explore how these related to the education received by these nurses.

Methods

An online cross-sectional survey.

Findings

Qualified nurses in Australia thought that education about PIVCs was important and that it should be underpinned by evidence-based guidelines. Knowledge Test score for the sample was 12.4/17 (SD 2.1), this equates to a mean grade of 73.0%. Respondents reported very high levels of confidence about caring for a patient with a PIVC in situ.

Conclusion

Despite the frequent and increasing use of PIVCs and importantly the documented adverse events associated with poor assessment, management and inappropriate removal, qualified nurses’ knowledge and confidence remain poorly reported. We demonstrated fundamental gaps in qualified nurses’ knowledge in relation to assessment, management, and removal of PIVCs.

护士对外周静脉导管管理的教育、知识和认知:一项基于网络的横断面调查
背景外周静脉导管(PIVC)是最常用的有创医疗器械。不幸的是,PIVC失败的原因多种多样,失败往往会导致严重的不良事件,导致患者不适、感染、治疗延误、医疗费用增加,甚至死亡。在澳大利亚,合格的护士将评估、管理和移除PIVC作为其临床职责的一部分。到目前为止,没有任何研究从在澳大利亚医院工作的合格护士的角度描述PIVC的知识和信心(自我效能)的现状。目的从在澳大利亚医院工作的合格护士的角度描述PIVC管理的知识和信心(自我效能)现状。探讨这些与这些护士所接受的教育之间的关系。方法在线横断面调查。澳大利亚合格护士认为,PIVC的教育很重要,应该以循证指南为基础。样本的知识测试得分为12.4/17(SD 2.1),相当于73.0%的平均分数。受访者报告称,他们对现场护理PIVC患者有很高的信心。结论尽管PIVC的使用频繁且不断增加,而且重要的是,记录在案的不良事件与评估、管理不善和不适当的移除有关,但合格护士的知识和信心仍然很少被报道。我们展示了合格护士在评估、管理和移除PIVC方面的知识存在根本差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信