Forces and movements during tooth extraction: A scoping review

M.G. Beuling , P.C.G. Agterbos , T.C.T. van Riet , J.P.T.F. Ho , R. de Vries , J. Kober , J. de Lange
{"title":"Forces and movements during tooth extraction: A scoping review","authors":"M.G. Beuling ,&nbsp;P.C.G. Agterbos ,&nbsp;T.C.T. van Riet ,&nbsp;J.P.T.F. Ho ,&nbsp;R. de Vries ,&nbsp;J. Kober ,&nbsp;J. de Lange","doi":"10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this scoping review was to provide a clear and comprehensive overview of the available literature on forces and movements during tooth extraction. A systematic search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection) and Scopus from inception up to February 11th, 2022. All literature in which tooth extractions were performed and forces and/or movements were measured quantitatively were included. A total of 1975 articles were screened and after selection 17 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. Among others, the following data was collected: characteristics of measurements, type of study, material, types of teeth extracted, method of extraction, clinical metadata, and outcome measure. For most included papers the translation of the reported data to clinically relevant results was difficult. Most included articles only measured forces and torques (n = 16) and no movements. Furthermore, measurements were performed in only one or two of the six axes of movement (three translational axes and three rotational axes) (n = 15). In addition, a large heterogeneity in outcome measures was reported and the reported metadata in the papers is scarce, especially in the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>ex vivo</em> studies. In conclusion, this scoping review showed a strong limitation of our fundamental knowledge of these frequently performed procedures. More quantitative research is necessary to improve our understanding of the tooth extraction procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100051,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147623000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this scoping review was to provide a clear and comprehensive overview of the available literature on forces and movements during tooth extraction. A systematic search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection) and Scopus from inception up to February 11th, 2022. All literature in which tooth extractions were performed and forces and/or movements were measured quantitatively were included. A total of 1975 articles were screened and after selection 17 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. Among others, the following data was collected: characteristics of measurements, type of study, material, types of teeth extracted, method of extraction, clinical metadata, and outcome measure. For most included papers the translation of the reported data to clinically relevant results was difficult. Most included articles only measured forces and torques (n = 16) and no movements. Furthermore, measurements were performed in only one or two of the six axes of movement (three translational axes and three rotational axes) (n = 15). In addition, a large heterogeneity in outcome measures was reported and the reported metadata in the papers is scarce, especially in the in vitro and ex vivo studies. In conclusion, this scoping review showed a strong limitation of our fundamental knowledge of these frequently performed procedures. More quantitative research is necessary to improve our understanding of the tooth extraction procedure.

拔牙过程中的力和运动:范围回顾
本次范围界定审查的目的是对现有的关于拔牙过程中的力和运动的文献进行清晰、全面的概述。从成立到2022年2月11日,在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science(核心收藏)和Scopus进行了系统的搜索策略。包括所有进行拔牙并定量测量力和/或运动的文献。共筛选了1975篇文章,经过筛选,纳入了17篇文章进行定性综合。除其他外,收集了以下数据:测量特征、研究类型、材料、拔牙类型、拔牙方法、临床元数据和结果测量。对于大多数收录的论文来说,将报告的数据转化为临床相关结果是困难的。大多数收录的文章只测量了力和力矩(n=16),没有运动。此外,仅在六个运动轴(三个平移轴和三个旋转轴)中的一个或两个轴上进行测量(n=15)。此外,据报道,结果测量存在很大的异质性,论文中报道的元数据很少,尤其是在体外和离体研究中。总之,这一范围界定审查表明,我们对这些经常执行的程序的基本知识存在很大的局限性。有必要进行更多的定量研究,以提高我们对拔牙过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信