Application of stochastic Bayesian modeling to assess quality and safety profile of tea in China market

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Yongheng Yang, Shizhong Qin, Dongye Sun, Ruyi Sha, Jianwei Mao
{"title":"Application of stochastic Bayesian modeling to assess quality and safety profile of tea in China market","authors":"Yongheng Yang,&nbsp;Shizhong Qin,&nbsp;Dongye Sun,&nbsp;Ruyi Sha,&nbsp;Jianwei Mao","doi":"10.1007/s00769-023-01532-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Limited information was available on the quality and safety profile of tea in China, even though food quality and safety of tea is an issue of great concern to consumers and the public. Stochastic Bayesian modeling was employed in this study to investigate food quality and safety profile of tea in China market. Results indicated that the overall nonconforming rate (95 % CI, confidence interval) of tea was 2.6 ‰ (1.3 ‰ to 4.5 ‰), indicating a high level for the quality and safety status of tea in market. Pesticide residues exceeding maximal limit (MRLs) was the major cause leading to nonconformity of tea, with estimated incidences (95 % CI) of 11.7 ‰ (0.5 ‰ to 53.2 ‰), 1.1 ‰ (0.4 ‰ to 2.0 ‰), 2.3 ‰ (0.6 ‰ to 5.5 ‰), and 0.55 ‰ (0.06 ‰ to 1.51 ‰), respectively, for Yellow tea, Green tea, and Oolong tea; whereas illegal application of additives was more likely to occur in black tea, with an incidence of 1.1 ‰ (0.4 ‰ to 2.7 ‰), despite that an estimated incidence of 2.9 ‰ (0.4 ‰ to 16.1 ‰) was generated for Yellow tea due to fewer inspects and small sample sizes involved for analysis. The difference in quality and safety status of tea between provinces was statistically insignificant, as indicated by overlapped 95 % CIs of nonconforming rates. Results of this study provided reliable information on quality and safety profile of tea in China market, and suggested that application of pesticides during tea plantation and illegal use of additives during black tea production worth more attention in respect of quality and safety of tea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"28 1","pages":"49 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-023-01532-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01532-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited information was available on the quality and safety profile of tea in China, even though food quality and safety of tea is an issue of great concern to consumers and the public. Stochastic Bayesian modeling was employed in this study to investigate food quality and safety profile of tea in China market. Results indicated that the overall nonconforming rate (95 % CI, confidence interval) of tea was 2.6 ‰ (1.3 ‰ to 4.5 ‰), indicating a high level for the quality and safety status of tea in market. Pesticide residues exceeding maximal limit (MRLs) was the major cause leading to nonconformity of tea, with estimated incidences (95 % CI) of 11.7 ‰ (0.5 ‰ to 53.2 ‰), 1.1 ‰ (0.4 ‰ to 2.0 ‰), 2.3 ‰ (0.6 ‰ to 5.5 ‰), and 0.55 ‰ (0.06 ‰ to 1.51 ‰), respectively, for Yellow tea, Green tea, and Oolong tea; whereas illegal application of additives was more likely to occur in black tea, with an incidence of 1.1 ‰ (0.4 ‰ to 2.7 ‰), despite that an estimated incidence of 2.9 ‰ (0.4 ‰ to 16.1 ‰) was generated for Yellow tea due to fewer inspects and small sample sizes involved for analysis. The difference in quality and safety status of tea between provinces was statistically insignificant, as indicated by overlapped 95 % CIs of nonconforming rates. Results of this study provided reliable information on quality and safety profile of tea in China market, and suggested that application of pesticides during tea plantation and illegal use of additives during black tea production worth more attention in respect of quality and safety of tea.

Abstract Image

随机贝叶斯模型在中国茶叶质量安全评价中的应用
尽管茶叶的食品质量和安全是消费者和公众非常关注的问题,但关于中国茶叶质量和安全概况的信息有限。本文采用随机贝叶斯模型对中国市场茶叶的食品质量安全状况进行了研究。结果表明,茶叶的总体不合格率(95% CI,置信区间)为2.6‰(1.3‰~ 4.5‰),表明茶叶的市场质量安全状况处于较高水平。农药残留超标(MRLs)是导致茶叶不合格的主要原因,黄茶、绿茶和乌龙茶的估计发生率(95% CI)分别为11.7‰(0.5‰~ 53.2‰)、1.1‰(0.4‰~ 2.0‰)、2.3‰(0.6‰~ 5.5‰)和0.55‰(0.06‰~ 1.51‰);而非法使用添加剂更有可能发生在红茶中,发生率为1.1‰(0.4‰至2.7‰),尽管黄茶的发生率估计为2.9‰(0.4‰至16.1‰),原因是检查次数较少,用于分析的样本量较小。各省间茶叶质量安全状况差异无统计学意义,不合格率95% ci重叠。本研究结果为中国市场茶叶的质量安全状况提供了可靠的信息,并建议在茶叶种植过程中使用农药和在红茶生产过程中非法使用添加剂应引起更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信