Improving the Quality and Utility of Electronic Health Record Data through Ontologies.

Standards (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.3390/standards3030023
Asiyah Yu Lin, Sivaram Arabandi, Thomas Beale, William D Duncan, Amanda Hicks, William R Hogan, Mark Jensen, Ross Koppel, Catalina Martínez-Costa, Øystein Nytrø, Jihad S Obeid, Jose Parente de Oliveira, Alan Ruttenberg, Selja Seppälä, Barry Smith, Dagobert Soergel, Jie Zheng, Stefan Schulz
{"title":"Improving the Quality and Utility of Electronic Health Record Data through Ontologies.","authors":"Asiyah Yu Lin,&nbsp;Sivaram Arabandi,&nbsp;Thomas Beale,&nbsp;William D Duncan,&nbsp;Amanda Hicks,&nbsp;William R Hogan,&nbsp;Mark Jensen,&nbsp;Ross Koppel,&nbsp;Catalina Martínez-Costa,&nbsp;Øystein Nytrø,&nbsp;Jihad S Obeid,&nbsp;Jose Parente de Oliveira,&nbsp;Alan Ruttenberg,&nbsp;Selja Seppälä,&nbsp;Barry Smith,&nbsp;Dagobert Soergel,&nbsp;Jie Zheng,&nbsp;Stefan Schulz","doi":"10.3390/standards3030023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The translational research community, in general, and the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) community, in particular, share the vision of repurposing EHRs for research that will improve the quality of clinical practice. Many members of these communities are also aware that electronic health records (EHRs) suffer limitations of data becoming poorly structured, biased, and unusable out of original context. This creates obstacles to the continuity of care, utility, quality improvement, and translational research. Analogous limitations to sharing objective data in other areas of the natural sciences have been successfully overcome by developing and using common ontologies. This White Paper presents the authors' rationale for the use of ontologies with computable semantics for the improvement of clinical data quality and EHR usability formulated for researchers with a stake in clinical and translational science and who are advocates for the use of information technology in medicine but at the same time are concerned by current major shortfalls. This White Paper outlines pitfalls, opportunities, and solutions and recommends increased investment in research and development of ontologies with computable semantics for a new generation of EHRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101332,"journal":{"name":"Standards (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"3 3","pages":"316-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Standards (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/standards3030023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The translational research community, in general, and the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) community, in particular, share the vision of repurposing EHRs for research that will improve the quality of clinical practice. Many members of these communities are also aware that electronic health records (EHRs) suffer limitations of data becoming poorly structured, biased, and unusable out of original context. This creates obstacles to the continuity of care, utility, quality improvement, and translational research. Analogous limitations to sharing objective data in other areas of the natural sciences have been successfully overcome by developing and using common ontologies. This White Paper presents the authors' rationale for the use of ontologies with computable semantics for the improvement of clinical data quality and EHR usability formulated for researchers with a stake in clinical and translational science and who are advocates for the use of information technology in medicine but at the same time are concerned by current major shortfalls. This White Paper outlines pitfalls, opportunities, and solutions and recommends increased investment in research and development of ontologies with computable semantics for a new generation of EHRs.

通过本体论提高电子健康记录数据的质量和实用性。
一般来说,转化研究界,尤其是临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)界,都有将EHR重新用于提高临床实践质量的研究的愿景。这些社区的许多成员也意识到,电子健康记录(EHR)受到数据结构不良、有偏见和无法使用的限制。这对护理、效用、质量改进和转化研究的连续性造成了障碍。通过开发和使用共同本体论,自然科学其他领域共享客观数据的类似限制已被成功克服。本白皮书介绍了作者使用具有可计算语义的本体论来提高临床数据质量和EHR可用性的基本原理,这些本体论是为与临床和转化科学有利害关系的研究人员制定的,他们是在医学中使用信息技术的倡导者,但同时也对当前的主要不足感到担忧。本白皮书概述了陷阱、机遇和解决方案,并建议为新一代EHR增加对具有可计算语义的本体的研究和开发的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信