Associations Between Object Control Skills and Cognitive Functions in Boys, Younger and Older Men: Across-Sectional Study.

Benjamin Holfelder, Nadja Schott
{"title":"Associations Between Object Control Skills and Cognitive Functions in Boys, Younger and Older Men: Across-Sectional Study.","authors":"Benjamin Holfelder, Nadja Schott","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2023.2265446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to explore the association of cognitive function and process- as well product-oriented outcomes of object control skills (OCS) in boys, younger and older men. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 77 male participants took part in this study, including 35 primary school children (9.04 ± 0.53 years), 22 younger adults (23.5 ± 2.34 years), and 20 older adults (69.5 ± 4.43 years). We assessed the process-oriented performance of throwing, kicking, and catching performance using the component approach. For the product-oriented performance, throwing and kicking velocity was recorded with a STALKER SOLO 2.0 radar gun. For catching, the number of caught balls was assessed. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Trail-Making-Test (TMT) one day later. <b>Results:</b> Younger adults performed better in both domains than the other two groups. The results of the children and older adults were comparable in the motor and cognitive domains. However, the older adults yielded significantly better results for the process-oriented catching and product-oriented throwing performances. Moderate to strong correlations exist between OCS- and TMT performance, with significant correlations predominantly between product-oriented OCS results and TMT in children. <b>Conclusion:</b> The results of both domains support a hypothetical lifespan developmental trajectory with a progression from childhood to younger adult age and a degression in older adults. Furthermore, our results suggest that the suspected relationship between motor and cognitive function depends on age, the analyzed cognitive and motor skills, and the applied methodological approach (process-oriented vs. product-oriented).</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2023.2265446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the association of cognitive function and process- as well product-oriented outcomes of object control skills (OCS) in boys, younger and older men. Methods: A total of 77 male participants took part in this study, including 35 primary school children (9.04 ± 0.53 years), 22 younger adults (23.5 ± 2.34 years), and 20 older adults (69.5 ± 4.43 years). We assessed the process-oriented performance of throwing, kicking, and catching performance using the component approach. For the product-oriented performance, throwing and kicking velocity was recorded with a STALKER SOLO 2.0 radar gun. For catching, the number of caught balls was assessed. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Trail-Making-Test (TMT) one day later. Results: Younger adults performed better in both domains than the other two groups. The results of the children and older adults were comparable in the motor and cognitive domains. However, the older adults yielded significantly better results for the process-oriented catching and product-oriented throwing performances. Moderate to strong correlations exist between OCS- and TMT performance, with significant correlations predominantly between product-oriented OCS results and TMT in children. Conclusion: The results of both domains support a hypothetical lifespan developmental trajectory with a progression from childhood to younger adult age and a degression in older adults. Furthermore, our results suggest that the suspected relationship between motor and cognitive function depends on age, the analyzed cognitive and motor skills, and the applied methodological approach (process-oriented vs. product-oriented).

男孩、年轻人和老年人的对象控制技能和认知功能之间的关系:跨部门研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨男孩、年轻人和老年人的认知功能与对象控制技能(OCS)的过程和产品导向结果之间的关系。方法:共有77名男性参与者参与了这项研究,其中包括35名小学生(9.04 ± 0.53 年龄),22名年轻人(23.5 ± 2.34 岁)和20名老年人(69.5 ± 4.43 年)。我们使用组件方法评估了投掷、踢球和接球的过程导向性能。对于面向产品的性能,投掷和踢腿速度是用STALKER SOLO 2.0雷达枪记录的。对于接球,评估接球的数量。认知功能在一天后使用追踪测试(TMT)进行评估。结果:年轻人在这两个领域的表现都比其他两组好。儿童和老年人的结果在运动和认知领域具有可比性。然而,老年人在以过程为导向的接球和以产品为导向的投掷表演中取得了明显更好的成绩。OCS和TMT表现之间存在中度到强烈的相关性,主要在面向产品的OCS结果和儿童TMT之间存在显著相关性。结论:这两个领域的结果都支持一个假设的寿命发展轨迹,即从儿童到年轻人年龄的发展和老年人的衰退。此外,我们的研究结果表明,运动和认知功能之间的可疑关系取决于年龄、分析的认知和运动技能以及应用的方法论方法(过程导向与产品导向)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信