Comparison between preoperative hook-wire and liquid material localization for pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Si-Jia Wang, Xing-Xing Gao, Hui Hui, Na Li, Yun Zhou, Hai-Tao Yin
{"title":"Comparison between preoperative hook-wire and liquid material localization for pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Si-Jia Wang,&nbsp;Xing-Xing Gao,&nbsp;Hui Hui,&nbsp;Na Li,&nbsp;Yun Zhou,&nbsp;Hai-Tao Yin","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2023.130330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Computed tomography (CT)-guided liquid material (LM) and hook-wire (HW) are usually localized for pulmonary nodules (PNs) before video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection, but the relative advantages of these 2 techniques remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This meta-analysis was conceived to juxtapose the efficacy and safety of HW localization (HWL) and LM localization (LML), both guided by CT, for the preoperative localization of PNs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases were searched to identify relevant studies published as of March 2023, after which pooled analyses of study outcomes were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies were included in this meta-analysis from 142 relevant studies. These 7 studies included 551 patients (583 PNs) with CT-guided HWL and 551 patients (612 PNs) with LML. The successful localization rate was significantly higher in the LM group (LMG) than in the HW group (HWG) (p = 0.002). The LMG also exhibited significantly lower pooled total complication and lung haemorrhage rates than the HWG (p = 0.007 and 0.00001, respectively). Pooled localization duration, pneumothorax rates, and VATS procedure duration were comparable in both groups (p = 0.45, 0.15, and 0.74, respectively). Furthermore, the pooled postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LMG than in the HWG (p = 0.009). Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of localization duration and pneumothorax rate (I<sup>2</sup> = 93% and 66%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT-guided LML is safer and more successful than HWL for patients with PNs before VATS resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"18 3","pages":"401-409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/83/WIITM-18-51204.PMC10585457.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.130330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT)-guided liquid material (LM) and hook-wire (HW) are usually localized for pulmonary nodules (PNs) before video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection, but the relative advantages of these 2 techniques remain uncertain.

Aim: This meta-analysis was conceived to juxtapose the efficacy and safety of HW localization (HWL) and LM localization (LML), both guided by CT, for the preoperative localization of PNs.

Material and methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases were searched to identify relevant studies published as of March 2023, after which pooled analyses of study outcomes were conducted.

Results: A total of 7 studies were included in this meta-analysis from 142 relevant studies. These 7 studies included 551 patients (583 PNs) with CT-guided HWL and 551 patients (612 PNs) with LML. The successful localization rate was significantly higher in the LM group (LMG) than in the HW group (HWG) (p = 0.002). The LMG also exhibited significantly lower pooled total complication and lung haemorrhage rates than the HWG (p = 0.007 and 0.00001, respectively). Pooled localization duration, pneumothorax rates, and VATS procedure duration were comparable in both groups (p = 0.45, 0.15, and 0.74, respectively). Furthermore, the pooled postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LMG than in the HWG (p = 0.009). Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of localization duration and pneumothorax rate (I2 = 93% and 66%, respectively).

Conclusions: CT-guided LML is safer and more successful than HWL for patients with PNs before VATS resection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肺结节术前钩丝和液体材料定位的比较:一项荟萃分析。
引言:计算机断层扫描(CT)引导的液体材料(LM)和钩丝(HW)通常在电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)切除前定位肺结节(PNs),但这两种技术的相对优势仍不确定。目的:本荟萃分析旨在将CT引导下的HW定位(HWL)和LM定位(LML)在PNs术前定位中的有效性和安全性并置。材料和方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science和Wanfang数据库,以确定截至2023年3月发表的相关研究,然后对研究结果进行汇总分析。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入142项相关研究中的7项研究。这7项研究包括551名CT引导的HWL患者(583名PNs)和551名LML患者(612名PNs)。LM组(LMG)的定位成功率显著高于HW组(HWG)(p=0.002)。LMG的合并总并发症和肺出血率也显著低于HWG(分别为p=0.007和0.00001)。两组患者的合并定位持续时间、肺气肿发生率和VATS手术持续时间具有可比性(分别为0.45、0.15和0.74)。此外,LMG的合并术后住院时间明显短于HWG(p=0.009)。定位持续时间和肺气肿发生率的终点存在显著的异质性(I2分别为93%和66%)。结论:对于VATS切除前的PNs患者,CT引导的LML比HWL更安全、更成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信