Using machine learning to predict sudden gains in intensive treatment for PTSD

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Nicole M. Christ , Ryan A. Schubert , Rhea Mundle , Sarah Pridgen , Philip Held
{"title":"Using machine learning to predict sudden gains in intensive treatment for PTSD","authors":"Nicole M. Christ ,&nbsp;Ryan A. Schubert ,&nbsp;Rhea Mundle ,&nbsp;Sarah Pridgen ,&nbsp;Philip Held","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sudden gains have been found in PTSD treatment across samples and treatment modality. Sudden gains have consistently predicted better treatment response, illustrating clear clinical implications, though attempts to identify predictors of sudden gains have produced inconsistent findings. To date, sudden gains have not been examined in intensive PTSD treatment programs (ITPs). This study explored the occurrence of sudden gains in a 3-week and 2-week ITP (<em>n</em> = 465 and <em>n</em> = 235), evaluated the effect of sudden gains on post-treatment and follow-up PTSD severity while controlling for overall change, and used three machine learning algorithms to assess our ability to predict sudden gains. We found 31% and 19% of our respective samples experienced a sudden gain during the ITP. In both ITPs, sudden gain status predicted greater PTSD symptom improvement at post-treatment (t<sub>2 W</sub>=−8.57, t<sub>3 W</sub>=−14.86, p &lt; .001) and at 3-month follow-up (t<sub>2 W</sub>=−3.82, t<sub>3 W</sub>=−5.32, p &lt; .001). However, the effect for follow-up was no longer significant after controlling for total symptom reduction across the ITP (t<sub>2 W</sub>=−1.59, t<sub>3 W</sub>=−0.32, p &gt; .05). Our ability to predict sudden gains was poor (AUC &lt;.7) across all three machine learning algorithms. These findings demonstrate that sudden gains can be detected in intensive treatment for PTSD, though their implications for treatment outcomes may be limited. Moreover, despite the use of three machine-learning methods across two fairly large clinical samples, we were still unable to identify variables that accurately predict whether an individual will experience a sudden gain during treatment. Implications for clinical application of these findings and for future studies are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618523001214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sudden gains have been found in PTSD treatment across samples and treatment modality. Sudden gains have consistently predicted better treatment response, illustrating clear clinical implications, though attempts to identify predictors of sudden gains have produced inconsistent findings. To date, sudden gains have not been examined in intensive PTSD treatment programs (ITPs). This study explored the occurrence of sudden gains in a 3-week and 2-week ITP (n = 465 and n = 235), evaluated the effect of sudden gains on post-treatment and follow-up PTSD severity while controlling for overall change, and used three machine learning algorithms to assess our ability to predict sudden gains. We found 31% and 19% of our respective samples experienced a sudden gain during the ITP. In both ITPs, sudden gain status predicted greater PTSD symptom improvement at post-treatment (t2 W=−8.57, t3 W=−14.86, p < .001) and at 3-month follow-up (t2 W=−3.82, t3 W=−5.32, p < .001). However, the effect for follow-up was no longer significant after controlling for total symptom reduction across the ITP (t2 W=−1.59, t3 W=−0.32, p > .05). Our ability to predict sudden gains was poor (AUC <.7) across all three machine learning algorithms. These findings demonstrate that sudden gains can be detected in intensive treatment for PTSD, though their implications for treatment outcomes may be limited. Moreover, despite the use of three machine-learning methods across two fairly large clinical samples, we were still unable to identify variables that accurately predict whether an individual will experience a sudden gain during treatment. Implications for clinical application of these findings and for future studies are discussed.

使用机器学习预测创伤后应激障碍强化治疗的突然收益。
创伤后应激障碍的治疗在样本和治疗方式上都有突然的收获。突增一直预测更好的治疗反应,说明了明确的临床意义,尽管试图确定突增的预测因素产生了不一致的结果。到目前为止,在创伤后应激障碍强化治疗项目(ITP)中还没有对突然的收益进行检查。本研究探讨了3周和2周ITP(n=465和n=235)中突然增加的发生情况,评估了突然增加对治疗后和随访PTSD严重程度的影响,同时控制了整体变化,并使用三种机器学习算法来评估我们预测突然增加的能力。我们发现31%和19%的样本在ITP期间经历了突然增加。在两个ITP中,突增状态预测治疗后PTSD症状改善更大(t2 W=-8.57,t3 W=-14.86,p2 W=-3.82,t3 W=5.32,p2 W=1.59,t3 W=0.32,p>0.05)。我们预测突增的能力较差(AUC
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信