Reducing Door-In to Door-Out Time for Patients Receiving a Mechanical Thrombectomy Using AutoLaunch Protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S427945
Devin M Howell, Timmy Li, Elizabeth Quellhorst, Jeffrey M Katz, Rohan Arora, Jonathan Berkowitz
{"title":"Reducing Door-In to Door-Out Time for Patients Receiving a Mechanical Thrombectomy Using AutoLaunch Protocol.","authors":"Devin M Howell,&nbsp;Timmy Li,&nbsp;Elizabeth Quellhorst,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Katz,&nbsp;Rohan Arora,&nbsp;Jonathan Berkowitz","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S427945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Door-in to door-out (DIDO) time for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke is an emerging stroke performance measure. Initial presentation at a non-Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) requires a transfer process that minimizes delays. Our objective was to assess whether DIDO time for stroke patients was reduced after implementation of an AutoLaunch protocol for interfacility transfers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pre-post analysis of an AutoLaunch protocol for all acute stroke patients transferred to a CSC for mechanical thrombectomy. The distribution of DIDO times between patients transferred via the AutoLaunch and traditional dispatch protocols were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 92 interfacility transfers, with 22 utilizing the AutoLaunch protocol and 70 utilizing traditional dispatch. Among AutoLaunch transfers, the median DIDO time was 85 minutes (IQR: 71, 133), while the median DIDO time among the traditional transfers was 109 minutes (IQR, 84, 144) (p=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of an AutoLaunch protocol for patients with suspected LVO was associated with a reduction in DIDO time to CSCs. Further studies should evaluate patient outcomes based on transfer strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"367-371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/6b/oaem-15-367.PMC10590110.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S427945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Door-in to door-out (DIDO) time for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke is an emerging stroke performance measure. Initial presentation at a non-Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) requires a transfer process that minimizes delays. Our objective was to assess whether DIDO time for stroke patients was reduced after implementation of an AutoLaunch protocol for interfacility transfers.

Methods: This was a pre-post analysis of an AutoLaunch protocol for all acute stroke patients transferred to a CSC for mechanical thrombectomy. The distribution of DIDO times between patients transferred via the AutoLaunch and traditional dispatch protocols were compared.

Results: We evaluated 92 interfacility transfers, with 22 utilizing the AutoLaunch protocol and 70 utilizing traditional dispatch. Among AutoLaunch transfers, the median DIDO time was 85 minutes (IQR: 71, 133), while the median DIDO time among the traditional transfers was 109 minutes (IQR, 84, 144) (p=0.044).

Conclusion: Implementation of an AutoLaunch protocol for patients with suspected LVO was associated with a reduction in DIDO time to CSCs. Further studies should evaluate patient outcomes based on transfer strategies.

使用AutoLaunch协议减少接受机械血栓切除术的患者门到门的时间。
背景:大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中的门进门出(DIDO)时间是一种新兴的卒中表现指标。在非综合性中风中心(CSC)的首次演示需要一个最大限度地减少延误的转移过程。我们的目的是评估在实施设施间转移的AutoLaunch协议后,中风患者的DIDO时间是否减少。方法:这是对所有转移到CSC进行机械血栓切除术的急性中风患者的AutoLaunch方案的前后分析。比较了通过AutoLaunch和传统调度协议转移的患者之间的DIDO时间分布。结果:我们评估了92个设施间传输,其中22个使用AutoLaunch协议,70个使用传统调度。在自动启动转移中,DIDO时间中位数为85分钟(IQR:71133),而传统转移中的DIDO时间中值为109分钟(IQR,84144)(p=0.044)。进一步的研究应该基于转移策略来评估患者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信