Comparison of Educational and Academic Quality of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Videos on WebSurg® and YouTube® Platforms.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1177/15533506231208583
Hilmi Anil Dincer, Ömer Cennet, Ahmet Bulent Dogrul
{"title":"Comparison of Educational and Academic Quality of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Videos on WebSurg<sup>®</sup> and YouTube<sup>®</sup> Platforms.","authors":"Hilmi Anil Dincer, Ömer Cennet, Ahmet Bulent Dogrul","doi":"10.1177/15533506231208583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the educational and academic quality of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) videos on YouTube<sup>®</sup> and WebSurg<sup>®</sup> platforms.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>YouTube and WebSurg platforms were searched with the keyword \"laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy\". According to the exclusion criteria, 12 videos were found on WebSurg. To ensure a 1:1 ratio, the first 12 videos that met the criteria on YouTube were also analyzed. Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used to evaluate the reliability of the videos. The non-educational quality of the videos was calculated using the Global Quality Score (GQS), the educational and academic quality of videos was calculated using Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy-specific score (LDP-SS) and Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines scoring system (LAP-VEGaS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean JAMA score was 1.58 on YouTube and 2.83 on WebSurg (<i>P</i> < .001). The median GQS was 2 on YouTube and 5 on WebSurg (<i>P</i> < .001). The median LAP-VEGaS score was 8 on YouTube and 14.5 on WebSurg (<i>P</i> < .001). The median LDP-SS score was 6 on YouTube and 9.5 on WebSurg (<i>P</i> = .001). According to the LAP-VEGaS, eleven (91.7%) of the WebSurg videos had a high score of 11 or more (<i>P</i> = .04). According to Spearman correlation analysis, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between LDP-SS and JAMA, GQS and LAP-VEGaS (<i>r</i>: .589, <i>P</i> = .002; <i>r</i>: .648, <i>P</i> = .001; <i>r</i>: .848, <i>P</i> < .001 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WebSurg is superior to the YouTube in terms of educational and academic value, quality, accuracy, reliability and usability in scientific meetings for LDP videos.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506231208583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the educational and academic quality of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) videos on YouTube® and WebSurg® platforms.

Material and methods: YouTube and WebSurg platforms were searched with the keyword "laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy". According to the exclusion criteria, 12 videos were found on WebSurg. To ensure a 1:1 ratio, the first 12 videos that met the criteria on YouTube were also analyzed. Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used to evaluate the reliability of the videos. The non-educational quality of the videos was calculated using the Global Quality Score (GQS), the educational and academic quality of videos was calculated using Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy-specific score (LDP-SS) and Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines scoring system (LAP-VEGaS).

Results: The mean JAMA score was 1.58 on YouTube and 2.83 on WebSurg (P < .001). The median GQS was 2 on YouTube and 5 on WebSurg (P < .001). The median LAP-VEGaS score was 8 on YouTube and 14.5 on WebSurg (P < .001). The median LDP-SS score was 6 on YouTube and 9.5 on WebSurg (P = .001). According to the LAP-VEGaS, eleven (91.7%) of the WebSurg videos had a high score of 11 or more (P = .04). According to Spearman correlation analysis, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between LDP-SS and JAMA, GQS and LAP-VEGaS (r: .589, P = .002; r: .648, P = .001; r: .848, P < .001 respectively).

Conclusions: The WebSurg is superior to the YouTube in terms of educational and academic value, quality, accuracy, reliability and usability in scientific meetings for LDP videos.

WebSurg®和YouTube®平台上腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术视频的教育和学术质量比较。
背景:本研究的目的是比较YouTube®和WebSurg®平台上腹腔镜胰远端切除术(LDP)视频的教育和学术质量。材料和方法:在YouTube和WebSurg平台上搜索关键词“腹腔镜胰远端切除术”。根据排除标准,在WebSurg上发现了12个视频。为了确保1:1的比例,还对YouTube上符合标准的前12个视频进行了分析。使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)的基准标准来评估视频的可靠性。视频的非教育质量使用全球质量评分(GQS)计算,视频的教育和学术质量使用腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术特异性评分(LDP-SS)和腹腔镜手术视频教育指南评分系统(LAP-VGAS)计算。结果:《美国医学会杂志》在YouTube上的平均得分为1.58,在WebSurg上的平均分为2.83(P<.001)。GQS中位数在YouTube上为2,在WebSburg上为5(P<.001)。LAP-VGAS中位数在YouTube和WebSburg上分别为8和14.5(P<.0001)。LDP-SS中位数在YouTube和WebSurg分别为6和9.5(P=.001),11个(91.7%)WebSurg视频的高分达到或超过11分(P=0.04)。根据Spearman相关性分析,LDP-SS与JAMA、GQS和LAP-VGAS之间存在统计学上显著的正相关(分别为r:.589,P=0.002;r:.648,P=0.001;r:.848,P<.001)。结论:在LDP视频的科学会议中,WebSurg在教育和学术价值、质量、准确性、可靠性和可用性方面优于YouTube。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信