A unique artificial intelligence-based tool for automated CBCT segmentation of mandibular incisive canal.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20230321
Thanatchaporn Jindanil, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz, Reinhilde Jacobs
{"title":"A unique artificial intelligence-based tool for automated CBCT segmentation of mandibular incisive canal.","authors":"Thanatchaporn Jindanil, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz, Reinhilde Jacobs","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20230321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool for automated segmentation of mandibular incisive canal on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ethical approval, a data set of 200 CBCT scans were selected and categorized into training (160), validation (20), and test (20) sets. CBCT scans were imported into Virtual Patient Creator and ground truth for training and validation were manually segmented by three oral radiologists in multiplanar reconstructions. Intra- and interobserver analysis for human segmentation variability was performed on 20% of the data set. Segmentations were imported into Mimics for standardization. Resulting files were imported to 3-Matic for analysis using surface- and voxel-based methods. Evaluation metrics involved time efficiency, analysis metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), Root mean square error (RMSE), precision, recall, accuracy, and consistency. These values were calculated considering AI-based segmentation and refined-AI segmentation compared to manual segmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average time for AI-based segmentation, refined-AI segmentation and manual segmentation was 00:10, 08:09, and 47:18 (284-fold time reduction). AI-based segmentation showed mean values of DSC 0.873, IoU 0.775, RMSE 0.256 mm, precision 0.837 and recall 0.890 while refined-AI segmentation provided DSC 0.876, IoU 0.781, RMSE 0.267 mm, precision 0. 852 and recall 0.902 with the accuracy of 0.998 for both methods. The consistency was one for AI-based segmentation and 0.910 for manual segmentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An innovative AI-tool for automated segmentation of mandibular incisive canal on CBCT scans was proofed to be accurate, time efficient, and highly consistent, serving pre-surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"20230321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool for automated segmentation of mandibular incisive canal on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

Methods: After ethical approval, a data set of 200 CBCT scans were selected and categorized into training (160), validation (20), and test (20) sets. CBCT scans were imported into Virtual Patient Creator and ground truth for training and validation were manually segmented by three oral radiologists in multiplanar reconstructions. Intra- and interobserver analysis for human segmentation variability was performed on 20% of the data set. Segmentations were imported into Mimics for standardization. Resulting files were imported to 3-Matic for analysis using surface- and voxel-based methods. Evaluation metrics involved time efficiency, analysis metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), Root mean square error (RMSE), precision, recall, accuracy, and consistency. These values were calculated considering AI-based segmentation and refined-AI segmentation compared to manual segmentation.

Results: Average time for AI-based segmentation, refined-AI segmentation and manual segmentation was 00:10, 08:09, and 47:18 (284-fold time reduction). AI-based segmentation showed mean values of DSC 0.873, IoU 0.775, RMSE 0.256 mm, precision 0.837 and recall 0.890 while refined-AI segmentation provided DSC 0.876, IoU 0.781, RMSE 0.267 mm, precision 0. 852 and recall 0.902 with the accuracy of 0.998 for both methods. The consistency was one for AI-based segmentation and 0.910 for manual segmentation.

Conclusions: An innovative AI-tool for automated segmentation of mandibular incisive canal on CBCT scans was proofed to be accurate, time efficient, and highly consistent, serving pre-surgical planning.

一种独特的基于人工智能的工具,用于下颌切牙管的CBCT自动分割。
目的:开发并验证一种新的人工智能(AI)工具,用于在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)上自动分割下颌切牙管。方法:在伦理批准后,选择200个CBCT扫描数据集,并将其分为训练(160)、验证(20)和测试(20)集。CBCT扫描被导入Virtual Patient Creator,用于训练和验证的基本事实由三名口腔放射科医生在多平面重建中手动分割。对20%的数据集进行了人体分割变异性的观察者内和观察者间分析。分段被导入Mimics进行标准化。将结果文件导入3-Matic,以便使用基于表面和体素的方法进行分析。评估指标包括时间效率、分析指标,包括骰子相似系数(DSC)、并集交集(IoU)、均方根误差(RMSE)、精确度、召回率、准确性和一致性。这些值是在考虑基于人工智能的分割和与手动分割相比的精细人工智能分割的情况下计算的。结果:基于人工智能的分割、精细人工智能分割和手动分割的平均时间分别为00:10、08:09和47:18(时间缩短284倍)。基于AI的分割显示DSC 0.873、IoU 0.775、RMSE 0.256的平均值 mm,精度0.837,召回率0.890,而精细AI分割提供DSC 0.876,IoU 0.781,RMSE 0.267 mm,精度为0。852,召回率0.902,两种方法的准确度均为0.998。对于基于AI的分割,一致性为1,对于手动分割为0.910。结论:一种创新的人工智能工具,用于在CBCT扫描上自动分割下颌切牙管,被证明是准确、高效、高度一致的,为术前计划服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信