Rationale for organized Colorectal cancer screening programs

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Carlo Senore , Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar , Lucie de Jonge , Linda Rabeneck
{"title":"Rationale for organized Colorectal cancer screening programs","authors":"Carlo Senore ,&nbsp;Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar ,&nbsp;Lucie de Jonge ,&nbsp;Linda Rabeneck","doi":"10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health problem and it is expected that the number of persons diagnosed with CRC and CRC-related deaths will continue to increase. However, recent years have shown reductions in CRC incidence and mortality particularly among individuals aged 50 years and older which can be attributed to screening, improvements in patients’ management, closer adherence to treatment guideline recommendations and a higher utilization of curative surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has concluded that there has been sufficient evidence that biennially screening using a stool-test or once-only </span>endoscopy<span><span> screening reduces CRC-related mortality. In Europe, between 2008 and 2018, nine countries have successfully implemented a population-based organized program and another six are in the roll-out phase. Population-based organized programs show higher screening participation rates and lower lack of compliance to follow-up testing after a positive screen test compared to opportunistic screening. Moreover, organized programs aim to provide high quality screening thereby reducing the risk of the harms of screening, including over-screening, and complications of screening, and poor follow-up of those who test positive. We describe how population-based organized CRC screening programs are preferred, since they reflect a more appropriate utilization of available resources, reduce inequities in access, and can integrate interventions addressing barriers to screening at the individual and </span>health system levels.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56031,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521691823000306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health problem and it is expected that the number of persons diagnosed with CRC and CRC-related deaths will continue to increase. However, recent years have shown reductions in CRC incidence and mortality particularly among individuals aged 50 years and older which can be attributed to screening, improvements in patients’ management, closer adherence to treatment guideline recommendations and a higher utilization of curative surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has concluded that there has been sufficient evidence that biennially screening using a stool-test or once-only endoscopy screening reduces CRC-related mortality. In Europe, between 2008 and 2018, nine countries have successfully implemented a population-based organized program and another six are in the roll-out phase. Population-based organized programs show higher screening participation rates and lower lack of compliance to follow-up testing after a positive screen test compared to opportunistic screening. Moreover, organized programs aim to provide high quality screening thereby reducing the risk of the harms of screening, including over-screening, and complications of screening, and poor follow-up of those who test positive. We describe how population-based organized CRC screening programs are preferred, since they reflect a more appropriate utilization of available resources, reduce inequities in access, and can integrate interventions addressing barriers to screening at the individual and health system levels.

有组织的癌症结直肠癌筛查项目的基本原理。
癌症是一个主要的健康问题,预计被诊断患有结直肠癌的人数和与结直肠癌相关的死亡人数将继续增加。然而,近年来CRC发病率和死亡率有所下降,尤其是在50岁及以上的人群中,这可归因于筛查、患者管理的改进、更严格地遵守治疗指南建议以及更高程度地利用治疗性手术、化疗和放疗。国际癌症研究机构得出的结论是,有足够的证据表明,每两年进行一次检查或一次性内窥镜检查可以降低CRC相关死亡率。在欧洲,2008年至2018年间,有9个国家成功实施了一项基于人口的有组织计划,另有6个国家处于推广阶段。与机会性筛查相比,基于人群的有组织项目显示出更高的筛查参与率和对阳性筛查后后续检测的不依从性更低。此外,有组织的项目旨在提供高质量的筛查,从而降低筛查危害的风险,包括过度筛查、筛查并发症以及对检测呈阳性者的不良随访。我们描述了如何优先选择基于人群的有组织CRC筛查计划,因为它们反映了对可用资源的更适当利用,减少了获取方面的不公平,并且可以整合干预措施,解决个人和卫生系统层面的筛查障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Each topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialty of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信