Utilization of and barriers to a telemedicine system at a rural general hospital in Japan: a mixed methods study.

Takahiro Hirano, Tadashi Kobayashi, Hiroki Maita, Takashi Akimoto, Hiroyuki Kato
{"title":"Utilization of and barriers to a telemedicine system at a rural general hospital in Japan: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Takahiro Hirano,&nbsp;Tadashi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hiroki Maita,&nbsp;Takashi Akimoto,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kato","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2023-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The initial and operational costs of telemedicine are major barriers to its adoption. We aimed to investigate and identify the barriers to adopting a telemedicine system in a Japanese rural general hospital without incurring setup and operational costs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our study was conducted between May and August 2018, and included six general practitioners working at a rural general hospital. We extracted data collected from messages (date and time, sender and recipient, and counts and contents of messages) and conducted semi-structured interviews, which were then analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We quantitatively analyzed the total counted of the 179 messages. The total counts recorded for each physician were 56 (A), 20 (B), 3 (C), 74 (D), 5 (E), and 21 (F). The mean monthly counts were 2.17 (May), 8.50 (June), 11.50 (July), and 7.67 (August). Interview data from the six physicians yielded 13 codes that included various points of dissatisfaction acting as barriers to using our system, which we grouped into mental and physical barriers. Mental barriers included suspicion of carrying, feelings of isolation, and loss, whereas physical barriers included portability, user authentication, internet speed, group chat system, notice, search image, typing, chat system, print facility, and limited function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The representative barriers to introducing a telemedicine system at a rural general hospital in Japan without initial and running costs could be classified as feelings of isolation and suspicion of carrying (mental barriers); and notice, portability, and user authentication (physical barriers). Continued investigation in this area is warranted, and solutions to these barriers could improve the shortage of medical staff in the context of declining birth rates and aging populations in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/6d/jrm-18-226.PMC10579925.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2023-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The initial and operational costs of telemedicine are major barriers to its adoption. We aimed to investigate and identify the barriers to adopting a telemedicine system in a Japanese rural general hospital without incurring setup and operational costs.

Materials and methods: Our study was conducted between May and August 2018, and included six general practitioners working at a rural general hospital. We extracted data collected from messages (date and time, sender and recipient, and counts and contents of messages) and conducted semi-structured interviews, which were then analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods.

Results: We quantitatively analyzed the total counted of the 179 messages. The total counts recorded for each physician were 56 (A), 20 (B), 3 (C), 74 (D), 5 (E), and 21 (F). The mean monthly counts were 2.17 (May), 8.50 (June), 11.50 (July), and 7.67 (August). Interview data from the six physicians yielded 13 codes that included various points of dissatisfaction acting as barriers to using our system, which we grouped into mental and physical barriers. Mental barriers included suspicion of carrying, feelings of isolation, and loss, whereas physical barriers included portability, user authentication, internet speed, group chat system, notice, search image, typing, chat system, print facility, and limited function.

Conclusion: The representative barriers to introducing a telemedicine system at a rural general hospital in Japan without initial and running costs could be classified as feelings of isolation and suspicion of carrying (mental barriers); and notice, portability, and user authentication (physical barriers). Continued investigation in this area is warranted, and solutions to these barriers could improve the shortage of medical staff in the context of declining birth rates and aging populations in Japan.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

日本农村综合医院远程医疗系统的使用和障碍:一项混合方法研究。
目的:远程医疗的初始成本和运营成本是采用远程医疗的主要障碍。我们旨在调查和确定在日本农村综合医院采用远程医疗系统而不产生设置和运营成本的障碍。材料和方法:我们的研究于2018年5月至8月进行,包括在一家农村综合医院工作的六名全科医生。我们提取了从消息中收集的数据(日期和时间、发件人和收件人以及消息的数量和内容),并进行了半结构化访谈,然后使用定量和定性方法进行分析。结果:我们对179条信息的总数进行了定量分析。每位医生记录的总计数为56(A)、20(B)、3(C)、74(D)、5(E)和21(F)。月平均数分别为2.17(5月)、8.50(6月)、11.50(7月)和7.67(8月)。来自六位医生的访谈数据产生了13个代码,其中包括作为使用我们系统障碍的各种不满点,我们将其分为心理和身体障碍。心理障碍包括怀疑携带、孤独感和失落感,而身体障碍包括便携性、用户身份验证、网速、群聊系统、通知、搜索图像、打字、聊天系统、打印设备和功能有限。结论:在没有初始和运行成本的情况下,在日本农村综合医院引入远程医疗系统的代表性障碍可分为孤立感和携带怀疑(心理障碍);以及通知、可移植性和用户身份验证(物理屏障)。有必要在这一领域继续进行调查,在日本出生率下降和人口老龄化的背景下,解决这些障碍可以改善医务人员短缺的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信